Miranda Rights Research Paper

Decent Essays
Do you know about the miranda rights? They are your rights as citizens. In a court of law, Officers tell you these rights. They can help you. in a court of law.
The miranda rights are used for, a silence warning by police, to criminal suspects. Before they are to irrigate( is questioning an individual about his crime or criminal activity. ), and take into police custody. Officers tell you these rights to the suspects to inform them of their rights. These rights tell you what you are entitled to. Things such as, you have the right to, To remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. You haves this rights. These rights were founded by a man named Miranda v. Arizona. Hes was trying to protect the suspect's, fifth amendment, as a citizen of
…show more content…
The miranda rights inform citizens their rights before the are put into police custody, and then in a court of law. There are four rights in total. They were founded by a man named Miranda v. Arizona. I personally like the fact that officers inform people of this rights, they are good to inform the person of their rights, and their fifth amendment. It shows respect to citizens and how the rights help them out, and these are my thoughts on the awesome miranda rights.

What is the difference between the Miranda Warning vs the Miranda Rights.
The Miranda Rights are your Rights that you are entitled to as a United States citizen.
The Miranda Warnings, When the officer tells you of your rights.
When is it required for the officers to tell you, or read to you the miranda rights? Whenever the person is in custody of that said officer, when they are accused of said crime, or criminal activity. What does it mean when said officer says, "Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law."?
It means watch what you say, it can be held against you during

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. What has been the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona on both law enforcement agencies and the court. -The arrested suspect must be told that they have the right to remain silent -The arrested suspect must be told that anything they say may be used against them in court -The arrested suspect must be told they have the right to an attorney with them before any questioning begins -They must be told that if they cannot afford an attorney an attorney can be provided for free -After they are told their rights and the arrested suspect says that they do not want an attorney and is willing to be questioned that they said so willingly and knowingly -The suspect has the right to turn off questioning any time after they have…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case pointed out that the 5th and 6th amendment rights included in Miranda won´t apply if a person didn´t have the legal rights in the first place. I believe the supreme court decision in Salinas v. Texas was accurate because without being interrogated and in custody there is no legal rights for the officers to give a person their…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did law enforcement officer violate Mr. Miranda Constitutional Rights of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments? Should confessions or statements attained from a suspect interrogated…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ruling of the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona helped justify the full knowledge of legal and citizen rights that a defendant has in court. The case aided both the detained suspects and police officers/suspects with the defendants being aware of what rights they have while their under custody while legal authority knew and recited what they have to say to an individual that place in…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you" (" 'Miranda' Rights"). The law enforcement personnel must warn the individual prior to any investigation using the Miranda Warning. The Miranda rights are the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, which are stated in the Miranda…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newton (2004) 369 F.3d 659; see Allen v. Roe (2002) 305 F.3d 1046 (where the objectively reasonable need be based on what the officer knew at the time of questioning); see also United States v. Jones (2001) 154 F.2d 617 (likewise, holding the public exception applicable where police knew the suspect had a firearm in the apartment unattended with children present). In determining the objectively reasonable need, courts consider whether the defendant might have or recently have had a weapon and that someone other than the police might gain access to that weapon and inflict harm. (United States v. Williams (2007) 483 F.3d 425.) Accordingly, Miranda warnings are not required where there’s an objectively reasonable need in protecting the police or public from immediate danger and statements stemming from custodial interrogation must not be…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As citizen of the United States we as a people are entitled to multiple rights. One of the most commonly recognized rights are the Miranda Right, which states “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it came time for the trial, the confession was question because evidence was sometimes presented that the person was not in their right mind at the time of confession or the person was under duress. The Miranda Rights are there to protect the citizens as well as the police. When the trial date comes, neither side can claim that anything illegal was done. Really, what are the Miranda Rights? The Miranda Rights are pretty much the same throughout the states only varying slightly in the wording.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the Miranda rights are provided under the 5th amendment, which further ensure proper due process and protects a person’s right to liberty. Due process in the 5th amendment happens through court proceedings and protects someone suspected of a crime. With the 14th amendment, due process is a given right to limit the governments interference with, and control over, personal affairs of the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Rights help protect citizens fifth and sixth amendments. The fifth amendment protects citizens from being forced to be witness against himself, while the sixth amendment assures that those arrested have a right to a public and speedy trial (Doc E). Together, the fifth amendment protects against self-incrimination and the sixth amendment assures that those arrested can not be held in jail indefinitely. The Miranda Warning read by officers specifically states that after one is made aware of their Miranda Rights, any confession or statements can be used against oneself lawfully (Doc J). Consequently, the Miranda ruling assures that one is fully aware of their rights and are also aware of the consequences if they choose to self-incriminate after being read their…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all have heard about our Fifth Amendment and the Miranda right. The Miranda right derived from the case Miranda vs. Arizona. In this case Miranda was charged with rape and kidnapping. The police made a mistake by not tell him he had the right to remain silent. When this went to court, it was overruled because Miranda’s Fifth Amendment was violated.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Warren Court Era

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is utilized every day to ensure the safety of the country. The (somewhat) trusted process has been to thank for many persecutions ending with the correct verdict; in the ideal situation, only the guilty are punished. Before establishment of the Miranda rights, however, things were quite different. People who were completely innocent may not have had the opportunity to receive a fair and equal trial due to financial issues or a lack of knowledge regarding freedom of speech. “Along with other Warren Court decisions, Miranda has increased public awareness of constitutional rights,” and what law enforcement can and cannot do to determine suspects as guilty.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Five Amendments

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whereas the Fourth Amendment uses probable cause to set up if a crime is, has, or is about to occur and an arrest can be made. Then the Fifth Amendment comes into play, with the questioning of a person who has been arrested and the rights to the arrested person, specifically the reading of Miranda Rights. In 1966, Ernesto Miranda’s civil rights from the Fifth and Sixth were found to have been violated during the investigation and following interrogation. The Supreme Court determined that anyone who is in custody and being questioned needs to be read his or her specific rights, which included: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays