Moral Reasoning Theories
The four assignments were based on the previous theories on indefinability of moral propositions, independent systems, deontic reasoning, and moral inconsistency. The theory on indefinability of moral propositions explains that no simple criteria can use proposition alone to define own moral reasoning. Independent systems stipulate that emotions and deontic assessments follow separate systems that operate in parallel while deontic reasoning holds that deontic evaluations depend on inferences. Besides, the moral inconsistency holds that beliefs for moral reasoning are incomplete and …show more content…
The information from our course work coverage explains that human emotions and morals are inseparable because the emotions play a critical role in guiding moral reasoning and morals of a person. In fact, both emotions and morals influence each other in modelling moral reasoning of a person (Jensen, Jessica & Niyati, 2015). Therefore, there is no way that they can exist independently. The research discussion lacks a philosophical basis by stipulating the morals and emotions do not have a unique interrelation in moral reasoning.
In conclusion, the topic of the psychology of moral reasoning is important in understanding the psychological aspect that influence human behaviors. It is evident from the journal article that emotions and morals are two psychological aspects that are in interplay to influence the moral reasoning of a person. However, it is notable that there are instances when people think unconsciously to reach moral conclusions. Therefore, it is recommendable for future research to focus on the psychology of unconscious reasoning to arrive at a moral