They conclude that, when advised, a suspect would regularly ask for an attorney, which led to the denial of almost all confessions.
Tom C. Clark argued against the Warren Court, he said it went “too far too fast”. In addition, Clark used the “totality of the circumstances” test used in Haynes V. Washington. The test sought out if whether or not a police officer would read their rights before interrogation with the addition of informing them that they have a right to counsel during interrogation and that if not able to afford a lawyer they will be given one by the court. If the warnings are never mentioned, the concern would fall on the state to prove that he refused his rights, while also counting the failure of reading their