Mill's View Of John Stuart Mill On Individuality

Improved Essays
Mill’s praise of eccentricity as a means of self-cultivation illuminates the philosopher’s unique view of discovering one’s self as a form of education. To break the chains of tradition and social authority and embrace one’s eccentricity seems, to Mill, to be a duty to both an individual and mankind. As Mill tersely claimed, “the despotism of custom everywhere is the standing hindrance to human advancement” (Mills, p.69). If an individual subscribes to Mill’s view on individuality, then they avoid the conformity of being a sheep in the crowd and get to experience society and politics from many different viewpoints and learn from the varied viewpoints of a non-conforming body of individuals. Despite this, Mills supports the idea of civilization

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s philosophy contained a limited government or the notion of laissez-faire (hands off)! Concluding that men should be given civil rights as long as no harm was done to anyone. John Locke claimed all mankind was equal, believing that State of Nature has natural rights to freedom, liberty and justice. Meanwhile, Hobbes posed the notion that man was inherently evil and needed a monarchical government but both were against the Divine Right and developed the ‘Social Contract’(Carol 2017).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s On Liberty and Marx’s The Communist Manifesto are both political works about how they believe the government should be run in which they both believe that the people should not be oppressed by the government or other people. However, both differ in their opinions of what type of form a government should be; Mill believes that the government should take on the form of liberalism where it plays a limited role on society that emphasizes on individual freedom and freedom from tyranny of the majority. Marx on the other hand, believes that communism is an ideal form for a government where it will emphasize equality for the people that will eliminate exploitation among one group of people over another. While Mill believes human nature is detached…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result, one will bring about originality. This helps lead to social progress because of one’s own criteria to make choices and one’s ability to acknowledge the different ideas people have. Mill believes that those who are forced to conform do not learn from others and he calls this “despotism of custom (Mill 70).” In contrast to this view is Karl Marx idea that such individuality does not lead to cultivation of the self, but rather intensifies the inequality between classes and creates exploitation through private property. He also believes that a conformist society is best.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essentially, Mill is under the belief that the modern state of governance and law is no longer necessary as it once was to benefit society. Instead, society (largely through mass mentality) is now disadvantaged by this current manifestation of tyrannical rule. In order to combat this dilemma, Mill asserts that society must effectively progress (or regress) away from mass institutionalization, which promotes the notion of uniformity and discourages the notion of individual expression. In several of his subsequent notions, Mill is certainly correct. For example, it must be necessary to respect the individual rights of the minority in order to achieve true fulfillment of democratic values.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of speech is an issue that transcends time. In a recent and controversial case, Maclean’s magazine was accused of publishing hateful and Islamophobic content that, (from the complainant’s point of view) allowed for no opportunity to be countered. There are parallels between John Stuart Mill’s work On liberty and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enacted by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau on what boundaries to place on such a precious liberty. Both generally conclude that a person’s freedoms must not be infringed upon unless they harm others in society. Does the publishing a critical opinion of one’s religion constitute as harm?…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stuart Mill Conformity

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill disapproves of individuals who complacently allow external influences to mold their opinions, desires, and life goals. Mill emphasizes this disapproval by stating, "He who lets the world…choose his plan of life for him has no…other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation" (Mill 56). Imitation is the equivalent of conformity, a practice that detracts from a truly democratic society. The tone of disdain, with which Mill regards blind conformity, is apparent throughout the text. Mill praises the traits of firmness, self-control, and deliberation—traits that present themselves in individuals who recognize their sovereignty and take full advantage of their faculties.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cristian Saldana 9/24/14 Political Theory This essay considers the extent to which the U.S. should be tolerant of what can be considered damaging images, speech or actions. For example, I can choose to either live a life of good contribution to the country or no contribution in terms of productivity, development and research. Thus concludes my question if liberty, freedom and democracy improve whether or not somebody does or does not contribute.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every individual has an effect on society, just as society effects every individual. Mill’s preached that an individual was influenced by everything around it, from technological advancements to their geography. These influences can include behavioral changes, along with daily decision…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher, political economist, and liberal John Stuart Mill published one of his most famous works in 1859: On Liberty. Mill explores the innate and given liberties of people, analyzing what is the extent in which society or government has valid reasons to exercise power over its people. He argues that the individual should not be under the jurisdiction of society or government if their actions are not harming anyone but themselves. The only time society or government should involve themselves and exert power over citizens is if the actions of the individual are harming others within the society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart mill in his autobiography “A Crisis in My Mental History One Stage Onward” (1909-14),argues that you should not look for happiness but you should help others and on the way you will find your happiness. He supports his claim by first saying that if we focus on others mankind will be better and we all would be able to find happiness. Mill’s purpose is to show that if we all were nice to each other and helped each other the world would be better. He creates a serious tone for his American audience. What I thought of John Stuart mill’s autobiography.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is out of the power of Mill’s ethical claim to capture whether or not the consequences of certain actions are to be acknowledged as good or bad. Solely centralizing on the power of an action’s outcomes is merely not enough to classify the act as just or unjust. Rather, by recognizing the importance of an action’s principle, or reason to determine its true moral worth; and therefore neglecting the ethics behind John Stuart Mill. Work…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays