Examples Of Moral Dilemma

Superior Essays
Moral Dilemma Ethics Essay
Imagine you discover one of your close friends has been falsely embellishing his academic achievements, claiming he has several graduate degrees. You are concerned about him and want to confirm the truth. When you gracefully approach him with your curiosity, your friend denies the accusation. Instead of giving counter arguments to prove his claims, he only rejects yours. Time has passed and you are no longer close friends. Recently you discover he is now engaged to a woman you know. With mutual friends connecting you and the woman, you ponder on what action you should take next. As much as you don’t want to associate with this man again, you adopt his fiancée’s perspective. If you were the man’s fiancée, you feel
…show more content…
The woman would eventually marry this deceitful man and then more possibilities would arise. The woman might be married to a man who could instantly lose his job if his employers were to find out and then not only would the man suffer, but the woman too. Would the person feel bad for not intervening and possibly saving them from this financial loss? What if the man wasn’t just lying about his education and the woman is now married to man who has lied to her their entire relationship. Would the person feel guilty knowing they could’ve saved her from marrying a man she didn’t
Wills3
fully know? Maybe the woman marries the man and someone else finds out about his lies, and eventually the woman’s credibility is also questioned because they believe she must be supporting his fraud. Would the sender wish they would’ve warned the woman so she could decide for herself if she wanted to be associated with this man’s actions?
There are numerous amounts of scenarios the sender has to contemplate over, knowing that whichever decision they make, will indeed have specific effects on the woman, the man, and themselves. When referring to consequentialist theory, the morally right decision supported would be to tell the woman. However, there are other theories that can be applied to this situation, to conclude which action is most morally right. Another moral theory that can be utilized to support telling the secret to the
…show more content…
Therefore, they judge the action’s “nature” and decide whether or not the act is morally sound (102). Immanuel Kant, a well-known philosopher in the deontologist category, has a theory one could use to debate what action is morally right in this particular case. According to Kant’s theory, “all our duties, all the moral categorical imperatives, (what we should do in all situations, regardless of our wants and needs) can be logically derived from the categorical imperative” (103). When applying the categorical imperative, there are two versions needed to consider. Kant lists two criteria that scale the first version of the categorical imperative. The first: “if everyone can consistently act on the maxim (general rule) in similar situations (103). The second: “you would be willing to let that happen” (103). In Kant’s reasoning, if you are willingly accept the action as universal for all to follow, it must be morally permissible. The second version to the categorical imperative is applying the rule of the “means-end principle”. The means- end principle states that we need to treat people (including ourselves) as individuals who have “intrinsic worth” rather than “tools” others can use for their own personal gain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Deceit and Betrayal Every living human being has been deceived at least once in their lifetime. There’s always a reason behind deceit, and sometimes the reason may be to create something better in one's life. In Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare, the people of Messina face a time in their lives where their lives revolve around nothing but pure deceit. Deceiving someone doesn’t always seem like a nice thing to do to, however, good things may come out of it to bring certain information out in the light.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deception is usually considered immoral. Yet most people tend to deceive someone regularly. They might not realize it, but their act of deception can cause an extreme deal of trouble for others – even if it is something significantly unimportant. The same concept occurred during Shakespeare’s Othello. Deception is commonly viewed in a negative manner but this is not exclusively the case in Shakespeare’s Othello.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clancy Martin Lies

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Essay on Truthfulness, Deceit, and the Growth and Care of Erotic Love by Clancy Martin provides an interesting perspective on love, marriage, and happiness. Clancy Martin argues that a large majority of people cannot comprehend true love because of self-deception and deception to their significant other. There is a stigma that true love depends on complete and utter honesty and that is simply not true. Love is many things like eroticism, deceitfulness, and satisfaction but it is not complete honesty. He discusses how we as humans commonly lie and we are taught deception at a young age and this in turn carries into our adulthood.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, if the friend never discovered that the person lied to them, and both continued to live happily and maintain a strong friendship, then Hospers questions is the person’s action still wrong, even though it produced the maximum good. As a result, Hospers does not believe that the moral status of an action should not be determined by the effect of the…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In discussions of deceitfulness, one controversial issue has been if it is ever right to lie. Both Anton Chekhov’s “The Lady with the Dog” and Stephen Carter’s “The Insufficiency of Honesty” argue that lying can be rationalized. On the other hand, some people argue that lying is never virtuous as it misleads others. However, I argue that, lying can be justified if it is not used for malicious intent, because it is often used selflessly to protect the feelings of others.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Wells

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What that first case really taught me — which has been reinforced countless times — is that in the right set of circumstances, most people are capable of acting dishonestly. I say this not as a moral judgment, but rather as a simple fact”. (Wells,…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The art of deception is something that all humans are familiar with. For many people, falling victim to this action will happen quite a few times throughout one's lifetime. The question can be how to react to such an instance when the reality of the situation comes to life. Especially once it is realized that while one can blame the action on another, the true deception took place within the mind of the victim. Humans tend to create scenarios and formulate lies about the situation or relationship at hand based on the actions and words of those around them.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. On Page 22 of Richard E. Kim’s The martyred they discuss the two ministers that were forced to confess and mention how even though they probably were not the culprits of the crime, still wanted a confession out of them. During this, it is said they wanted this confession “For the sake of justice, I want to hear his confession. But I won't turn that against him.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Societal problems in modern society have arise due to Deception: the art of manipulating others by lying to them and causing them to believe you based on their own personal gain and interest. (www.urbandictionary.com) Often times, deception is used by the media, government, and society for the purposes of achieving a particular agenda. By achieving deception we avoid others personal beliefs and values and focus on our own selfish desires and ambitions to achieve power and rank in society. When people make comments like how was your day going and you respond it was good to only make that person feel satisfied with your comment, then you are deceiving that person to only make them feel better with themselves.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ethicist Case Study

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    s it Ethical to Pose as a Lesbian Couple for a Couple’s Discount? A person submitted an interesting conundrum to the New York Times “The Ethicist” column. She wanted to join a local pool that offered a discount for a couple, which could be defined as a married couple, or a couple in a relationship who cohabitate. The writer’s husband did not want to join the pool, so she and her friend posed as a lesbian couple and used the writer’s address for both women to pose as a cohabitating couple, and asked The Ethicist if this was “okay” for her and her friend, because they are not lesbians at all. After examining the issue, considering the viewpoint of The Ethicist, and applying Kantian rules, it is clear that this is not an ethical act.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The second scenario will be of an Indian spiritual guru who manipulates vulnerable devotees and charges them money for a blessing. I will approach both these scenarios from an ethical standpoint and also by using one or more dimensions of the moral basis to support the manipulation in both of the scenarios. I will not be agreeing on the evolutionary basis of why such a moral basis exists. The structure of my essay will be simple, following this introduction I will have a paragraph which defines the dimensions of a moral basis and also what a utility is. After that, I will have 3 paragraphs for each scenarios, the first describing the manipulation/situation, the second will be a discussion on ethics, and the last will be a discussion…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans have the power to decide if an action is wrong or right. What differentiates people are their morals and ethics. It makes a big difference when we, as humans choose what is right in our eyes and proceed to act. Morals are what shapes us as individuals and what makes us unique in a certain way. The moral principle to any situation would be to do the right thing above all.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays