Morality is an idea that certain doings are right and noble though some others are bad. But can luck ever create a metamorphosis when it comes to morality? Both John and Pat became equally drunk and they both decided to drive home. This is automatically an awful idea because; you will likely become arrested by the police if they caught you with impaired driving. The difference is Pat encountered an external factor by hitting Ms. Dalloway’s poodle while John got home safely. I ask myself this, who is morally worse? In this circumstance, both John and Pat are both victims of Moral Luck.
In the majority of cases, Pat is morally worse than John because he hit a dog while he remained driving under the influence of alcohol. If he only would’ve drunk
In the majority of cases, Pat is morally worse than John because he hit a dog while he remained driving under the influence of alcohol. If he only would’ve drunk