Fathers owned their daughters and made the decisions for them. If a woman was to speak against, act against, or love against their father’s will, hethat man could destroy his property by killing her. While A Midsummer Night’s Dream is was a Shakespearean comedy, in which there is always a happy ending entailed for the characters, Hermia’s triumph over her father was an intentional detail added by Shakespeare. He did not agree with the archaic concept of father’s deciding their daughter’s love and he believed the notion of Athenian Law to be ridiculous. Shakespeare wrote constantly about love and appeared to be a passionate person, as was reflected in his writing. He found it foolish that one human would be able to take away another’s freedom and to choose who they loved. This same disdain for Athenian Law and the nature of father-daughter relationships at the time is illustrated by Hermia when she expresses: “Oh, hell, to choose love by another’s eyes!” (1.1.140). Although she dealt with numerous obstacles on her path to true love, Shakespeare ensured that she would overcome Egeus’ threat to kill her, and in return, marry Lysander. Therefore, when Theseus overrules Egeus’ wish to execute Athenian Law on Hermia, Shakespeare is voicing his own belief that fathers choosing their daughtersn's husband was …show more content…
Puck viewed the mortals as fools and this was true within the play, and to Shakespeare himself. He believed that humans were fools for losing control over themselves after falling hopelessly in love, allowing fathers to treat their daughters as property, being boastful, and not being able to separate illusion from reality. As an individual observing from outside the society, the fairy Puck finds the dilemmas the humans endure to be silly and amusing, which is a reflection how Shakespeare felt during his