Miranda v. Arizona 1966 is the court case I chose to assess in how it changed the way law enforcement agencies comply with and work through the law. As mentioned previously, the Supreme Court was presented with this case in 1966, and it was in reference to interrogation tactics used by the police force. The Supreme Court justices used the 5th and 6th Amendments to explain the clauses regarding self-incrimination and the right to an attorney; the decision was passed with a 5-4 vote (Alvernia Universitiy Online, 2016).
Statements made by a defendant to police officers are now only advisable at a trial if the defendant was presented with verbal confirmation of their rights, as a result of this landmark court decision – these rights today are
Statements made by a defendant to police officers are now only advisable at a trial if the defendant was presented with verbal confirmation of their rights, as a result of this landmark court decision – these rights today are