Misogynistic Behavior

The behaviors of Clinton, Trump, and the voters have all been influenced by stimuli, and the candidates are well-aware that their statements act as additional stimuli to voters, so they have to make certain that their statements are vastly supported in order to obtain the majority of votes when it comes time for the general election. The voters recognize that America has been heavily impacted by phobia-ridden sentiment recently due to terrorist attacks by ISIS who claim to be acting in the name of Islam. These Americans have learned to fear all Muslims due to extensive media coverage that focuses on terrorism. In the minds of some of these voters, the massive amount of coverage attributed to terrorism has led them to believe that all Muslims …show more content…
Although she had been calm, she became thoroughly upset and disgusted as the topic of Trump’s misogynistic behavior continued. During sensitization, a stimulus, such as the interpretation that the moderators harbor a political vendetta against the candidate, or sexist behavior, caused an increased emotional response in between the candidates, which was shown through their behaviors like arm flailing or eye-widening by Trump and Clinton, …show more content…
The voters also became sensitized when Clinton admitted to obliterating so many of her emails, since most of them had been operantly conditioned as children to learn that being dishonest is wrong, and Clinton shouldn’t have destroyed the emails when she had, according to Trump, received a mandate from the United States Congress to report evidence, which included these emails. As humans, it’s necessary for people to be in-tune to their external surroundings in order to interpret beneficial, harmful, or significant information, and to successfully adjust their behavior accordingly in order to react effectively to these stimuli. Therefore, in order to benefit from information presented to them, it was necessary for Trump and Clinton to review polls and public opinion to refine or maintain their opinions in public policy to achieve the most votes in the future. Likewise, in determining the best candidate for supreme public office, it was necessary for the voters to respond effectively to the candidates’ responses to their questions by agreeing with the candidate who had the best answers. All humans, especially those in a highly competitive environment, which is characteristic of presidential debates, must know how to respond to external