Morena V. South Hills Systems Case Study

Decent Essays
In the case Morena v South Hills Systems, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said that the paramedics were not negligent. The paramedics transported a shooting victim to the nearest hospital instead of one that was five miles away with a thoracic surgeon. The court justified the ruling saying that the paramedics could not judge the extent of the patient’s injury. A Thoracic surgeon can operate on critical care patients. They can do surgical repair of the congenital and conditions of the heart. They can also care for coronary arteries, valves, great vessels, and myocardium. Depending on the area of the wound on the shooting victim this type of surgeon could have been a life saver. In this case the victim was shot in the chest and died. Her

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    New York City College of Technology City University of New York Law and Ethics Case: Jeanette M. and the Phone Call Erica Rotstein October 7, 2017 Professor Bonsignore HAS 3560 -Legal Aspects of Health Care Abstract The advancement in the field of medicine over the years has led to doctors and health care providers having more responsibilities on their hands. This brings into question what should and shouldn’t be done, as well as what is morally and ethically right. However, this isn’t so cut and dry.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Dicen v. New Sesco, Inc., 839 N.E.2d 684 (2005). , former employer the Plaintiff brought action against the former employee, the defendant for violating his contract in purchasing stock and other such agreements. The court ruled the employment covenant unreasonably broad in scope. It was found to be unreasonable to restrict the former employee to work anywhere in the United States in the related business, for two years upon leaving the employer; particularly when the employee’s contracts were limited to only a number of states. This case is in favor of Guy as he is restricted from practically working within an eighty mile radius of Scottsdale.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People Vs Diaz Case Study

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages

    According to Pozgar, the case People v. Diaz, the defendant who was a registered nurse worked at a community hospital on the night shift; over a month span, 13 patients under her care had suffered seizures, cardiac, and respiratory arrest, which included nine deaths. The defendant is noted to have started working at a different hospital. After three days, a patient died under the defendant care. The defendant was arrested and in the testimony claimed to have injected patients with extremely high doses of lidocaine. After further investigation, the defendant was observed acting strangely the night of the patients deaths.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Surgeon’s Morning Work Kilrain a confederate soldier was wounded at Little Round Top defending it, he was shot at the side of his stomach. He was taken to a hospital in an ambulance where he began to feel weak from the loss of blood. The bullet would’ve hit the lower part of his rib cage, it would’ve shattered his ribs and throw them towards tissue, possibly hitting his kidney which is a very serious injury, but surgeons during the Civil War didn’t have x-ray machines yet so they couldn’t tell where the bullet was, so they would just have to check around the entrance wound and dig around for the bullet. They would’ve given him an anesthetic drug like Opium, Ether, or Chloroform to deal…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The court defended that there is no law that refuses the professional freedom of physicians to compare problem-solving approaches to their counterparts in order to improve the quality of services they provide to the public. Dr. Ketcham’s affidavit concludes that he had no contact with Dr. Brock concerning the care or treatment of Oliver. He also noted that he was not aware of any contact between the Plaintiff and Dr. Brock while she was a patient at Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital. The supporting evidence mentioned above, lucidly supports Dr. Brock’s motion for summary judgment based on the adjudication of the…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Harrell & Nowak, LLC is a law firm that is located in New Orleans, Louisiana. This law firm is comprised of trial lawyers and personal injury lawyers. Harrell & Nowak, LLC handles cases that involve serious car accident injuries, truck accidents, medical errors, medical malpractice, slips and falls, toxic exposures, and any personal injury that is caused by the fault of someone else. In 2014, they have been conferred with a Litigators Award.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Anna Pou Case Summary

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The medical ethics case on Dr. Anna Pou questions the ethics itself in several forms and different issues. The issue is that the medical departments, nationally or locally, should always provide care for patients no matter the type of emergency or disaster. It doesn’t matter the amount of laws and regulations they pass or provide to help medical institutions work easily and efficiently, which should help provide patients with medical care they rightfully deserve and need. In order to be able to successfully allow such difficult decisions to be made and acted upon such circumstances, such as the one occurred in Medical Memorial Hospital in New Orleans, they need to create clear and conscious laws that is workable and lawfully and medically ethical that the head and the staff of the medical institute can follow easily to avoid such situation in the future. As Dr. Pou has been trying to pass laws to help…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Harvey vs\Strickland case is regarding a doctor who did not follow the patient's consent not to have a blood transfusion if there was an emergency situation. Harvey who is the plaintiff, religious beliefs prevented him from following certain medical procedures that are used if a complication transpired. Harvey signed several forms that stated what not to do while he was competent and he was informed of all the risk that could happen. When the procedure was concluded and a complication occurred in the recovery room, the doctor suggests to Harvey’s mother who was the emergency contact that he needed a blood transfusion. The mother thought twice about it, however, approved the transfusion.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Del Lago Partners Case

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Texas Supreme Court case involving the Del Lago Partners, Inc., and Del Lago Partners, L.P. vs. Bradley Smith has to do with a group of fraternity brothers and a wedding party in a bar. An altercation ended up occurring once the wedding party entered the bar later in the night. According to the case details, some members of the wedding party grew angry as a result of a few of the fraternity members fraternizing with some of the ladies who came with the wedding party. An argument ensued and eventually, members of the wedding party got into a physical altercation with members of the fraternity.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Re Baby B No 2 Summary

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The parents of a premature severely disabled girl were informed that they believed any further treatment would be “futile” and recommended withdrawing care. The doctors placed a “do not resuscitate sign” above her cot in case she had breathing difficulties. The parents disagreed with the medical opinion and applied to the court for an order. The court found that on balancing the notion of “best interest”, it would be lawful for the doctors not to administer any life-sustaining treatment. It was held that if the baby were to survive a crisis it would cause such a detriment that her life will become…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Medicine Have you ever felt the horrible pain of one of your limbs being sawed off? I’m guessing not, but soldiers in the Civil War had it happen all the time. If you were shot in a leg or arm, the surgeons or nurses most likely cut off your limb. The Civil War hospitals were believed to be clean and safe, but were almost as dangerous as the battlefield. The nurses did not have the resources to kill off disease or infection.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    California Vs Murray

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Civil Law, negligence is an action done carelessly by the defendant which results in the plaintiff getting harmed. The four elements of negligence are: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. The reasonable person standard applies to the defendant, so that the harmful situation can be fixed. The three elements of the reasonable person standard are: likelihood of the occurrence, seriousness of the harm, and the cost to eliminate the harm. The case of California v. Murray (The People of California v. Conrad Robert Murray) will further explain how Negligence is used in court.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Jeanette called the hospital regarding how she was having difficulty breathing and the receptionist failed to respond back to the doctor and Jeanette about the patient symptom so it was the receptionist and hospital responsibility to train every employee with policies and regulation since it failed to do so it can be conducted as a civil case. The second step Is it balanced? Yes, Jeanette case does have an advantage over the hospital and the receptionist. The patient called the office concerning about a life-threatening symptom instead of leaving Jeanette unseen she could’ve called the paramedics to check Jeanette places. The hospital does not have advantage over Jeanette case because most likely the hospital can be sued for not following the policy and regulation of not treating a critical patient as first priority.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays