The question of “Why is it that Aboriginal people who have ‘mixed blood’ are the ones who succeed in life” will be deconstructed and explored in different sections and headings. Study and research will be focused on ‘mixed blood’ and the stereotypes that accompany the word and its culture. Further deconstruction will look into what it means to succeed and how it relates to the question posed that will be followed by what the social determinants of ‘mixed blood Aboriginals consist of and how equity versus equality play a big part on the access to resources is impacted differerntly.
Stereotyped and representation by media outlets:
Deconstructing this question the world ‘mixed blood’ has a big impact on the question. The term ‘mixed blood’ is …show more content…
This being where a male or female, “were born with access to power and resources” (reference) The form it takes looks to represent Ethnocentrism, "thinking one 's own group 's ways are superior to others" or "judging other groups as inferior to one 's own". (reference) This expands into Social Determinants of ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals who until the 1967 referendum did not have the same rights of what Australian did, this including the right to “vote, marry whom ever the chose, move to where ever they chose, own property where ever they chose, receive the same pay for the same work, this being enlisted and ruled by the Australian constitution. (Reference) This had huge repercussions on Aboriginal health, working opportunities, education and equal opportunities compared to the rest of Australia. (reference) These past events have continued to follow the Aboriginal people and the the in which they are viewed by the public. Many are subdued to overcrowded housing conditions, poor access to health services and no trust in the health service. (reference) While the 1967 referendum gave rights to many ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginal what needed to be considered is equity versus equality. (reference) The resources may have been given to each aboriginal for them to use, however, equality won’t work in this case as the platform is not high enough to speak up. Equity is what is truly …show more content…
The view on this topic with assimilation shows the stereotypes that’s are placed on not only Aboriginals but also ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals. This lead to the stereotype assumption that is it only ‘mixed blood Aboriginals that can succeed in life. Further analysis shows that the view and very interruption on what succeeding is varies between people and cultures. The questioner may have seen that ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals are the ones that succeed in life as their actions are what they see as success, generally in wealth in the current case. While research into Aboriginal showed that they see success in connection with the land, language and cultural experiences. Lastly viewed in this paper was the Social Determinants of ‘mixed blood’ aboriginals, this section scoped within white privilege, the 1967 referendum and the barrier of equity versus equality. This is connecting to the access of resources, education and health available thru different platforms for Aboriginals. In closing and deconstruction, it was believed the questioner to be uneducated in the composition of this question. This leaving a mark of racist appearance by suggesting that only ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals can succeed in
Stereotyped and representation by media outlets:
Deconstructing this question the world ‘mixed blood’ has a big impact on the question. The term ‘mixed blood’ is …show more content…
This being where a male or female, “were born with access to power and resources” (reference) The form it takes looks to represent Ethnocentrism, "thinking one 's own group 's ways are superior to others" or "judging other groups as inferior to one 's own". (reference) This expands into Social Determinants of ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals who until the 1967 referendum did not have the same rights of what Australian did, this including the right to “vote, marry whom ever the chose, move to where ever they chose, own property where ever they chose, receive the same pay for the same work, this being enlisted and ruled by the Australian constitution. (Reference) This had huge repercussions on Aboriginal health, working opportunities, education and equal opportunities compared to the rest of Australia. (reference) These past events have continued to follow the Aboriginal people and the the in which they are viewed by the public. Many are subdued to overcrowded housing conditions, poor access to health services and no trust in the health service. (reference) While the 1967 referendum gave rights to many ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginal what needed to be considered is equity versus equality. (reference) The resources may have been given to each aboriginal for them to use, however, equality won’t work in this case as the platform is not high enough to speak up. Equity is what is truly …show more content…
The view on this topic with assimilation shows the stereotypes that’s are placed on not only Aboriginals but also ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals. This lead to the stereotype assumption that is it only ‘mixed blood Aboriginals that can succeed in life. Further analysis shows that the view and very interruption on what succeeding is varies between people and cultures. The questioner may have seen that ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals are the ones that succeed in life as their actions are what they see as success, generally in wealth in the current case. While research into Aboriginal showed that they see success in connection with the land, language and cultural experiences. Lastly viewed in this paper was the Social Determinants of ‘mixed blood’ aboriginals, this section scoped within white privilege, the 1967 referendum and the barrier of equity versus equality. This is connecting to the access of resources, education and health available thru different platforms for Aboriginals. In closing and deconstruction, it was believed the questioner to be uneducated in the composition of this question. This leaving a mark of racist appearance by suggesting that only ‘mixed blood’ Aboriginals can succeed in