The Quest For Justice In The First 48

Improved Essays
(INSERT TOPIC SENTENCE). In the Criminal Justice System, Miranda rights are one of the most important elements when making an arrest. When a law enforcement officer makes an arrest and decides to question the suspect, they must read the Miranda rights out loud. If the individual starts talking and incriminating itself before the police officers informs them about the Miranda rights, the information provided from the suspect will be inadmissible in court. According to Cole, Smith, and DeJong (2016), the Miranda rights are as follows:
Suspect must be told that (1) they have the right to remain silent; (2) if they decide to make a statement, it can and will be used against them in court; (3) they have the right to an attorney present during
…show more content…
One english concept from the episode of The First 48 was the use of “pathos”, which is the art of persuasion by use of emotion. The specific pathos that was used in this episode is intended to make the viewer feel sorrow and sympathy. The producer of this episode chose to emphasize the sadness of the loss of the lives of Yayehyirad Lemma and Yenenesh Desta to engage the viewer and force the viewer to mourn the loss of the lives along with the family and friends. The episode showed the victim 's friends, family and neighbors crying, and even mentions for a lengthy amount of time the murdered couple’s baby who no longer has parents. (INSERT PARAPHRASE WITH CITATION). This display was intentional, and was meant to compel the viewer to mourn the death of this couple with the loved ones. In english, pathos can be a major part of persuasive writing. Pathos can be used in many diFferent situations to make the viewer or reader feel many different things. The use of pathos can completely alter the way a consumer views a product. This often times can be scene in persuasive writing papers, when the writer causes the reader to feel a strong emotion in order to get his/her point across. The use of pathos can make …show more content…
Just as criminal justice and english concepts frequently relate to “real world” scenarios, criminal justice and english relate to each other in many ways as well. One significant way they relate to each other is with the idea of claims and evidence. In english, if someone makes a claim such as, “the girl is pretty”, the author must then backup that claim with evidence, possibly by describing exactly what makes the girl “pretty”. In criminal justice however, a claim may be “Michael killed Sally”. Just like in english, this claim will then need to have sufficient evidence to prove it to be true. This evidence could be physical/forensic (hair, fingerprints etc.), direct (testimony) or circumstantial, but is required to prove someone guilty of committing a crime. The episode of The First 48 uses claims and evidence as well. One claim that the episode makes is that Jeffrey Antal and Robert Franks do not get along. A neighbor and friend of Jeffrey used a simile in the way he described the relationship between Jeffrey and Robert, saying that they were “like two sticks of dynamite” (INSERT TIMESTAMP AND CITATION). The use of this simile to describe the relationship between these men gives the viewer a better grasp on how violent these men may be. The evidence to undeniably prove that these two men did not get along comes from the fact that Robert killed Jeff

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lisenba v, California (1941), Stein v. New York (1953), Gallegos v. Nebraska, 1951), Crooker v. California (1958), and Cicenia v. LaGay (1958) (Hemmens, 2014, p. 22). In another case, Gallegos v. Colorado (1952) the United States Supreme Court ruled that the confection a violation of due process after Gallegos who was 14 years of age at the time was denied his right to have contact with his mother (p. 22). The concerns that the cases cause among the liberal United States Supreme Court Justices consisted of cases displaying tactics by policemen in using psychological methods in getting suspects to confess (Hemmens, 2014).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you" (" 'Miranda' Rights"). The law enforcement personnel must warn the individual prior to any investigation using the Miranda Warning. The Miranda rights are the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, which are stated in the Miranda…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be argued that the time between 1787 and 1861 was the “golden age” of law because it the set the precedent and truly allowed the judicial branch to shape their power. The “golden age” as the American Legal History stated was an era of transformation that gave structure to an industrial America. While there were many flaws in the decisions made by the court, many of the cases during this time gave future generations legal history in how to deal with murder. Cases such as the Dr. John Webster Trial and the Knapp Trial crated verdicts that still hold true today. Dr. John Webster Trial…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I choose to do my research paper on one of my favorite court cases in American history Miranda vs. Arizona case. I’m choosing this court case because it brings up two amendments that tend to be overlooked by law enforcement comes around and one of the most well-known sayings. First I will be giving a quick background about those two amendments and then I will start talking about the case. The issues about this case involved the fifth and sixth amendment. Let me explain both of these amendments.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Title Date of Submission Miranda vs. Arizona The Miranda warning has become one of the most common statements used by police officers across all states in America. The court case of Miranda vs. Arizona set precedence in protecting the rights of alleged criminals when taken into custody by law enforcement officers. The ruling rendered has withstood the test of time in restructuring American criminal jurisprudence.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Rights help protect citizens fifth and sixth amendments. The fifth amendment protects citizens from being forced to be witness against himself, while the sixth amendment assures that those arrested have a right to a public and speedy trial (Doc E). Together, the fifth amendment protects against self-incrimination and the sixth amendment assures that those arrested can not be held in jail indefinitely. The Miranda Warning read by officers specifically states that after one is made aware of their Miranda Rights, any confession or statements can be used against oneself lawfully (Doc J). Consequently, the Miranda ruling assures that one is fully aware of their rights and are also aware of the consequences if they choose to self-incriminate after being read their…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Warning is designed to inform anyone in police custody the right to due process by adhering to the Fifth Amendment. Certain protocols and formality must be followed by implementing four things before conducting an interrogation. The defendant must first be informed that they have the right to remain silent (Hall, 2015). Secondly, they must be informed that anything they say can and will be used against them in a court of law (Hall, 2015). They should also be informed that they have a right to receive legal advice (Hall, 2015).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda v. Arizona The Miranda rights have continued to stay in the law enforcement system for many years now, but how they are read, and who they are read to is starting to be a conflict in today’s generation. Miranda rights have survived to this day, and revisions to the Miranda warning is being talked about based on who is listening and understanding their rights. The question of whether or not the way the Miranda warning is read should be changed is based on the targeted minors who do not understand what they are being read. Due to multiple cases when people were not protected against self incrimination, Miranda rights are read to protect suspects, and they will continue to be read so new generations are aware and understand the rights…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What do you think about the miranda rights.these miranda rights can also be called the miranda warning. Weah do you think it is important that cops read you your miranda rights. Another good question is what would happen if i did not read you your miranda rights, well if a cop doesn’t read your miranda rights then some people think they can escape punishment. the reason cops read you your miranda rights is if you're in trouble you might want to know what you can do to help your case. However A Cop still has to infer these to you.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most of the testimonies in this case are regarding the material evidence,…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, this only applies when the suspect is in custody. According to GetLegal.com, if both elements are not present, the police are not required to give Miranda warnings. Many landmark cases have addressed and debated over what the true meaning of "custody" and "interrogation," however the main definition to go by is that custody means to be arrested. Therefore, the standard a court will apply is objective as they give a fair choice, where they will ask whether the average person is aware of the circumstances and of their rights but would have felt free to leave the scene and remain silent. If the answer is no, the suspect is put in…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Warren Court Era

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Still today, the Miranda law stands steadfast at the helm of the American Criminal Justice System. In 2000, the Supreme Court “strongly reaffirmed its landmark Miranda decision, which requires police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to be represented by an attorney during interrogation.” (“Miranda warnings upheld, Supreme Court says right now deeply rooted”) Groups targeted by law enforcement would never see the light of day if it were not for the laws set in place demanding equal treatment within criminal handlings. American society changed drastically as a result of court decisions like Miranda v. Arizona; safety and equality became a reality for many people…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays