Meta Ethical Subjectivism Analysis

Good Essays
I agree with Meta ethical Subjectivism and shall therefore be trying to support the claim written above. Some arguments that support Meta ethical Subjectivism are the argument from moral motivation and the argument of economy. Objections to Meta ethical Subjectivism are that it allows for moral equivalence and can be quite arbitrary. Meta ethical Subjectivism suggests that moral judgements cannot be true or false because they are not trying to describe anything. Moral judgements are instead understood to be the expression of one’s feelings of approval or disapproval towards an action (Reason and Responsibility, Feinberg and Shafer-Landau, 2015, part 4, chpt. 2, pg603).
David Hume’s view of Meta ethical Subjectivism is referred to as the argument from moral motivation. The argument is that moral judgments motivate people without needing anything else to persuade them to do something unlike factual judgements that cannot motivate without something like a desire to add motivation. Therefore moral
…show more content…
2, pg608). This means that if all moral views have the same potential to be true or ‘right’ then we must give equal weight to views that we do not agree with as being ‘right’, it means we cannot criticise rapists or assaulters because their behaviour is based on their moral ideas and they must be holding those beliefs sincerely and believe them to be true. Therefore, meaning that meta ethical subjectivists believe that moral judgements are just the vocalisation of taste, however the taste for ‘wrong’ things such as wanton cruelty is not considered worse than a taste for kindness (Reason and Responsibility, Feinberg and Shafer-Landau, 2015, part 4, chpt. 2,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This maxim calls us to respect others and ourselves as people with moral worth and dignity. Kant believed that since each human was born with the ability to ration, they therefore, are all creatures of moral worth. By avoiding the use of people as a mere means, we can guarantee that the action is morally worthy. In order to act with moral worth, we are called by the ‘Rights Test’ to “recognize human beings as valuable in and of themselves, regardless of their physical and mental attributes… or what they are worth to others” (Hamilton). Ultimately, a Kantian ethical framework does not emphasize the outcome that is achieved by an action, but instead, determines the moral worth of an action based on the motive behind it.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This statement enclosed the justification and the base of the ethical egoism theory, therefore the pursuit of the well- being is the main purpose. Ethical egoism is a controversial moral theory, because it says that we should embrace the self- interest idea. That is whatever we do we should do in the pursuit of our own interest it does not matter if in the process of doing it we harm others. If we fail to do as the…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It involves assessing what the people perceive to be moral and taking actions which will produce insignificant consequences on the people other than the individual performing the act. REGARDING EITHER THEORIST 6. As provided by Kant on his ethical theory, the standard of living an ethical life entails carrying out the logical reasoning behind the actions which are perceived to be moral. Kant argued that it is not a matter of following what the norm have stated to be moral but rather questioning the reason behind taking certain actions (Ross 37). Mill on the other hand in his utilitarian ethical theory based standards of living an ethical life on the ability of one to achieve maximum happiness from the…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The second formulation is the ‘Principle of Ends not Means’, it works on the basis that all people are equal and therefore it is wrong to exploit others or use them for personal benefits. This formulation shows how Kant had a respect for the value of humans, which is obviously important for an ethical theory; Kant believed that all people were an end in themselves. It also displays the importance of intention. You shouldn’t carry out an act that you know will treat someone as just a means, even if it benefits a greater good (contrast to utilitarianism). Kant thought that through helping others gain happiness (not treating them as just means) we also developed our own moral perfection- this also links in with Kant’s desire for a better society overall.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialist ethical theories maintain that consequences are the basis of moral evaluation. In other words, our decisions are considered either right or wrong due to their consequences (Shaw, 5). Followers of consequentialism support this premise by adhering to four essential principles. First, consequentialists abstain from disclosing on what is considered to be ‘morally valuable’. Agents of consequentialism never reference a moral framework which prescribes proper deeds, instead, they simply identify the morally correct action.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical ideologies are inherent and play a vital role in our decision to make moral decisions and whether or not those decisions are right or wrong. Two major philosophers that proposed two theories of ethics that gave an understand of what is right or wrong are Kant and Nagel. Kant theorized that the rightness or wrongness of actions doesn’t depend on our consequences but on whether we fulfill our duty. Nagel proposed the idea of Moral Luck and said that Moral Luck occurs when we judge an agent or assign moral blame or praise for an action or it’s consequences even if it is clear that an agent had no control in the situation. Through the theory of Moral Luck there are four types of non-moral luck that play a factor in the morality of an action…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moral Reasoning Theory

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The information from our course work coverage explains that human emotions and morals are inseparable because the emotions play a critical role in guiding moral reasoning and morals of a person. In fact, both emotions and morals influence each other in modelling moral reasoning of a person (Jensen, Jessica & Niyati, 2015). Therefore, there is no way that they can exist independently. The research discussion lacks a philosophical basis by stipulating the morals and emotions do not have a unique interrelation in moral reasoning. In conclusion, the topic of the psychology of moral reasoning is important in understanding the psychological aspect that influence human behaviors.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant’s deontology and Aristotle’s virtue ethics are similar in that they both question one’s intentions when handling issues of morality. Virtue ethics asks that one looks within, while deontology asks that one looks towards rationality and duty. Respect for humanity is essential – deontology showing this respect through requiring that one never treat another as merely a means to an end, but in respect to their means and their existence as ends as well. Virtue ethics requires such respect by way of the definition of virtue itself, meaning that a truly virtuous person would not disrespect humanity in the first place, since such an action would not seem to come from a virtuous character. Though one’s motives are questioned in both cases, the…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whether we feel against or not we know the morally right thing and it’s our duty to care out our action. Apart from what is in the sense of good will nothing else is considered to be good. He says that when guided to do what’s good in by morality there is no seeking for the reward. The simple reward is doing the right thing. When based off of feelings as for a reward for doing the right thing then it is not morality.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays