Moral Reasoning Theory

Superior Essays
The general human perception holds that personal behavior is under the guidance of moral reasoning. That is the reason people refer to individual behavior as immoral, it is different from the conventional moral. Psychologists have been making moral evaluations and moral inferences to establish the psychological facts on moral reasoning. However, a common thing in their studies is the need to develop one theory on moral reasoning processes. The journal article begins by making an explanation of main psychological theories regarding human moral decisions. Further, it proceeds to describe the new theory by providing supportive evidence through the results of the research experiments. It finally concludes on the general nature of reasoning about …show more content…
They aim at developing a new theory of moral reasoning with a close reference to permissible situations, the theory of emotions, and the account of intuitions. A close reference to the previous moral reasoning approaches helps the researchers to establish the psychological gaps in those theories. Therefore, the new theory of moral reason is comprehensive because it fills gaps in the previous theories. In all the previous theories, it appears that emotions are the guiding force in moral reasoning (Monica, Sangeet, & Johnson, 2008). Emotions help in coordinating many goals and plans despite the current constraints on a person’s intellectual …show more content…
The information from our course work coverage explains that human emotions and morals are inseparable because the emotions play a critical role in guiding moral reasoning and morals of a person. In fact, both emotions and morals influence each other in modelling moral reasoning of a person (Jensen, Jessica & Niyati, 2015). Therefore, there is no way that they can exist independently. The research discussion lacks a philosophical basis by stipulating the morals and emotions do not have a unique interrelation in moral reasoning.
In conclusion, the topic of the psychology of moral reasoning is important in understanding the psychological aspect that influence human behaviors. It is evident from the journal article that emotions and morals are two psychological aspects that are in interplay to influence the moral reasoning of a person. However, it is notable that there are instances when people think unconsciously to reach moral conclusions. Therefore, it is recommendable for future research to focus on the psychology of unconscious reasoning to arrive at a moral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wetback: The Undocumented Documentary Moral Reasoning Moral Reasoning can be defined as being the process in which an individual tries to determine the difference between what is right and what is wrong on a personal situation by using logic. This is an important and often daily process that people use in an attempt to do the right thing. Every day for instance, people are faced with the dilemma of whether or not to lie in a given situation. People make this decision by reasoning the morality of the action and weighing that against its consequences.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons for why one should be moral; that is, why one should act in a morally correct manner when dealing with others. This paper aims to go over two of the main arguments in favor of moral behavior. The first is presented by Socrates in Plato's text Why Should I Be Moral?, which argues that morality and justice are a key part of the soul, one for which man depends on to live a truly happy life. The second is presented by James Rachels in A Critique of Ethical Egoism, in which he argues that we must not treat others differently because there is no non arbitrary difference between others and ourselves.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Black Coffee Drinkers

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This research also implies that one could have different moral judgements based on whether what they consumed is bitter, neutral, or sweet, so it proposes the idea that moral judgements are not dynamic within or even between individuals, they can change simply based on the taste in their mouth. Perhaps one could conclude that moral judgements should not be taken as seriously in society as they are now, because of their reliability on sensory and perceptual inputs and the ability for them to possibly change with various taste conditions, leading to people possibly judging others less for their moral judgements since they have a better understanding of the nature of where or how the moral judgements can come to…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    III. McGeer, “Varieties of Moral Agency: Lessons from Autism (and Psychopathy)” Victoria McGeer responds to Kant and Kennett’s conclusion that “reverence for reason is the core moral motive” and claims that this debate has been too narrowly focused on empathy; we need not try to reduce morality to one cognitive capacity or affective disposition. McGeer focuses on the question of whether our moral capacities are rooted in sentiment or in rationality; do our affective states guide us, or does reason channel our affective states? McGeer, like Kennett, looks to the abnormalities in cognitive and affective capacities in autism and psychopathy for insight on what constitutes moral agency.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Appiah Intuition

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conversely, others have disputed this claims including Marc Hauser and his colleagues challenging the distinction between impersonal and personal in a method explaining trolley problems by Joshua Greene and Frances Kamm challenging Kahneman and Tversky’s findings do not undermine the possible moral worth of harm and not providing distinction. Intuitive judgements are not similar to perceptual judgments is Appiah’s argument that bears doubt. His argument holds that in moments of recall only perceptual judgments are made and not intuitive and for intuitive judgments, since they lack moral sense. Moral psychologists may disagree with Appiah that there could exist no moral sense faculty and those who believe on the unreliability of intuitive judgements since they aren’t useful heuristics denying the fact of existence of a moral sense faculty.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SLIDE ONE / TWO: MORALS IN A BOTTLE Tonight’s presentation on Moral Enhancement will highlight some of the key concerns in this field of research, whilst also introducing the concept to those of you less familiar with the idea. Then (SLIDE TWO) we will consider some of the ethical and legal problems associated with the ideas of changing the way our brains handle moral decisions. SLIDE THREE: STRUCTURE Our structure for tonight will first introduce the idea of moral enhancement, before moving on to interrogate some of the problems with this field of study.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dr. Ross Rosenberg succinctly compares them to wolves in sheep clothing in his book, "The Human Magnet Syndrome." Savannah Grey paints them as ominous soul suckers in her article,“What walks among us.” The lucky otters heaven blog, who nailed on point by calling them "Body Snatchers".…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though people have this common intuition about morality, people frequently create moral judgements about others based on factors that are not within their control. For example, Driver A and Driver B are both driving down a road. Driver A momentarily takes their eyes off of the road and runs a red light as a child is crossing the street. Driver A slams on the breaks and tries anything to not hit the child;…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study was carried out also to prove that a child’s ability to make moral judgements develops in a predictable way during childhood. Identify the theoretical proposition or hypothesis on which…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans as a species are ridiculously complex. Our capacity for emotion is what sets us apart from all of the other species on the planet. While other organisms do feel emotion, we stand alone in the way we express ourselves. Alongside that is our unique sense of “good” and “evil”. Humans have a concept of what is right and what is wrong, and this is often called our conscience.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, just as all moral intuitions must require emotions, all emotions must require an evolutionary past. Consider again the proposition that the death of a person is a bad thing. I have already shown that this elicits an intuition that is necessarily–at least to some degree–emotional. But where does that emotion come from? While it is much easier to trace the evolutionary history of stronger emotions such as fear and disgust, even weaker emotions like compassion have their primeval origins.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The study was to form a theory that explained the development of moral reasoning (Cherry, n.d.). Kohlberg’s model breaks our development of morality into three levels, each of which is divided further into two…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gore and Sadler-Smith (2011) proceed to show the effects of dual-processing on intuition, and offer the theory that intuitive thinking is a much more conceptual and expansive process. The primary basis of this research was to show that while intuition plays a role in decision-making, it does not act alone. The findings show that the nature of intuition is strongly guided by individual façades of moral judgment (ingenuously, how we unconsciously act in order to produce embedded moral standards). Research argues that intuitive thinking relies heavily on emotional processing, as well as the biological anatomy of moral judgment (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011). The idea that self-efficacy and the belief in one’s own actions effects the ability and accuracy of individual intuitions – people with low-levels of self-efficacy are less likely to produce large amounts of intuitive thinking, and will more often choose careful analysis (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011).…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays