• Home Page
  • My Favorite Court Case: Miranda Vs. Arizona Case

My Favorite Court Case: Miranda Vs. Arizona Case

Great Essays
Show More
I choose to do my research paper on one of my favorite court cases in American history Miranda vs. Arizona case. I’m choosing this court case because it brings up two amendments that tend to be overlooked by law enforcement comes around and one of the most well-known sayings. First I will be giving a quick background about those two amendments and then I will start talking about the case. The issues about this case involved the fifth and sixth amendment. Let me explain both of these amendments. “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or …show more content…
Is that law enforcement must read you your Miranda right’s whenever they hamper your freedom in a significant way? For example, being arrested or being detained. Now a great deal of people when arrested ask for a lawyer. Then the lawyer tells them to keep their mouth shut through the police integration. This becomes a little bit of a gray area when it comes to terrorism, though the reason is because they could be hiding time sensitive information and if the public is under serious threat they will not mirandizes them till the threat has been lifted. A suitable recent example was the Christmas day underwear bomber he was mirandized a few hours after he was arrested.
These are a few exceptions to Miranda rights. While many people today believe that anytime a law enforcement officer talk to they must invoke the Miranda rights, but this is just a short list of a few exceptions to what some of the people of society believe. An abundant deal of people believe they are not obliged to talk to a police officer at all or show requested document such as name, date of birth, age, gender, …show more content…
Made the law enforcement officers more creatively and critically. Also in countries like Vietnam if you are accused of a crime, you will be beaten until you admit to the crime, then they beat you again as punishment for doing the crime. If you deny committing the crime, they beat you up as well and the only way to be “proved” innocent is paying off the police or a politician which leads to a corrupt system. Which even though the Miranda rights are not a contusional right they are deeply rooted into our society to help prevent police corruption which in turn protects

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Charles Dickerson On Miranda Rights
    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Charles Dickerson On Miranda Rights

    During the time of the debate on Miranda rules police officers are put in an…

    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Warning: The Purpose Of Miranda V. Arizona
    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning: The Purpose Of Miranda V. Arizona

    According to Memphis criminal attorney J. Jeffrey Lee, if police fail to read a Miranda warning to a person in custody being questioned, the police cannot use self-incriminating information obtained from the person. Cornell University's Legal Information Institute notes that this is part of the Exclusionary Rule. The purpose of the Miranda warning is to protect the Fifth Amendment rights of a person in police custody from coercive police interrogation explains Carl A. Benoit, J.D.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Criminal Justice System: The Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona
    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Justice System: The Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona

    There area series of policies that we need to follow in order to make an arrest. We need to follow the legal procedures in order to be able to arrest someone and take their freedom away from them. People have the right to just walk away from us if they don’t want to talk to us if they haven’t created a crime. In other words if we just randomly walk up to someone they don’t have to stay and talk to us. Miranda VS.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Public Safety Exception To Miranda Research Paper
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Public Safety Exception To Miranda Research Paper

    The public safety exception to Miranda rights is when an officer or law enforcement agent questions a interrogates without telling them their rights if the safety of the public or other officers are in danger. I completely agree with the public safety exception to Miranda as it can allow officers or agents to gain valuable information to prevent somebody from getting injured or possibly killed. For example if police apprehend a suspect that may be involved in a terrorist attack officers don’t read them their rights and they most likely will talk and give the officers information as to whether the attack is going to happen, when, who else is involved, and in the event of a bombing where a bomb may potentially be. It can also help if officer…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Vs 5th Amendment
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14th Amendment Vs 5th Amendment

    In addition, the Miranda rights are provided under the 5th amendment, which further ensure proper due process and protects a person’s right to liberty. Due process in the 5th amendment happens through court proceedings and protects someone suspected of a crime. With the 14th amendment, due process is a given right to limit the governments interference with, and control over, personal affairs of the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief Summary
    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief Summary

    In a 5-4 decision for Miranda, it was ruled that anyone convicted must be told their rights, which we know refer to as Miranda Rights that must be told to anyone taken into custody. This is backed by the 5th Amendment. 5. Bush v. Gore 531 US 98 (2000) The petitioner was George W. Bush and the respondent was Albert Gore.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizon A Case Study
    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizon A Case Study

    The Miranda warnings originated in the Court ruling of Miranda v. Arizona and became mandated to read to a suspect who is in custody and is going to be interrogated (Hall, 2015). In order for Miranda to apply, the court must determine several factors. The court must determine if the suspect was in custody, if an interrogation transpired, if the suspect’s statement was in direct response to an interrogation, if the government used the statement for prosecutorial reasons to prove guilt, and if “the need for Miranda protections outweighs other governmental needs” (Galloway Jr., 1988, p. 797). If all of these factors were determined to be valid in the case in question then the court must determine if the arresting agency were in compliance of…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Should Miranda Rights Have Freedom Infringed?
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Should Miranda Rights Have Freedom Infringed?

    The Constitution created a set of amendments to the Bill of Rights and these rights are meant for the citizens of the United States and the government cannot be able to take away these rights. In most cases, the rights of the people can be infringed due to the government officials such as the police officers they are meant to protect public safety. But towards the people who are being accused should not have their freedom infringed this is known as Miranda Rights. Miranda Rights are a set of laws placed after the ruling of Miranda v. Arizona where the accused was not offered a lawyer and Mr. Miranda was prosecuted and he was not informed of his 5th and 6th amendment. Miranda Rights are warnings given announced to the accused before an interrogation…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Warnings
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warnings

    In the 1966 landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona, came one of the most well known court decisions in America, which requires Miranda warning be read to a suspect by law enforcement (Hall, 2014). Miranda warnings regulate interrogations, confessions, and admissions. These are also protected by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, which give people the right from self-incrimination and the right to council respectively (Hall, 2014). The right of self-incrimination is the basis for having the Miranda warnings, which also notify a suspect they are entitled to council (Hall, 2014). Basically, the court said in order to protect suspects right to self-incrimination, the government has to notify that person of their right to remain…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional Rights In America
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Constitutional Rights In America

    Being read Miranda rights warns the terrorist and also the witnesses are able to be confronted by the terrorist. Questioning a witness could provide the terrorist with leverage or other information that the terrorist could then use in their trial. With precautionary measures, it is easier to build a case file on the terrorist and potentially build an even greater case. In the court of law, after all this person put the country through, they have a better shot at winning case because of their rights provided by the…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Miranda Rights Important
    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Why Is Miranda Rights Important

    Not only is it the law to be aware of your rights but a lawyer can be presented to provide counsel. Even in cases where officers may know for 100% someone has committed a crime, the moment they forget to tell them their Miranda Rights and the person confesses, the defense…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    Arizona can also be put into the frame of judicial activism. The Supreme Court created a new law, bypassing the elected legislative branch of government, in order to protect the rights of the accused. The law that requires police to read the defendant the “Miranda Rights” not only helps to protect the defendant from self-incrimination under duress, but it also reduces police violence and other forms of intimidation that could lead to a false confession. The new law protects the rights of the accused and changes the behavior of the police towards arrests and interrogations, reconciling growing police powers with individual basic…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V State Of Arizona Essay
    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda V State Of Arizona Essay

    When a law enforcer, such as a police officer, interrogate a suspect, they must inform the suspect about their constitutional rights beforehand. These rights include the right to remain silent and not answer questions, the right to consult an attorney before and during the interrogation, an attorney can be appointed even if one cannot afford it, and that everything the suspect do or say will be used against them in court. Miranda rights are important not only due to the fact that it will protect one’s right against self-incrimination, but it also guarantees that the information that investigators have gathered are legally…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Importance Of Suspects In Law Enforcement
    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Importance Of Suspects In Law Enforcement

    The court ruled that suspects must be informed of their rights before and after questioning. Law enforcement must prove that they have informed he person of their rights and make sure the person understood. When an officer reads a person the “Miranda Rights” or “Miranda Warning” it ensures that the person understands their rights and anything they say can be used against them in the court of law.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings