Montag, is shown to be a person who comply with rules.This is shown by Montag saying ,"It was a pleasure to burn…a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed" (Ray 1). This demonstrates that Montag had no feeling of blame for his actions and that he trusted that there was nothing bad with what he was doing. Clarisse is different compared to Montag. Moreover, this is clearly shown in the conversation she had with Montague." Do you ever read any of the books you bum? … Is it true that long ago firemen put fires out instead of going to start them? ... There's dew on the grass in the morning ... "And if you look" she nodded at the sky "there's a man in the moon" (Ray 4), the quote tells that Clarisse is a curious person. The distinction is in all likelihood a consequence of the author's goal to show how provocative inquiries and talk with individuals who like to think out about the case can help a man begin thinking himself. Furthermore, the change in Montag's reasoning after his discussion with the Clarisse is critical in indicating how just a short presentation to provocative inquiries is sufficient to conquer the impacts of years of propaganda. To sum-up, Montag and Clarisse are introduced differently in order to show the criticalness of and the impact that target thought can assert over
Montag, is shown to be a person who comply with rules.This is shown by Montag saying ,"It was a pleasure to burn…a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed" (Ray 1). This demonstrates that Montag had no feeling of blame for his actions and that he trusted that there was nothing bad with what he was doing. Clarisse is different compared to Montag. Moreover, this is clearly shown in the conversation she had with Montague." Do you ever read any of the books you bum? … Is it true that long ago firemen put fires out instead of going to start them? ... There's dew on the grass in the morning ... "And if you look" she nodded at the sky "there's a man in the moon" (Ray 4), the quote tells that Clarisse is a curious person. The distinction is in all likelihood a consequence of the author's goal to show how provocative inquiries and talk with individuals who like to think out about the case can help a man begin thinking himself. Furthermore, the change in Montag's reasoning after his discussion with the Clarisse is critical in indicating how just a short presentation to provocative inquiries is sufficient to conquer the impacts of years of propaganda. To sum-up, Montag and Clarisse are introduced differently in order to show the criticalness of and the impact that target thought can assert over