Compare And Contrast The Military Tactics Of Hans And Romans

The Roman Empire and the Hans Empire’s military and government systems were incredibly different in the sense of organization. The Roman Empire fought differently than the Hans and they approached war with more organized and well thought out tactics. The Hans military tactics went a different approach to warfare. The Hans’ military tactics were strategic through the deception. They defeated other empires by using their military tactics against them. The Romans planned their battles and how they were going to fight them whereas the Hans knew their opponents’ military tactics and barged in and took over. The Romans had more organized military tactics than the Hans due to the way they approached war. Over many centuries and across many territories the Romans were able to win an overwhelming number of victories with their military. All of their success were possible because of all the factors that played into it. The country of Italy wasn’t able to be attacked as easily as other places. The Roman’s had a large number of men who could fight in wars to pick from, they had an advanced army, and a centralized command. The Romans, once they conquered a territory, would include these people which allowed for strengthening and broadening of the Roman power. Rome was almost …show more content…
The romans think ahead and get to know what their enemies are about to do before it is done. They take hostages and try to communicate with those who are attacking them to exploit their weaknesses. The Han on the other hand adopted war tactics from their enemies and then used it against them. They never really put much thought or strategized their next move toward the enemy. There is a reason why the Romans were able to defeat so many enemies and it was because they took the time to plan ahead. In doing so when enemies would try to attack them they were prepared to take them