They aim at developing a new theory of moral reasoning with a close reference to permissible situations, the theory of emotions, and the account of intuitions. A close reference to the previous moral reasoning approaches helps the researchers to establish the psychological gaps in those theories. Therefore, the new theory of moral reason is comprehensive because it fills gaps in the previous theories. In all the previous theories, it appears that emotions are the guiding force in moral reasoning (Monica, Sangeet, & Johnson, 2008). Emotions help in coordinating many goals and plans despite the current constraints on a person’s intellectual …show more content…
The information from our course work coverage explains that human emotions and morals are inseparable because the emotions play a critical role in guiding moral reasoning and morals of a person. In fact, both emotions and morals influence each other in modelling moral reasoning of a person (Jensen, Jessica & Niyati, 2015). Therefore, there is no way that they can exist independently. The research discussion lacks a philosophical basis by stipulating the morals and emotions do not have a unique interrelation in moral reasoning.
In conclusion, the topic of the psychology of moral reasoning is important in understanding the psychological aspect that influence human behaviors. It is evident from the journal article that emotions and morals are two psychological aspects that are in interplay to influence the moral reasoning of a person. However, it is notable that there are instances when people think unconsciously to reach moral conclusions. Therefore, it is recommendable for future research to focus on the psychology of unconscious reasoning to arrive at a moral