Mill Individual Liberty

Improved Essays
Mill's philosophy of individual liberty places limitations on the freedom that allows human beings to form opinions and express such views without restrictions or prejudice. He explicitly professes his belief in autonomy unless a person indicates a motive that places others in danger and asserts that people are well aware that actions shouldn't be as free as opinions1. Consequently, opinions lose protection, when the circumstances and the manner in which they are expressed in constitute an expression that supports some mischievous actions. Mill further disagrees with the Calvinistic theory which believes that humans only become real through compromise and anything that isn't our duty considered as a direct sin. His thought concludes that such a restricted view of humanity contradicts with the inner sound of man and the possibility that God created man with potential assuming that he would put such a high quality to perfect use. …show more content…
They use observation to see segments of activities, reasoning, and judgment to foresee the outcomes of such events gather materials for decision making and employ discrimination to decide which productive activity to undertake. After he or she decides which economic activity to partake, firmness and self-control assist him or her to hold on to the deliberate decision to completion2. This virtue is an essential element of economic efficiency that enables the achievement of goals and objectives such as improved quality and quantity of production, conformity to standards and distribution of commodities. Mill promotes a system where the society encourages individual liberty, driven by individuals and those satisfied with the existing situation to enable people to reach their maximum level of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    American politics, the word “liberty” is often tossed around by politicians to instill a sense of pride and trust in their supporters. However, it is rare to hear discussion as to what liberty means. In his essay, On Liberty, J.S. Mill attempts to concretely define what liberty is. He examines the concept of liberty and the consequences liberty has for a free society and attempts to define liberty as it relates to an individual’s interactions with a government and society. Mill also discusses the effects…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stuart Mills Nuisance

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    idea that an individual is so much of a problem that the government/society has to intervene is a troubling idea. However, john Stuart mills, would state that it is wrong for the government/society to intervene in an individual’s life. But, the issue of the nuisance is that he is a threat to himself and the people around him. According to john Stuart mills, “The liberty of the individual must be thus far limited; he must not make himself a nuisance to other people.” If john Stuart mills states that…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays