Milton Friedman's Views On Corporate Social Responsibility

Improved Essays
Corporate Social responsibility is a moral and ethical Standard of an organization. Everyone has a social responsivity to society, not just business but also individual’s .We all have to work towards building a better society. Some companies are philanthropist, having extent socially responsibility to its employees and the general community in which it operates. Some economists think a corporate social responsibility should be to maximize profit while others think it’s about giving back to the community and acting in an ethically and morally manner. One such economist is Milton Friedman, who believes that social responsibility of a corporation is to make a profit. Friedman argues that the only social responsibility of businesses is to make …show more content…
In contrast to Milton Friedman’s belief on corporate social responsibility Henry Mintzberg does not share his views. He is not in agreement with Friedman’s beliefs and he believed that companies had a civic duty to society. He believed that corporate irresponsibility is a cause of selfishness and has engulfed society. This problem is built on what he defines as half-truths and has caused a proverbial wedge into society. It can be said that society has become selfish due to the nature of people and the impetus on self-interest and self-satisfaction instead of providing for a community on a social and economic standpoint. In Mintzberg first fabrication he believes that we are all, in essence, an ‘‘economic man’’. As a society, we are obsessed with our own self-interest on maximizing our personal gains. With this notion, society is never satisfied we always want more. I do agree with his belief that individuals are willing to sacrifice a little of almost anything we care to name, even reputation for a sufficiently large quantity of other desired needs. It is my belief that when some people are in a disarray situation we each have a price. However, this does not include every member of society, for most people integrity and self-interest is basic values. Mintzberg believes that the fabrication of economic man drives a wedge of distrust into society between our individual wants and our social …show more content…
Not only will a company appeal to socially mindful consumers and employees, but will also make a difference in the community and the world we live in. I do believe that a corporation has a responsibility to develop a better or happier environment. Promoting social responsibility can benefit the environment, its customers, and its employees. One of the benefits of encouraging social responsibility in the workplace is the positive environment that is built for the employees. Also promoting social responsibility will attract more customers. I think we all have a role to play in social responsibility unlike Friedman, who thinks business should attend to the economic and Government should take care of the social aspect. An organization should not only be profitable, but also has a heart this according to Mintzberg It has been highlighted that it is hard to see a society free of selfishness. Is it possible? I do believe it is possible but will not be easily attained. To achieve this, we must go against the grain, go against the norm and what has already been instilled in society and the corporate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gibson (2000) also supports that it is not adequate for all stakeholders to be given an equal benefit because if stakeholders (other than the shareholders) are given power of influence over the business it is not fair that shareholders are not given, in return, power of influence over society’s communities and initiatives. (3) If the free-market is unable to solve social problems, the responsibility of the solutions should not befall corporate…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the contrary, he thinks that those who fall into the lower class should not be rewarded by the government through means of welfare programs. In his opinion, the act of taking money from the government without earning it is simply irresponsible. He thinks that when the government intervenes with economy in such a manner that they are simply encouraging poor behaviour. Browne’s opinions are similar to those displayed in Adam Smith’s book “Wealth of Nations”. Smith had a strong opinion that individuals should be free to work solely for themselves, and those who neglect to do so shouldn’t be rewarded for their lack of self interest.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this research paper I am analyzing that businesses and corporation’s social responsibility is to be socially responsible while increasing profits because that is what they are developed to do. The other factors that people argue should be the primary focus are important to the success of these companies, but are not the only primary focus. The social responsibility of a company is to increase profits, while at the same time, being socially responsible. What is social responsibility? Social responsibility is an ethical framework which suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, business ethical is essential for a company, no matter the company works for no-profit that create social value or it works for profit that creates economic value. In the short term view company social responsibility might bring the negative effect on shareholders’ value. But in the long term view it will make more profit to all the stakeholders. And the relationship between social value and economic value should be balance even supplement each other. Secondly, a company must be Social responsible or Corporate Social responsible, not just stops at the level of about legal issues.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Calkins and Jonathan Wight, first key criticisms toward Milton Friedman was about the description of the business manager role as to maximize profits for shareholders which is the CEO moral obligation. Calkins and Wight express their opposition to Friedman idea of narrowing the whole managerial concept on to maximizing profits because, profits play a big role in the market system in references to consumer’s preferences which is different from Milton Friedman concept. On Friedman point of view: There is a moral foundation required for a stable society and “Managers are to make as much money as possible for their owners and avoid other activities that reduce shareholder profits”. As it is emphasizes by M. Friedman:…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While also acknowledging this need, he is also in favor of the benefits of society at large without the benefits to shareholders. Friedman’s exposition is that in order to be good people we must do things that are morally correct and not cheat the shareholders. In the 1970’s Friedman discussed his knowledge on the social responsibility of businesses. He said that the main purpose…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Relativism

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although ethical standards are not easy to define with such different cultural standards, it is vital to a company to figure out a way to handle it in a socially acceptable way. Good ethical behavior creates better employees and an overall better company. With that, we can continue to have successful businesses…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article, if the framework that is used for core business is used for social responsibility, then CSR is a source of opportunity, innovation and competitive advantage. A new approach is proposed to develop a relationship between business and society that does not treat corporate success and social welfare as a zero-sum game. The framework which can be used by the companies to identify possible social consequences of action, to discover the opportunities to benefit the society and themselves, to discover CSR initiative to address, and to find the most effective way to do so. Successful corporations need a healthy society and vice versa. The effective integration of CSR can increase the opportunities, efficiency, innovation, heathy environment free from…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, there is no way for an average executive to know this. If someone ignores these warnings and attempts to give back to the community to gain some goodwill for their company, they would only be acting short sighted. Friedman says that this kind of behavior only reinforces the idea that the pursuit of profit is wrong and immoral, even when fair pursuit of profit is what a business is meant for (Friedman,…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays