Summary Of Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

Great Essays
In the very words of Hobbes, in his work the Leviathan, man in the state of nature are equal and their desires alters there destiny in life. Hobbes saw that men are equal being, and what triggers them to be in conflict is there desires which happens to be the same. According to him, men, in the same desires will try to race to achieve that desires and war of all against all occurs. Many century had passed and the war of all against all has happened. It devastated and traumatized the humankind. Due to such reason, men aimed to protect their mortality and associated themselves with others to be as one state with one that governs and protect them from chaos and help them to survive. Such government acts as the promoter and the one that maintains order in the state. In few years past different kinds of states was created with their unique kind of government.
The thought of peace and security was positively foreseen after the creation of states. But sad to say it had actually open the doors to the most terror war of the existence of mankind. The war of all men against all men was replaced with states against states. The World War I and II erupted wherein countless lives of people are wasted and weaker states are buried and the need for a great Leviathan, in the international sphere, was a gain needed. To commence the war, as the leaders of the
…show more content…
It has been proven that international law and municipal law is supreme in its respective jurisdiction and that both of their legal element contained within the domestic and international systems respectively to be observed depending on the case at bar. In cases wherein states, in there international obligation and as they do their acts outside of its sphere and sometimes even domestically, they are both bound to observe each others jurisdiction and practicability to promote order and manageable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For a while, the constraints of civilized society keep things peaceful, but soon their system unravels into brutal chaos” (Pojman, 67-68), this is an excerpt that Pojman discussed pertaining to the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding. This quote exemplifies Thomas Hobbes idea on the state of nature and how there can be no structure and stability without a governing force. Another philosopher that challenges Hobbes’ ideas is John Locke, who believes humans would be capable of keeping stability and structure without the social contract to the government. I will prove how Hobbes’ idea is significantly better than Locke’s theory by talking about equality, liberty, rights and morality. I completely agree with Thomas Hobbes and how humans would be incapable of governing themselves which is why we need social structure.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All of those people being superior in their own ways cancel each other out or at least make them neutral to each other. Hobbes suspects that no one person will ever become so powerful that all humans become their slave. According to Hobbes, all human beings are essentially equal; with only a few minor differences. Because they are all similar, they seek to have the same things. These desires that are alike can cause conflict once resources that are desired by multiple people are used up; resources on the earth are finite, unlike our desires.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of ownership has been interpreted in many ways throughout the years. Ownership is the state or right of possessing something, which draws certain protective security lines to close. This type of ownership protects its people and their land. The idea of ownership is powerful especially in our society today; however, in the political society we live in, we have to give up some of our ownership to be truly protected. As Americans we have natural rights that protect us and give us power but there are still things that the government can do or say to take your rights away in order to protect the greater good.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 1810 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hobbes is a firm believer that life is “nasty, brutish, and short” (2008). Man naturally assumes that he is better and more wise than the others, except for of course those who have established themselves with fame, and if two men want the same thing, they will compete for it. This results in the natural state to be extremely warlike (Hobbes 2008). Men fight for “gain,” “safety,” and “reputation” (Hobbes 2008). Man has to lock his own chest in his own locked house because of the chaotic state the world is in.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s motivation behind the book, Leviathan, is derived from the perception of a man and his intellect Hobbes purpose is to comprehend the condition of a man, which leads to the understanding of mankind, because the state of a man is nothing but artificial. To elaborate this notion, what dominates a man is his soul therefore the guidance is brought by a man’s joint and the consequences of an action are related to the nerves of a man. Hobbes claims the best way to understand mankind is to turn their thinking inwards and study oneself, which leads to understanding our thoughts, desires, and reflecting on the origin of these beliefs. According to Leviathan, the logical way to comprehend the thoughts of a man is through its senses; the…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes’ central aim in his Leviathan is to provide an explanation of why the state exists, but most importantly why it is justified in telling us what to do. To answer these questions, he imagines a world without political institutions, therefore in a state of nature. In chapter thirteen, he describes how this state of nature leads to a state of “every man against every man” (Hobbes, 1651: 84). Indeed, Hobbes’ thesis first provides the assumption that all men are equal, in the sense they have all equal ability and hope in attaining their ends. Given the scarcity of resources, from this equality of endowments men inevitably are led to compete against each other.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In some pacts people sought protection of their lives and property, and as a result of this a society was formed where…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this philosophical study, an evaluation of the dualistic ideology of “good and evil” will be examined in Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan. Hobbes effectively defines the skeptical aspects of human nature, which define human beings as a innately war= like and self-interested. These facts define the role of the “passions” in human behavior, which attempt to discern between the appetites and aversions of human choice, which force them to choose between an evil or a good co-existence with their fellow human beings. Keke’s (2012) philosophy also supports the contention that human beings tend to behave in malevolent ways (in a secular observation) yet…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan he describes the nature of man as one who lives in “continual fear, and danger of violent death: and the life of man solitary poor, nasty, brutish and short”. He describes this state of nature is a state of war. Hobbes states that the basic goal of mankind is to avoid an untimely death. Thus, the state of man is a state of self-gratification, self-service, and self-preservation.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays