Miscegenation Laws In America

Superior Essays
America is the land of the free and the home of the brave. Many people have immigrated to America in the hopes of finding freedom. There is no one nationality or ethnic group that belong to the United States. We are a melting pot of many nations, but America holds a deep secret. A secret that affected the rights of many of our citizens to marry the one they love. It was only fifty years ago on June 12, 1967, that the Supreme Court repealed all miscegenation laws giving heterosexual couples of different races the option to marry one another. Miscegenation laws date to the 1600’s with Virginia being the first state to make interracial marriage illegal. There seems to be on common theme behind the miscegenation laws, the fear of interracial sex. …show more content…
Miscegenation laws were established to protect the purity of the white women and the purity of the white race. One of the first anti-miscegenation laws passed in Virginia in 1662. These laws spread throughout the colonies. By 1914 forty-one states had laws that prohibited interracial marriage. One of the problems that arose early on was how to classify the children born of mixed race couples, referred to as mulattos. Ultimately mixed race children would gain their status from their mother as they were often illegitimate offspring of slaves and white …show more content…
. The first recorded interracial marriage took place between Pocahontas and John Rolfe in 1614. Interracial marriages were not encouraged because African Americans were considered the inferior race. Miscegenation was developed as a way for the white man to maintain control over politics, sex, and discrimination. Sexuality is at the core of miscegenation laws. Miscegenation prevents blacks from obtaining the same type of status as whites. After 1662 any minister in Virginia who married an interracial couple was fined 10,00 pounds of tobacco. By 1691 any white woman who had mulatto children was fined or became an indentured servant for five years while her child received thirty years. In Maryland, a white woman who married a slave became a slave. Interracial cohabitation was also illegal in Maryland. There were many interracial births during slavery as rape was a common occurrence among slaves and their white

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    By 1662, for instance, a black woman in service was no longer referred to within the statutes as a servant, but, rather, a “negro woman” (Masters, page 3) who is “slave or free” (Masters, page 3). Bastards or other persons of mixed white and black ancestry were referred to derogatorily as “mulattoes”, and grouped with those of African descent at the bottom of the social order, unable to receive any of the luxuries their “whiteness” would allow. The white population’s self-determined racial identification was also clearly emphasized within the written laws, with white men and women being specifically referred to as white men and women, instead of merely masters or mistresses, thus establishing themselves as independent and superior to those outside of their demographic. Moreover, by 1666, “…the prevention of that abominable mixture and spurious issue…by negroes, mulattoes, and Indians inter- marrying with English, as by their unlawfull accompanying with one another” (Masters, page 3) became the focal issue of the legislature, as opposed to those of the past which were broader in nature and concern. Illicit sexual relations both interracially and within the slave population were now openly and blatantly…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blue Vein Society, marriage was mostly based on skin color, education, wealth and social standing. Slave marriages were based on slave or freeman asking for the hand of female they were attracted too. They would have to ask permissions by slave masters to take that female in marriage. Those marriages were only symbolic and after the war they were not honored unless the two people who were married during slave time wish to continue being married.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Loving v. Virginia changed what the concept of marriage was. Marriage was first between a man and a woman of the same race. That is what marriage stood for in the early years, no interchanging races. However with this case, interracial marriage became legal. What was once forbidden and different became normal.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growth Of Slavery Essay

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thus, a series of slave codes was established to limit the rights of slaves. The colonies took after the Caribbean model of human labor, such as disallowing slaves to own guns, create contracts for their labor, and not allowing slaves go anywhere without their master’s permission. Taking such example, in 1639, Virginia implemented a slave code declaring that everyone is able to bear arms other than the blacks, and if they were caught holding ammunitions they would receive twenty lashes for violating the statute. In 1663, Maryland legalized slavery and proposed a law stating that all blacks would remain as slaves regardless of their mother’s status. In the following year, another law was issued punishing the marriage between a white woman and a black slave.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, if white man got a black woman pregnant both parties ended up being punished. The black woman would get whipped and the white man had to confess his sin and face punishment. The lawmakers did not want the blacks and whites to reproduce together because they were not considered equal. Next, if a slave resisted their master it was said that they would be punished in a violent manner. Many times the punishing of a slave would even lead to the murder of that slave.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slaves did not have any rights because they were considered property of their owners. The slave owners had absolute authority over their human property. In Louisiana law: “The master may sell him, dispose of his person, his industry, and his labor; [the slave] can do nothing, possess nothing, nor acquire anything but what must belong to his master” (“Slavery”). Things were not always as bad as they were there. In the very early part of colonization, in places like New Amsterdam, blacks enjoyed privileges that would later be denied to enslaved blacks.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike the plantation owners, and to some degree indentured servants, the blacks had no political or judicial clout either in England or in the colonies. The political and judicial establishment, completely controlled by the planters, created laws that safeguarded their economic interests at the expense of the enslaved Africans. Even the indentured servants did have one important right: the right to the courts. “Legal considerations, however laxly regarded, imposed some limits, as did the realization, at least in North America, that some of the mistreated would eventually command free status and political influence.” From the court records, there is evidence that servants often sued their masters for grievances such as excessive punishment, freedom due to…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subconscious fears of miscegenation with the negroes and white Americans led to legal restrictions on free Negroes and also Slave Codes sanctions. In 1662, Virginia regulated any intercourse with a negro man or woman and also doubling the fine for the act. Also, Maryland went on to regulate interracial marriages in 1664 and calling the Negroes a "disgrace of our Nation" and "shameful Matches." The insufficient amount of rights that the free Negroes had were taken away in a progressively…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jim Crow laws were state and local laws used to enforce racial segregation in the Southern United States. These laws lasted for decades until their ban only 52 years ago in 1965, but their presence is still felt today. After the Jim Crow laws were banned, a new wave of segregation took over with the Separate but Equal Act. Although the name of the act makes it seem as if all races were on the same level of social, political, and economic equality, the harsh reality is the exact opposite. Black communities were required to use different facilities such as schools, diners, restrooms, and even drinking fountains.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1970s, if you were someone who was interested in the same sex as yourself, you could understand the day by day difficulties of being accepted by society because this was not considered proper. The general views of Americans were very different from the views of Harvey Milk at this time. The actions that Harvey Milk took towards gay rights stood out. In the Mid-1970s, Harvey Milk worked to promote gay rights and for everyone to be equal. Milk was successful in making a change by being the first openly gay man elected into public office and influenced many gays and gay supporters.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, Marriage Equality is a very hot topic. Same sex marriage is now legal throughout America. Many people are not happy about it, but some people are. This topic will always be very questionable topic in America. A lot of people do not believe that gays should not be allowed to be married, but for now they are.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our society, there are several incidents where some people believe it is not correct to be in a relationship. One of these, conflicts, interracial relationships, is still happening today. Nearly fifty years since the law was passed and even longer since the end of slavery, and there are still people, who believe such an idea to be disgusting or immoral when in reality, it does not affect society in any way. In 1967, the Supreme Court had decided state bans on interracial marriage were unconstitutional.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The true purpose of marriage Gay people fight for marriage equality but they forget the true purpose of marriage. Historically hhomosexuality where two individuals of the same sex are having a relationship has been a taboo subject and in some countries it is discouraged and/or illegal. In recent years homosexuality and gay marriage has been openly expressed and many countries have either legalised or a currently debating its legalisation. Despite what is happening in some countries Australia still maintains that marriage should be between a man and a women. Ireland which is a very conservative and religious country held a referendum to legalise gay marriage and the people of Ireland voted "YES" to gay marriage.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, the one thing that holds them back is the law. Many states in the U.S banned homosexual marriage due to the fact that marriage between man and woman has been around for the past millennia. Lots of people thinks that same-sex marriage is one of the reasons that and that it supposedly wrecks the balance between traditional marriage and the balance between man and woman that’s supposed to equally balance the differences and family to create a brand- new creation to create man and woman as one. Phooey. People don’t know who is able to enforce marriage.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same sex marriage was never legally wrong until 43 years ago, when Maryland banned same sex marriage in 1973. Before state prohibition, a clerk denied two men from the University of Minnesota a marriage license, “On May 18, 1970, two University of Minnesota students, Richard John 'Jack ' Baker and James Michael McConnell applied to Hennepin County District Court clerk Gerald Nelson for a marriage license. He denied the application, because the applicants both were men.” In the same case the court ruled based on its own opinion instead of written law, “The trial court was not impressed with the argument, agreeing with Nelson. The state Supreme Court agreed with the lower court.”…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays