Monsanto's Business Ethics

Decent Essays
First let’s take a look at Monsanto’s business ethics. Their ethics can be described in one way, with is bad. Through everything they have done, it seems they rather kill thousands of innocent people to make a buck. Monsanto has done so many things over the year that it’s surprising the company can still exist, let alone thrive. This first example is how Monsanto mask information on their products and even lie on them to make their products seem safer. When looking at Round-Up, one year the bottle said “Biodegradable” and the next year it didn’t.(Robin) This is a problem, because the formula did not change, which means they had no right to put it on the bottle to begin with. By lying on their labels with makes it seem safer than it actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary of Monsanto’s Harvest of fear by Barlett and Steele The summer day in 2002 at the town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City. Gary Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his "old-time country store," as he states. When a stranger walked in and issued his threat. As Rinehart would recall, the man began to verbally attack him, saying he had proof that Rinehart had planted Monsanto's genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company's patent.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Swot Analysis Monsanto

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The rise of groups against genetically modified organisms practices puts Monsanto in a compromising position with stakeholder groups. On of the core values of Monsanto is “dialogue” (Who We Are, n.d.). As Monsanto’s CEO, the best way to approach stakeholders is by engaging in conversation with stakeholders, discussing their issues with production, and testing out some of the suggestions pertaining to seed production. These actions show that the Monsanto brand stands by its responsibility to provide quality service to customers. In addition, it proves to stakeholders, consumers, farmers that their loyalty to the brand is not taken for granted.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monsanto is a powerful company with a history of making what many would find questionable or unethical business decisions in the quest for profits. “Many stakeholders are concerned about the moral and safety implications of genetically modified food” (Ferrell & Hartline, 2014). If I were Monsanto’s CEO, to balance the conflicting needs of the variety of stakeholder groups that the company must successfully engage, I would first place labels on the products. Although the FDA determined Americans do not need to know when they consume genetically modified products the company would state the fact on labeling like it does in other countries. Also, I would continue to donate to programs that focus on improving communities in developing countries.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘ Why Does Monsanto Sue Farmers Who Save Seeds?’ gave the reader’s facts, background information for the company and showed why Monsanto can be trusted regarding their laws and regulations. Readers would likely agree that abiding by seed infringement laws is just as significant as following other rules after reading this article. By using rhetorical techniques Monsanto gave a compelling argument in favor of their patent laws and why they pursue the wrongdoing of those…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Monsanto’s Harvest of fear” Analysis Monopolizing on a certain product is a business practice that has been used for decades. While this practice is extremely beneficial to those who succeed in doing it, it is simultaneously harmful to every other business owner, usually smaller franchises, in the same line of work. While the one large business continues to profit, the smaller business owners usually go out of business or, if they’re lucky, loses an extremely large percentage of their sales. This is what Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele try to illustrate through their usage of both pathos and logos in “Monsanto’s Harvest of fear”, in which they attempt to get the readers to view big businesses as agricultural bullies.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear”, by Donald Barlett and James Steele; there are claims made that state that Monsanto is the ruler of all of the United States food production. Monsanto produces genetically enhanced seeds that resist many weed killers such as their own product, Roundup. By doing this Monsanto has put a patent on these seeds, this means that farmers have to buy Monsanto’s product. But, when farmers buy the seeds they have to sign a contract agreeing to not reuse them, so that they are required to buy more. Monsanto is so strict on this policy that they have hired Gestapo like subjects called “seed police” to go check farmer’s fields.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monsanto Swot Analysis

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Our society is facing some big challenges, like combating climate change, utilizing water and other resources more efficiently, and making a more balanced meal accessible for everyone. No one organization or company can do it alone, and Monsanto is certainly not an expert in all areas, so we partner with others like scholars and researchers at major universities to tackle some of these big…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Openness In Georgia

    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S. Right to Know, a non-profit receiving funding from the organic foods industry, requested thousands of emails from researchers at state universities with ties to the secretive company, exposing email chains and money trails that detailed an extensive network of research and advocacy. The New York Times published an article evaluating the findings, explaining how prominent academics, such as Professor Wayne Parrott of University of Georgia, are involved not only in exploratory research in agrichemistry, but also in promoting the findings to policy makers. Many of these academic were recruited due to their prior advocacy- advocacy independent of corporate influence and based in their interpretation of the research. By channeling this activism, Monsanto bolsters their case and gains credibility while providing a platform for the scientists’ work. However, Monsanto’s monopoly of specific crop strains has rendered them a public enemy in the field of anti-GMO and food safely advocacy, causing public interest groups to attack affiliated professors who may be using public funds to advance Monsanto’s…

    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are starting to feel that Monsanto is gaining monopoly, the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service, over the world’s food crops and its control over seeds is a threat. (topsecretwriters.com) From 1997 to present day, Monsanto has filed lawsuits against an average of 9 farmers per year for 16 years because the farmers “improperly reused their patented seeds.” Since they started they haven’t lost a single case they they have filed. There have also been farmers that have tried to…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holocaust Vs Monsanto

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Genetically Modified Holocaust Everyone in the world needs three basic requirements to live-- air, water, and food. Out of the three needs in life, one if more appreciated and outshines the rest.. Food. Food has tv shows and its own network, not to mention there are tons of social media accounts focused entirely on food. Food connects countries and continents, and leave options to explore different cultures through food.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Curse Of Roundup

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roundup is Monsanto’s most profitable product and defines its rise from near bankruptcy as a result of Agent Orange in the 70s. “The Millions Against Monsanto campaign was created to fight Monsanto for creating Agent Orange and Roundup (glyphosate) and other toxins that threaten human health and the environment” (Millions Against Monsanto). Roundup has facilitated Monsanto’s rise as the top seed producing company, which holds all the rights and patents to seeds to the extent that farmers cannot replant their seeds, and Roundup is the primary reason that this can occur. From the perspective of farmers, Roundup has been a blessing and a curse.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Monsanto Persuasive Speech

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    However, their history is not so much the same as their present day status; their previous business involvement was with chemicals and plastics (7). Many chemicals that Monsanto made in the past are now considered carcinogenic and most definitely illegal today. Just a few of the chemicals they are credited with creating are the now-banned dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), the now-banned polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB’s), the controversial recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) and Aspartame, and the infamous chemical Agent Orange used in Vietnam. Monsanto was also tapped into by the United States Government to help in the development of the atomic bomb (7-8). With this controversial use technology they had then brought their biotech knowledge into the field of agriculture in the 1980’s, and have now become one of the leading companies of agricultural biotechnology in the world…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barlett and James B. Steele is a short essay published in 2008 by Vanity Fair talking about the way Monsanto treats their customers, their workers, and how they do not seem to care about the general public. Monsanto created a genetically modified seed that was capable of withstanding “its own herbicide” and allow farmers to have a “convenient way to spray fields with weed killer without affecting crops” (819). Because they are the bigger company, they often try to contact farmers into buying their seeds and to not collect the ones from their crops at the end of the harvesting season. This has resulted in the farmers having to lose out on profits (they had to buy new seeds instead of using their own) and regular customers having to eat these modified seeds without properly checking it first. With Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear, Barlett and Steele tries to inform their audience about not only Monsanto's shady ways of earning profits, but the overall corruption in the agricultural market.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Monsanto Ethical Issues

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Transforming the agriculture industry and making large profits, Monsanto has generated controversy and fears with some of their stakeholders. Attempting to make farming easier, and increase the food supply throughout the world, they could be making harmful impacts on human health and the environment. Monsanto desires to be a beneficial, transparent, respectful, and understanding organization. They have gone against some of their values while trying to be innovative and return profit to their shareholders. Their approach to revolutionize the agriculture industry has put their conduct in question, and diminished the reputation of the organization.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This impact can be reduced by the company by putting more efforts and investment in development and research to improve and eliminate the side effects of their products without much damaging the environment. Furthermore, Monsanto can employ a team to regularly check whether the negative effects are still being possessed by their products and if it so then the authorities can be alarmed about this and suitable actions can be taken against this…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays