Mrs. Minnie Wright Was Guilty Of The Murder Of A Jury Analysis

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen of the jury. We are here today to decide if the defendant, Mrs. Minnie Wright, is found guilty of the murder of her husband. John Wright, a farmer, who was found dead in his bed by a neighbor, Mr. Hale. Mr. Hale went to see if he could get John Wright to go with him on a party telephone. Mrs. Wright looked queer as she rocked back and forth pleading her apron. Mrs. Wright laughed as Mr. Hale asks to see John and says that he died of a rope around his neck. We have enough evidence to prove that Mrs. Wright is guilty. Mrs. Wright’s house was not a cheerful place. Mr. and Mrs. Wright did not have any children. They only had a canary that would sing in the same way Minnie Wright did back when she was young. Her neighbor Mrs. Hale stated “if there’d been years and years of nothing then a bird to sing to you, it would be awful—still, after the bird was still” (992). For example, this quote illustrates that her life changed after her bird was killed because it was the most important thing in her life since she didn’t have any children to look after. Her bird was …show more content…
Wright was guilty. Such as I mentioned early, group could strength the final paper with outside sources around relationship between men and women in American 1800s and early 1900s, such as, articles of conjugal violence, and psychological violence. Also include more information about Hossack case, a farmer old man who was murder for his wife. In addition, Hossack case, this case where Susan Glaspell created the story of “Trifles”. Other sources could be psychology effects that men produced to women during their unhappy marriage. Our team also could be strength final paper, if we visualize the audience when exposed our trial because we read the paper and didn’t persuade the audience that Mrs. Wright was guilty. In the end, our team learned that final paper needs to be preparing with