Because so many environmental and ecological activist groups have been vehement in their criticism of
Because so many environmental and ecological activist groups have been vehement in their criticism of
Summary of Monsanto’s Harvest of fear by Barlett and Steele The summer day in 2002 at the town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City. Gary Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his "old-time country store," as he states. When a stranger walked in and issued his threat. As Rinehart would recall, the man began to verbally attack him, saying he had proof that Rinehart had planted Monsanto's genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company's patent.…
The rise of groups against genetically modified organisms practices puts Monsanto in a compromising position with stakeholder groups. On of the core values of Monsanto is “dialogue” (Who We Are, n.d.). As Monsanto’s CEO, the best way to approach stakeholders is by engaging in conversation with stakeholders, discussing their issues with production, and testing out some of the suggestions pertaining to seed production. These actions show that the Monsanto brand stands by its responsibility to provide quality service to customers. In addition, it proves to stakeholders, consumers, farmers that their loyalty to the brand is not taken for granted.…
Monsanto is a powerful company with a history of making what many would find questionable or unethical business decisions in the quest for profits. “Many stakeholders are concerned about the moral and safety implications of genetically modified food” (Ferrell & Hartline, 2014). If I were Monsanto’s CEO, to balance the conflicting needs of the variety of stakeholder groups that the company must successfully engage, I would first place labels on the products. Although the FDA determined Americans do not need to know when they consume genetically modified products the company would state the fact on labeling like it does in other countries. Also, I would continue to donate to programs that focus on improving communities in developing countries.…
Our society is facing some big challenges, like combating climate change, utilizing water and other resources more efficiently, and making a more balanced meal accessible for everyone. No one organization or company can do it alone, and Monsanto is certainly not an expert in all areas, so we partner with others like scholars and researchers at major universities to tackle some of these big…
When does an object become a patent? In some cases when a possession is not in your hands anymore it no longer belongs to you. But in other cases it can still be your possession no matter where it is. There are very odd cases where problems like this arise.…
People are starting to feel that Monsanto is gaining monopoly, the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service, over the world’s food crops and its control over seeds is a threat. (topsecretwriters.com) From 1997 to present day, Monsanto has filed lawsuits against an average of 9 farmers per year for 16 years because the farmers “improperly reused their patented seeds.” Since they started they haven’t lost a single case they they have filed. There have also been farmers that have tried to…
However, the lawsuit was dropped in 2013 when both Monsanto and Dupont agreed to end the lawsuit and actually decided to work together (Huff 2013). Monsanto will license DuPont to use their patented GMO-seed formula. This joint venture between the top contenders of the agricultural industry is essentially making the biggest monopoly on GMO-seed by joining forces. In conclusion, Monsanto has all the characteristics of a monopoly. They are now one buyer to many sellers, with the help of DuPont at their side.…
In almost all of the lawsuits, there is clear evidence that Monsanto knew the dangers of this chemical. In their code of ethics, it states their duty to protect the environment and "We take our commitments seriously and strive to resolve these liabilities responsibly." (Monsanto. (2017). If Monsanto were dealing with these obligations…
Monsanto shows that the number of farmers they sue in America for violation of contact is just a small percentage from their overall number of clients. I feel that this is a good reason of justification on their part giving solid statistics to back their reason. Also as a side not from the lawsuits Monsanto wins it donates the proceeds to scholarship programs and youth leadership initiatives.…
Question five asks what I think of Monsanto’s “seed police” and if the seeds should be protected. The question goes on to ask if the seeds should be affordable to even the poorest farmers. I will answer these questions from three different perspectives. The three perspectives are as a business professional, as a stakeholder, and as a member of the community at large. As a business professional, I think companies have a general right to their intellectual property.…
Controversy about Monsanto 's business practices arose when the company patented their genetically modified seeds and essentially monopolized the seed industry due to its success. Farmers who choose not to use Monsanto 's seeds had occasionally experienced field contamination from the seeds and were subsequently sued as a…
This article is simply judgmental. Although over a hundred years old, Monsanto has become a broad name amongst college…
Monsanto has a group of people to investigate and prosecute farmers if farmers save some seeds. I think this company and the U.S. government have centralized power to against farmers who really produce…
Barlett and James B. Steele is a short essay published in 2008 by Vanity Fair talking about the way Monsanto treats their customers, their workers, and how they do not seem to care about the general public. Monsanto created a genetically modified seed that was capable of withstanding “its own herbicide” and allow farmers to have a “convenient way to spray fields with weed killer without affecting crops” (819). Because they are the bigger company, they often try to contact farmers into buying their seeds and to not collect the ones from their crops at the end of the harvesting season. This has resulted in the farmers having to lose out on profits (they had to buy new seeds instead of using their own) and regular customers having to eat these modified seeds without properly checking it first. With Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear, Barlett and Steele tries to inform their audience about not only Monsanto's shady ways of earning profits, but the overall corruption in the agricultural market.…
This impact can be reduced by the company by putting more efforts and investment in development and research to improve and eliminate the side effects of their products without much damaging the environment. Furthermore, Monsanto can employ a team to regularly check whether the negative effects are still being possessed by their products and if it so then the authorities can be alarmed about this and suitable actions can be taken against this…