Most Compelling Argument Against The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
The most compelling argument for the death penalty is about the retribution. Retribution is a theory of punishment to prevent future crimes. In addition, death penalty can reduce the rate of the future crimes by kill a convicted murderer. When an executioner kills a convicted murderer, murderer cannot murder others again. Moreover, other criminals will not take the risks by showing this case.
The most compelling argument against the death penalty effects more harm than good. Death penalty is against to the human rights and ethics. Additionally, it may cause higher crime rate. The critics on the death penalty is the example of a two wrongs make a right fallacy.
Any type of events that effect on human life, it is a controversial topic. Therefore,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mcadams Death Penalty

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty gives families closure by making them feel safe again. The victim no longer has to worry about the criminal invading their life or their family's life anymore and making them constantly feel worried. If someone kills another human being, they have “taken the life of another, have forfeited their own right to live.” In more serious crimes, the person who commits the crime is usually sent to jail. The victim's family feels traumatized knowing that the perpetrator is still alive and still a danger to society.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is lethal injection moral? Is lethal injection painful? Should lethal injection be legal? Lethal injection, lethal injection, lethal injection. There is so much talk about this topic, so many articles, and so many questions left unanswered but nobody's doing anything to try and answer our questions.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Xing Wu Prof. Shelley Aley WRTC 103 4/19/2016 We Need Capital Punishment All people need to rule to conduct their behaviors for themselves since they are not child, no one is going to pay the responsibility for their mistakes. From long times ago, people realize that small as group large as country, no matter the size of group, it needs rules to conduct member’s behaviors, to ensure the right individuals, to protect the weak, to restrict the people with power. And the most important part is no matter who breaks the rules, they will be punished. For the death penalty, different people hard to have the same opinion about it existence.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The primary objective of retribution was, “not revenge but rather a return of the net balance of justice that has been upended through crime.” Capital Punishment was considered morally right because Americans believed in the eye for an eye concept. Proponents of the death penalty agree that it is an important tool to preserve law and order, to deter crime, and even to lessen the cost rather than life imprisonment. They claim that retribution is a way to show integrity to the victim, to help console-grieving families, and to ensure that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause any future tragedy. On the other hand,…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Killing people in front of a crowd is wrong sends the wrong message. The general public is allowed to attend executions. But it is probably a frightening experience to watch. “The message it is sending to people is that why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong” (Messerli n.p). It is showing that killing a person is okay because they deserve to die for what they did.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Out of all developed countries in the western world, the United States is the only one that still executes its citizens. From 2007 to 2012 America executed 220 people, making it the fifth largest executioner behind China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq (Amnesty International). Why is the “land of the free” still upholding a harmful practice that other civilized countries have sworn off for decades? The death penalty in America should be abolished because the cost is impractical, it’s too random to be a deterrent for crime, and it endangers marginalized and innocent people’s lives. The state should not give people the right to legally murder others, especially when it costs as much as it does.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty is used for violent offenders who have been convicted of premeditated murder. The death penalty has many purposes. First, it serves as a way for prisons to clear out many of the violent offenders. Second, the death penalty provides safety for both the prison and society. Lastly, the cost to execute someone costs less than keeping someone in prison for life.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” which is how the death penalty basically works, the only actual purpose of the death penalty is vengeance which should never be the reason for any punishment especially being one created by the united states government . The death penalty is something that has been here in the US since the 1600s but has changed and progressed into a less cruel form, it is stated that the first form of death penalty was in the form of hanging and has to progressed to the now used injections which will first put the victim to sleep and then stop his heart from functioning, giving the accused with a peaceful death. The death penalty should be made made illegal in the US because their are many other punishments available…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the topic of the Death Penalty you have to ask yourself the morality of what you are doing, and if other human beings should have the right to take the life of someone else for what you deem as wrong above and beyond the normal crime. From an economic standpoint you realize that it is extremely inefficient not only in terms of time, but in the sheer amount of money it takes for the death penalty to actually be handed down making it more economically inefficient. I. Monetary Cost a. Texas i. Being the state with the largest amount of executions I deemed it fitting to be seen as a key component of defining how much it really costs to actually have the death penalty take place. ii.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justified Murder Essay

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It provides “the perfect punishment” for murderers, a life for a life. But punishment’s arguably most important purpose is to deter crime. Deterrence has the greatest effect on society as a whole (Winters 90). The death penalty it just that, the…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays