They would be wrong. Others might argue that this play could only belong to the Feminist school of criticism due to the fact that Miranda’s marriage was arranged by her father. I would argue that they have missed the plot of the whole story. I believe that most people would debate that this play is best analyzed by the school of Critical Race Theory. I too, at first, thought that Prospero was just a tyrant exploiting others for what they had to offer. Such as how Ariel was forced to be his servant for twelve years so Prospero could control the magic that Ariel possessed. Additionally, Prospero’s greediness is also evident when Caliban, the misshapen savage, had been Prospero’s slave his entire life so that there was always someone around who had to do Prospero’s bidding. It was not until the end that I realized that Prospero used his power for the greater good of others instead of using his power for his own personal gain; he sent everyone home safely instead of killing all of his foes when he had the
They would be wrong. Others might argue that this play could only belong to the Feminist school of criticism due to the fact that Miranda’s marriage was arranged by her father. I would argue that they have missed the plot of the whole story. I believe that most people would debate that this play is best analyzed by the school of Critical Race Theory. I too, at first, thought that Prospero was just a tyrant exploiting others for what they had to offer. Such as how Ariel was forced to be his servant for twelve years so Prospero could control the magic that Ariel possessed. Additionally, Prospero’s greediness is also evident when Caliban, the misshapen savage, had been Prospero’s slave his entire life so that there was always someone around who had to do Prospero’s bidding. It was not until the end that I realized that Prospero used his power for the greater good of others instead of using his power for his own personal gain; he sent everyone home safely instead of killing all of his foes when he had the