Missouri Compromise In Uncle Tom's Cabin

Improved Essays
After the Revolutionary War, slavery was an extensive and a very difficult issue all over the nation. Furthermore, Missouri Compromise was a compromise when Missouri entered the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state and this law prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36° 30´ latitude line in 1854. The slave trade became more profitable in pro- slave states after this compromise. Subsequently, the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which is an act passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The attitude of Southern American people toward slavery …show more content…
Tom just wants to be a good child of God in whatever situations he would be. As believer of God, he just did what he thought was right. “The incorruptible fidelity, piety and honesty, of Uncle Tom…” (Stowe 371). The commentary of Abraham Lincoln regarding Uncle Tom’s Cabin to its author would have been just an opinion as of many in that time bringing up to encounter feelings and prejudice of the individual’s skin color. Uncle Tom’s Cabin, in that time helped to be an eye opener of several individuals that were on the edge to keep forever the ideology of skin color should be a fact to stereotype to enslave souls. The novel becomes a push to open ways to abolish slavery in the United States. Events like the writing of this book caused the indifference in a great part of society toward slavery; however, over the time, it changed the way of thinking in America society. Even though, skin color is still an issue today in America and around the world, there always be generations who can change this subject by seeing each other as a humans being with no color or race to build a better society and eventually a better

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If I were to compare Uncle Tom’s Cabin to another story, that would be, Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist. Since the stories’ focus was the racial discrimination of black people to white people long time ago. Oliver and Uncle Tom are both religious people though they’ve experienced slavery. They never lose their faith to God no matter how cruel and difficult the world is to them. They have both found their selves in several situations where their faith in God is severely tested.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In and before 1820, tensions were high in the North and the South because of slave states vs. free states. The free states were afraid that the slave states would have too much power in the Senate. Therefore, the Missouri Compromise was born. Missouri became a slave state, and Maine joined as a free state. They chose which parts of the Louisiana Purchase would become slave territory and which parts would not.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Missouri Compromise- March 3, 1820 tensions began to rise between the anti-slavery North and the pro-slavery South. tensions soon came to a boiling point in 1819 when Missouri wanted to enter the Union as a slave state. This would disrupt the balance between the free and slave states. there were 11 free states and 11 slave states. To keep things even, there was a two-part compromise, which missouri was to enter as a slave state but Maine had to enter as a free state, making the numbers 12 to 12.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was created to replace the Articles of Confederation, since the Articles of Confederation granted too little power to the federal government, which caused Shay’s rebellion. Within the Constitution, there are laws that both limit and give power to the federal government and other laws that protected citizen’s natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness or property. The Constitution that was once the cause of national unity caused the Union to split into two separate sides: the abolitionist North, and the slave-holding South. The reasoning of this is mainly due to the Constitution’s ability to adapt to changes according the circumstances.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise The 1800s were a dark time in our nation where disagreements over political power, and the conflict between free and slaves states occurred. There were several disputes and battles over land and the morality of slavery. Although a dark time in the United States, this was also a push for a better future. New ideas and policies circulated around this time period in an effort to seek compromise between the states and eventually end slavery.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the years leading up to this compromise, tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups began to rise. The major boiling point at the time arrived when Missouri sent a request to join the Union as a slave state. This upset the other states because for them to become a slave state, it would cause and unbalance. To keep the peace, Congress created a two-part compromise, giving Missouri their request, but also admitting the state of Maine as…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the United States government took many steps to try and prevent sectionalism and tensions because of territorial expansion, the tensions between the North and the South In 1819 Missouri had a big enough population to be admitted into the union. However Missouri requested to be admitted as a slave state which would disrupt the balance in representation in the Senate. Congress enacted the Missouri Compromise which would admit Missouri as a slave state, admit Maine as a free state as well as outlawing slavery north of 36°30. This was criticized by many southerners because it established the principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery. Thus resolving the crisis it did not help settle conflicts and eventually Missouri was repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. This compromise agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and then admit Maine as a free state to keep the balance of free and slave states in the country. It also created the 36’ 30° line. The 36’ 30° line was an imaginary line on the southern border of Missouri above which it was agreed new states could not hold slaves. Many in the south saw this as an act in support of the abolition of slavery, which helped to increase tensions between the north and south over the issue of slavery (Missouri n.d.).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays