Monarchist Criticism Of Tsar Nicholas II

Good Essays
Sergei Podbolotov is an instructor of Russian and European history, teaching primarily on the courses of Russian civilization. He is the author of multiple scholarly articles, covering subject matter from national problems in the Russian Empire to Russian nationalism and conservatism. In addition to this, he is a recipient of IREX awards for research. In his work, Monarchists Against Their Monarch: The Rightists Criticism of Tsar Nicholas II, he addresses the criticism of Tsar Nicholas II from the point of view belonging to the monarchists. Though there was a positive side to the monarchist movement, there was a very negative side to it as well, and they believed that the Tsar himself caused the crisis of the autocracy. Podbolotov structures …show more content…
For revolutionaries, they were not concerned as to who was sitting on their throne, but they saw the Russian system as one that was by definition headed by a tyrant who was an oppressor of the people. Due to Nicholas II’s personal qualities, he was thought to be unfit to be the ideal monarch. Podbolotov does call attention to the fact that the objective circumstances of the era that ultimately prevented the Tsar from reigning “autocratically” were not taken into account by conservatives. Yet, Monarchists’ attempts to influence Nicholas collided with his lack of indifference and initiative, which were attributes that were deemed unsuitable for an autocrat. Podbolotov also explains that the criticism of the Tsar strengthened from the defeats in the Russo-Japanese War and the Tsar’s “childish desire” to conquer Manchuria. B.V. Nikol’skii was a critic that had made a positive impression on Nicholas II for his thoughts about the need for autocracy in Russia, and, Podbolotov includes a passage from his diary which reveals his true thoughts about the say, and it …show more content…
Many others believed that with a Tsar like Nicholas, the autocratic course was destined for failure. The presence of Rasputin also gave the people, especially the monarchists, a very negative outlook of Nicholas II, but the tsar was blinded by his family concerns. Podbolotov describes that by 1917, the irritation of the Tsar was at new heights. A group called the “progressive Nationalists” had entered the Progressive Bloc leading up to 1917, joining the opposition. The tsar’s “faithful people” began to rise up in opposition for the good of society, and this as well became more universal among monarchists. Though there were some that still remained loyal to the regime, the vast majority sympathized with the opposition. For the influential group of the progressive Nationalists, it was evident that the Romanovs were leading their country towards a catastrophe. Podbolotov concludes that the reaction of relief was not surprising when the Tsar abdicated in February 1917, as his whole reign had been criticized for the type of ruler he was, and the ways that he had failed the Russian people as an autocrat. Tsar Nicholas II’s incompetence stimulated a crisis of the already inefficient system, and he worsened things as he showed favor to right-wing politicians in attempts to secure support for his regime. Climactically, his attempts only ended in the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    During the pre revolutionary Russian revolution was incompetent; Nicholas could not manage Russia’s vast population and stop anyone who oppose or try to help him. He was always suspicious of anyone that might pose a threat to his sovereignty. Additionally, his advisors and top officials were fundamental bases on loyalty than skills. The government was inefficient and corrupted. A historian Richard Pipes argues that,”the revolution was the result not of insufferable conditions but of irreconcilable attitudes of a clash between those who wanted sweeping changes in government and a government whose ruler refused to change anything”(Collapse of Tsarist Russia).…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, these atrocities made Germany very vulnerable, and lead to the rise in power of Adolf Hitler. On the contrary, although the Treaty failed in many ways, some people believe that it was not responsible for World War II, and that the worldwide depression was the main factor. First of all, the treaty greatly offended Germany, and caused them to want revenge. The Treaty of Versailles was very offensive towards Germany, causing them to want a retaliation, which resulted with the start of World War II. The Treaty of Versailles,…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since the early 1600’s Russia had been ruled by the Romanov family. The final Tsars were increasingly ineffective and when Tsar Nicholas II came into power he did not fix the mistakes of the past Tsars and due to his bad leadership he is solely to blame for bringing his country into ruin which in turn led to his downfall, however, the people of Russia were eager for change because of the mistakes of the past Tsars and Nicholas II could not govern the entire country and keep them from wanting a revolution. During the course of Nicholas II reign he made various mistakes that contributed to his downfall. Nicholas II’s father, Alexander II, brought a police of Russification which stated that the non-native people of Russia must give up their…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The line “…by authorities whom We shall appoint” clearly shows how the Tsar is reluctant to give his people their rights as he wanted to keep his power and the system of Autocracy in Russia. This can be amplified in a letter to his ‘dearest mama’ on the 2nd of November, 1905, “…this terrible decision, which I nevertheless took quite consciously” further reinforcing the fact that Nicholas II was not sincere in improving his own nation from the release of the October Manifesto . The contradicting statements in the October Manifesto further stimulated the growing discontent of the people as the rights that they are given are still limited by Tsar Nicholas. As Trotsky states in 1905, “Everything is given and nothing is given”. Therefore, the release of the October Manifesto was a key event…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, according to Nikolay Shmelev, the Russians would not have been able to persuade our main partners in the West without those concessions. The unbearable imperial burden insisted by the conservatives has brought the country nothing but strain and ruin. Gorbachev has helped developing a new image for the USSR. Gorbachev himself has made a response, ‘Critics at home have also charged that we lost our allies in Eastern Europe, that we surrendered these countries without compensation. But to whom did we surrender them?…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The most explicit of these differences is in what they find to be the underlying causes of the collapse. For Fitzpatrick tsarism collapsed because of a combination of social and economic pressures. Taking the exact opposite stance Pipes explicitly states, “the principle causes of the downfall in 1917 (as also in 1991) were political, and not economic or social.” However, Fitzpatrick does write that the economic conflicts in tsarist Russia “were likely to turn political.” While she does concede that the worker strikes in Russia were political, the root of the cause for Fitzpatrick still lies in social conflict. When reading Fitzpatrick there is a sense of inevitability to the collapse of tsarism, however in Pipes’ book he focuses much more on the “accidents” of history. Throughout his explanation he brings up that no one saw the collapse coming, he later goes on to explain the success of the Bolsheviks in this same way.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marxist Reforms In Russia

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As illustrated, Russia’s strategic failure, on failure being out of the World War led to the indignation at the strategic failures at the front with war weariness and mistrust of the monarch. After the war, Russian revolutions revolted against the dysfunctional monarch. Considering that the revolution was based on Feudalism, the monarchy had to be ousted since it blocked the legitimate of the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Machiavelli suggests that it would be better to be feared than loved however the Tsar failed to be either of the two, despite the fact that at the start of the film he was loved and respected by his people. 4. The lack of industrialization in Russia plays a vital role in the outcome of the war and the actions of the Tsar and the people in general. The traditionalist views of Nicolas, to seek power through war and conquest and his refusal to industrialize and modernize his country combined with the war against the much more technologically advanced German army and state are some of the main reasons for his…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For instance, Russia was affected politically due to its tsarist autocratic government. Tsar Nicholas II desired to maintain the current autocratic system, and was the successor of his father Alexander II. However, Tsar’s leadership was dismissive and weak. Russia was prideful and arrogant regarding the Russo-Japanese War, therefore greatly underestimating Japan’s strength. Thus, the overconfidence evident in Russian government led to poor military strategies and leadership.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Cold War had a variety of causes and consequences that affected the world superpowers at the time. There were many positive and negative effects of the Cold War. Most of these effects fell in favor with the U.S. and led to the demise of the Soviet Union. Even though the U.S. and the Soviet Union were allies during World War II, they disagreed on the way they wanted to bring about change in the world and thus became enemies. “Together, these nations and others brought about the downfall of Hitler's Third Reich.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays