Movie Comparison Essay

In the movie, Mr. and Mrs. Stevenson’s lives are elaborated on through the use of flashbacks that display Mrs. Stevenson’s spoiled attitude and her husband’s reluctant complacency, thicken the plot, and music, lighting, and camera angles that build suspense, making the film soar above the screenplay. Compared to the movie, the script is a kindergartner’s ratty piece of art, whereas the film is a masterpiece in brilliant color. The film strays from the path of its written companion by adding a more complex plot line, yet it keeps the main issue the same. The filmmaker’s choice to do so keeps viewers watching while still staying true to its roots. The addition of flashbacks to the movie was a tactful move on the director’s part; Mrs. Stevenson’s position as a bratty, pampered rich-kid is shows to extend much further back, and the audience begins to sympathize with the poor, criminal husband (who was practically non-existent in the screenplay). To start, in the script, the readers only know Henry as the person who left his frantic wife alone for the night. The director creatively made Henry into a major character who is a vital point in Mrs. Stevenson’s backstory. The actress playing Leona Stevenson skillfully portrays the character as entitled to say the least. The story of how she met her husband is so romantic, and is told through a flashback. Once upon a time, Leona Cotterell went …show more content…
The cinematic experience is simply superior in every way imaginable: plot depth, characterization, suspense, perception, technique, visual appeal, description, and entertainment. The addition of flashbacks, which were extinct in the screenplay, take to film to a whole new level, one far above the script. The film is the king, the screenplay is the peasant. The movie was revolutionary for its era, and far out shadows its written