Monsanto Project: Business Analysis

Improved Essays
Through the three parts of the Monsanto project, (the process, the paper, and the presentation), I’ve gained new writing skills and insight from my partners I will use in further writing such as the upcoming transnational corporation assignment. The overall researching and writing process as a group was simple because my group was easy to work with and each individual contributed in researching, writing, and presenting. Researching was fairly straightforward and did not require much digging around because there is a ton of information about Monsanto, Monsanto history, lawsuits, and the food industry in general online. We split up our research so that everyone looked up a different portion of our focus of intellectual property (IP). This was a successful way to find as much about Monsanto as we could. My group had such an overload of information that it was not necessary to use all of what we found to make our argument.
Our group first decided to write the entire paper together. Due to scheduling conflicts and a lack of time, we were forced to split up the essay into
…show more content…
On the Monsanto corporate website, the company responds to issues that have been brought to light like their method of patenting their product, the restrictions they place on farmers, and their history of suing farmers. I wrote about how Monsanto insists they only do what is best for both society and their farmers, and that patenting their product is their right and a common practice. If I had a chance to rewrite my portion, I would try to expand and connect my argument to other sections in the essay, specifically the section on how Monsanto was given the right to patent their seed, or on the section that focuses on how Monsanto’s actions still put farmers in an undesirable predicament Given more time, I would try to find statements from Monsanto in court cases against

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary of Monsanto’s Harvest of fear by Barlett and Steele The summer day in 2002 at the town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City. Gary Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his "old-time country store," as he states. When a stranger walked in and issued his threat. As Rinehart would recall, the man began to verbally attack him, saying he had proof that Rinehart had planted Monsanto's genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company's patent.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monsanto is a powerful company with a history of making what many would find questionable or unethical business decisions in the quest for profits. “Many stakeholders are concerned about the moral and safety implications of genetically modified food” (Ferrell & Hartline, 2014). If I were Monsanto’s CEO, to balance the conflicting needs of the variety of stakeholder groups that the company must successfully engage, I would first place labels on the products. Although the FDA determined Americans do not need to know when they consume genetically modified products the company would state the fact on labeling like it does in other countries. Also, I would continue to donate to programs that focus on improving communities in developing countries.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘ Why Does Monsanto Sue Farmers Who Save Seeds?’ gave the reader’s facts, background information for the company and showed why Monsanto can be trusted regarding their laws and regulations. Readers would likely agree that abiding by seed infringement laws is just as significant as following other rules after reading this article. By using rhetorical techniques Monsanto gave a compelling argument in favor of their patent laws and why they pursue the wrongdoing of those…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They began by informing the audience “… in 1980 the U.S. supreme court, in a five-to-four decision, turned seeds into widgets, laying the groundwork for a handful of corporations to begin taking control of the world’s food supply”(Barlett and Steele 133). They also go on to say “…Monsanto has become the world leader in genetic modification of seeds and has won 674 biotechnology patents, more than any other company, according to the U.S. Department of Agricultural data” (Barlet and Steele 133). This history was put in so that the authors could depict how an unnecessarily large company that took advantage of a fairly common product and used it to get an upper hand on its smaller competitors, forcing them to succumb to the larger company’s new rules of agriculture. It was beneficial to the overall piece because it did just…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear”, by Donald Barlett and James Steele; there are claims made that state that Monsanto is the ruler of all of the United States food production. Monsanto produces genetically enhanced seeds that resist many weed killers such as their own product, Roundup. By doing this Monsanto has put a patent on these seeds, this means that farmers have to buy Monsanto’s product. But, when farmers buy the seeds they have to sign a contract agreeing to not reuse them, so that they are required to buy more. Monsanto is so strict on this policy that they have hired Gestapo like subjects called “seed police” to go check farmer’s fields.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monsanto Swot Analysis

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Our society is facing some big challenges, like combating climate change, utilizing water and other resources more efficiently, and making a more balanced meal accessible for everyone. No one organization or company can do it alone, and Monsanto is certainly not an expert in all areas, so we partner with others like scholars and researchers at major universities to tackle some of these big…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Openness In Georgia

    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S. Right to Know, a non-profit receiving funding from the organic foods industry, requested thousands of emails from researchers at state universities with ties to the secretive company, exposing email chains and money trails that detailed an extensive network of research and advocacy. The New York Times published an article evaluating the findings, explaining how prominent academics, such as Professor Wayne Parrott of University of Georgia, are involved not only in exploratory research in agrichemistry, but also in promoting the findings to policy makers. Many of these academic were recruited due to their prior advocacy- advocacy independent of corporate influence and based in their interpretation of the research. By channeling this activism, Monsanto bolsters their case and gains credibility while providing a platform for the scientists’ work. However, Monsanto’s monopoly of specific crop strains has rendered them a public enemy in the field of anti-GMO and food safely advocacy, causing public interest groups to attack affiliated professors who may be using public funds to advance Monsanto’s…

    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature has enslaved people since the beginning of time. As humans have developed they have overcome oceans, plagues, nomadism, and other organisms. Most recently scientists have created means to overcome the biological constraints of agriculture, and the plant that has contributed the most is corn. Pollan stated. “corn has done more than any other species to help the food industry realize the dream of freeing food from nature’s limitations.(91)” thesis Modern corn now is genetically changed to have the qualities wanted in corn commodity.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My paper is about Monsanto’s lawsuits against farmers. I think that Monsanto is still a problem for many family farms in America. To solve this problem I think that the people that are involved in approving the lawsuits need actually look at the situation instead of the money. A majority of the problem is that Monsanto is a huge company that just keeps getting bigger with a ton of money behind it and the farmers that they are up against are just small family farms that don’t have the money to fight the lawsuits that are thrown at them. Usually the farmers just pay the fine instead of fighting the lawsuits because it is cheaper to just pay the fine than it is to stand up and try to prove that you didn’t do anything wrong.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The informative speech I gave on Wednesday about “GM Foods” did not go better than I expected that I could have done because I felt time pressure to organize a verbal outline as closer to written outline. On the topic “GM Foods”, my rhetoric was mainly to inform audiences about negative impact of GM foods on human health. The most difficult part of this informative speech for me is the topic selection. Going through the struggle of finding the topic of large public/audiences interest which can lead to audience inclusion and positive public discourse, I finally found the topic of public concerns/interest but doing research on the topic found all controversial proposition and opposition to the arguments of positive and negative impacts of GM…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author, Matthew Feldmann identifies that there have been recent arguments about the safety of GMOs, or Genetically Modified Organisms. He particularly notes that most debate has come in the areas of crops, specifically rice and soybeans, some of the staple crops of diets worldwide. He uses the rhetorical device of logos, a way of persuading the targeted audience by employing reason or logic, by claiming that although “foods derived from GM crops have been consumed by hundreds of millions of people across the world for more than 15 years,” the public remains mostly uninformed of what GM plants actually are, thereby unknowing of the potential advantages, disadvantages, and range of applications for which they can be used (Key, Ma, Drake).…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She applies statistics such as “in 2010, as much as eighty-six percent of corn, up to ninety percent of soybeans and nearly ninety-three percent of cotton grown were GM varieties” (42) to logically convince her readers most of the foods they consume are genetically modified. Also, she uses testimonies like Doug Gurian-Sherman’s (a writer from the Union of Concerned Scientists) to provide hard evidence how genetically modified seeds are underexamined (45). Also, she presents two Purdue scientists, Professor Huber and Professor Johal, who claim in a paper written in 2009, “the widespread use of glyphosate… can significantly increase the severity of various plant diseases, impair plant defense to pathogens and disease and immobilize soil and plant nutrients” (45). These testimonies promote her claim that GM foods have safety issues. Likewise, she employs facts into her argument to support her claims.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holocaust Vs Monsanto

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Monsanto’s cause has been violent and in the legal system more than once. Monsanto has sued more than four-hundred and ten farmers for using their seeds in cross parenting and general field growth without purchasing or proper licensing (Johnson, 4). On the other hand, in the Percy Schmeister vs. Monsanto Canada Inc., Monsanto tried to sue Percy for misuse of their crops, but they didn’t expect he would counter sue Monsanto for cross-contaminating his fields. Most farmers that have been sued didn’t have proof to counter against Monsanto, but Percy’s case sparked a reaction Monsanto didn’t expect. According to Amy Glasscock “Schmeiser discovered his plants were contaminated when he sprayed a three-acre test patch of his farm located near the road with Roundup”…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Monsanto Ethical Issues

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Transforming the agriculture industry and making large profits, Monsanto has generated controversy and fears with some of their stakeholders. Attempting to make farming easier, and increase the food supply throughout the world, they could be making harmful impacts on human health and the environment. Monsanto desires to be a beneficial, transparent, respectful, and understanding organization. They have gone against some of their values while trying to be innovative and return profit to their shareholders. Their approach to revolutionize the agriculture industry has put their conduct in question, and diminished the reputation of the organization.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Omar Akhtar Southeastern OSU-MKT5243 February 11, 2018 Monsanto Case Study 1. If you were Monsanto’s CEO, how would you best balance the conflicting needs of the variety of stakeholder groups that Monsanto must successfully engage? To balance the interest of various stakeholder groups, we need to first identify the stakeholders and analyze their needs and expectations from Monsanto. The basic stakeholders for Monsanto would be its suppliers, customers (the farmers), consumers of the food items being manufactured from these seeds, employees of the company, investors, shareholders and the society in which the company is based.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics