Case Study Of Greene's Jewelry

Improved Essays
Ms. Lawson is a former employee of Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale LLC, which is located in Derry, New Hampshire. The Company is known for manufacturing and distributing high-end costume jewelry, which is made from a synthetic gold-colored material called Ever Gold. “Ever Gold is impervious to scratches, discoloration, oxidization, and is marked as everlasting gold” (Greene and Howell, 2016), which is the main asset of the company. Ms. Lawson was a junior executive secretary employee in the research and development department at Greene’s Jewelry for three years. Ms. Lawson recently learned she is pregnant and informed Lisa Peele about the good news. After three years of service with the Company, the Human Resource Manager, Lisa Peele notified Ms. …show more content…
Lawson countersuits Greene’ Jewelry and made petition that she was wrongfully terminated based on evidences that are untenable in the Court of Law. Ms. Lawson perception to countersuit Greene’s Jewelry led to her belief that she was terminated after informing Lisa Peele about her pregnancy news. We, the legal group find Ms. Lawson justification against Greene 's Jewelry for wrongful termination will not uphold in the Court of Law. It is our duty as the legal group to dismiss the presented claim against Greene’s Jewelry by providing evidences supporting Ms. Lawson confidentiality agreement violation. Providing the company’s top competitor, Howell Jewelry World, the secret development process of Ever-Gold is unlawful and puts the company’s competitive advantage at risk. This is a technique licensed by the company and is significantly critical to the company’s continuous …show more content…
McConaughy v. The Boswell Oil Company No. C-970218 (1998): Cynthia filed suit against Boswell Oil Company after terminating her. Mrs. McConaughy claims she was unlawfully terminated in breach of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Boswell Oil advised the court to use the prima facie analysis. This test would require McConaughy to demonstrate that there was a connection between her pregnancy and the adverse employment decision, in which she was unable to provide direct evidence. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of Boswell Oil Company stating that Mrs. McConaughy was given adequate pregnancy leave under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 keeping in mind the employer has no maternity or disability leave policy. Plaintiff provides no evidence that she was subjected to an adverse employment decision or that another employee in similar situation in her inability to work received more favorable benefits. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 claim was dismissed against the Boswell Oil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Due to the facts found by Mr. Robinson and the hearing outcome, he ordered that Mr. Sterne be restore to his original position and rank, and be compensated for any back pay and benefits that he had lost since his demotion. Additionally, Robinson found that there was irregularities with how the discipline was handed out and there was no due process and progressive discipline before demotion and loss of pay, thus Sterne was discriminated against an was due his return to his past position with back pay. This case again shows, specific issues with retaliation being taken against subordinates without due process and could actual fall into a Title VII Civil Rights Act case, but the District of Columbia has a Civil Process for adjudicating employee…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dixon v. Pulaski County Special School Dist., 578 F.3d 862, 868 (8th Cir. 2009). "[C]ourts will not second-guess an employer 's business decisions when determining whether the reason given for the [employment decision] was a pretext for discrimination. " Moschetti v. Chicago, Central & Pacific R.R., 119 F.3d 707, 709 (8th Cir. 1997). There is no evidence Union Pacific harbored any discriminatory animus toward Complainant and Complainant has not shown Union Pacific 's reason was pretext for discrimination. Accordingly, Complainant 's discrimination claim fails and should be…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Application of the law to the facts We the legal team for Greene 's Jewelry will assess all the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed argument in court. The lawsuit provides us with the opportunity to introduce different directions for the arguments needed to be made in the courts; from the case laws, regulations, and substantive law. By Utilizing these resources, in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson it is believed that a favorable decision will be made on behalf of Greene 's Jewelry in both cases. Taking a sufficient amount of time to analyze the details of the case we have come to the conclusion that the focal point and the strength of our argument in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson is that she intentionally violated her contract.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did the Supreme Court determine that the plaintiff had a valid CEPA claim?…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people believe that contraceptives should be required in employment based health care. In the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby supreme court case, this is highlighted. This case is an important part of what’s going on in the U.S. today. This case gives people more freedom of religion, but takes away contraceptives that some people that need a job may not be able to afford. The most important points in this case are the background info, court process, and the Supreme Court Decision.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kathleen Bosko

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Latowski, the defendant claims that the plaintiff’s employment was terminated because she had a lifting restriction due to her pregnancy. The plaintiff disputes this proffered reason by claiming that discriminatory statements made against her show the actual motivation for her termination was in fact her pregnancy. This is very similar to the current case because even though the Defendant has stated that the travel accommodations were denied to the plaintiff because she lacked seniority, made her request after Johnathon Myers, and because no other Master Sculptor was available to complete the project, there were also discriminatory remarks made by Kathleen Bosko. These comments were made right after the Plaintiff requested accommodations and included Bosko reminding the Plaintiff that as a Master Sculptor at Bosko Arts Inc,, she holds a “plum position” in the art world and enjoys “steady employment and employment benefits.” Furthermore, in the case of Latowski, the remarks were made by individuals who were involved in or could influence the decision making of the adverse employment conduct, namely Judy Doyle and Rick Ackerman.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case 7: Gillian and Insider Trading Who has moral responsibility for deciding what to do? In this case we are introduced to Gillian Lee, the Senior Administrative Assistant to the VP of Operations at Global Potash Enterprises (GPE). Gillian is faced with the ethical dilemma of whether or not to use insider information about GPE to her advantage.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S. Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002), Mr. Castro was fired for his organizing activities, which he was unlawfully terminated (“Undocumented Workers”., n.d.). “The National Labor Relations Board, the agency that administers the NLRA, ordered the employer to cease and desist, to post a notice that it had violated the law and to reinstate Mr. Castro, and to provide him with back pay for the time he was not working because he had been illegally fired (“Undocumented Workers”. , n.d., p. 5.) .”…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 17, 1954 Thelma Joyce White went to court against Board of Education. The Corpus Christi Times stated that Thelma White believed racial segregation in schools was a violation to the federal law and was unconstitutional towards the African Americans. She was a very brave woman who did not believed on the Separate but Equal act that was established on the court case Plessey v. Ferguson. Thelma White had a big impact on allowing African Americans to attend the same schools that White people attended. Thelma White was born on January 10, 1936 in small city in Texas called Marlin.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Achieving Racial Equality

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The case background is that Duke Power Company would only hire African- Americans if they had a high school diploma and passed a test, they then would get hired into one out of their 5 operating departments which was called the “labor” department. Where the highest wage being paid in the labor department was the lowest wage being paid in any other department and also if an African-American got promoted they would start back at the lowest part of the ladder for new department. The United States court ruled this a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because the high school diploma or the two test that were taken in order to get hired were not required according to the description of the…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sagittarius Brands Essay

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Sagittarius Brands, the parent company of Captain D's Seafood, has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Del Taco. Del Taco, headquartered in Lake Forest, CA, is the nation's second largest Mexican quick-service restaurant chain. Captain D's, headquartered in Nashville, TN, is the nation's second largest seafood quick-service restaurant chain. Kevin K. Moriarty, Chairman and CEO of Del Taco said, "We believe this deal with Sagittarius Brands will give Del Taco strong growth opportunities that will benefit the brand, our employees and our franchise community.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Between the labor and environmental implications of industrial mining and the illegal trade of conflict diamonds in war zones, there are plenty of reasons the $81.4 billion a year global diamond industry could use a high-tech overhaul. Following a cover story in an international issue* of Time on blood diamonds this fall, last week former Tiffany & Co. CEO Michael J. Kowalski published an op-ed in the New York Times urging more responsible gemstone…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, it is my contention that the plaintiff should not win the case, based on the facts provided. However, I do believe that Mr. Jackson had a legitimate case of discrimination against the WLAF and the criteria established in the McDonnell decision had been…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1971, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee brought a lawsuit to a Texas court on behalf of Texas resident Norma L. McCorvey A.K.A. Jane Roe. The…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays