Moon Landing Hoax, Neil Armstrong first was the first man on the moon, at least said to be. It’s hard to believe in 1969 that there was basically a space ship created to land on the moonhaving a man walk the first steps there. At the time small objects of new technology was being created such as a mouse for a computer, ATM’s, barcode scanners. Comparing the new technology being created at that time to a space ship on the moon with men aboard it’s difficult to believe; however, a few years after 1969 can make a bit more common sense. Neil Armstrong evidently landed on the moon, only, not until a few years after 1969.
There has been numerous amounts of claims towards evidence to support both sides of claims whether Neil Armstrong did or did not …show more content…
The numerous amounts of companies that supported spending huge quantity of money argued by Fraser Cain on Universe today claiming “According to them, they spent $24 billion, which is more than $150 billion in inflation adjusted dollars. Their so-called “Apollo” program allegedly employed 400,000 people, supported by more than 20,000 companies and research institutions” (How Do We Know the Moon Landing Isn’t Fake?). Not many people would go to the extreme to try and fake all their supporters if being supported as Nasa and Apollo 11 was in 1969 to prep for the moon landing. Although there are people who can decide to go that far and if not make up a fake story to try and make them more popular and ear money from what people may want to hear: Moon Landing Hoax. Cain continues to show where it basically where the fallacies had been started, “More than 10 years ago, Fox popularized the Moon landing conspiracy with a show called “Did We Land On The Moon?”. They revealed several pieces of evidence about the hoax and cover-up citing incorrect shadows on the Moon, lack of background stars, and more. Each of the pieces of evidence they present is wrong and easily explained once you understand the underlying science” (How Do We Know The Moon Landing Isn’t Fake). Cain has a proven how it would be idiotically for the moon landing to be fake; yet, he’s shown where the conspiracy theories
There has been numerous amounts of claims towards evidence to support both sides of claims whether Neil Armstrong did or did not …show more content…
The numerous amounts of companies that supported spending huge quantity of money argued by Fraser Cain on Universe today claiming “According to them, they spent $24 billion, which is more than $150 billion in inflation adjusted dollars. Their so-called “Apollo” program allegedly employed 400,000 people, supported by more than 20,000 companies and research institutions” (How Do We Know the Moon Landing Isn’t Fake?). Not many people would go to the extreme to try and fake all their supporters if being supported as Nasa and Apollo 11 was in 1969 to prep for the moon landing. Although there are people who can decide to go that far and if not make up a fake story to try and make them more popular and ear money from what people may want to hear: Moon Landing Hoax. Cain continues to show where it basically where the fallacies had been started, “More than 10 years ago, Fox popularized the Moon landing conspiracy with a show called “Did We Land On The Moon?”. They revealed several pieces of evidence about the hoax and cover-up citing incorrect shadows on the Moon, lack of background stars, and more. Each of the pieces of evidence they present is wrong and easily explained once you understand the underlying science” (How Do We Know The Moon Landing Isn’t Fake). Cain has a proven how it would be idiotically for the moon landing to be fake; yet, he’s shown where the conspiracy theories