Moral Relativism In The Military

Great Essays
With the upcoming presidential election, the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) released guidance on communication with presidential campaign for all members of the United States Military and department of Defense (DoD). This guidance creates restrictions on what military members can and cannot do or say in regards to politics, which creates potential dilemmas in ethical decision making. Social media creates new issues not seen in most previous elections, as members can, and should, not post anything politically related in regards to politics. Although the right to speak freely is given in the First Amendment of the Constitution, Military members hold a distinct position of power, which can easily be abused to influence the general public, …show more content…
“Moral Relativism is the idea that the truth of a moral judgment or principle is dependent upon and relative to its acceptance by some person or a group of persons” (Rubel 25). According to this system, the beliefs of one member of the military may not, and likely does not, equate to the beliefs of all, or even a majority, of the military. The theory of relativism distinguishes the necessary difference between morals and regulations of military personnel compared to the civilian world, which further demonstrates the need to separate personal views from military views. In the civilian world, it is generally accepted to openly discus your political beliefs, and, in general, your profession holds little weight in your influence of others. Since the deviation of morals is accepted in the moral relativity theory, it can be commonly accepted that a military member will be on a level of higher morals. This obvious distinction can lead to the persuasion of society to conform to political beliefs campaigned by military …show more content…
The three tests, or questions to be asked, are: “Could it become Universal Law?” “Does it treat people as an end not merely as a means?” “could the maxim be willed by you and agreed upon by everyone as moral law for the community?” (Rubel 164-165). In the case of DoD personnel discussing political topics while affiliating with the DoD, it can be seen that two of the three categorical imperatives are not met. In some cases, the individual could be using people as a means rather than an end, by influencing them to push their own political agendas. Additionally, it is extremely unlikely that all members of society would be willing to agree that individuals in high power position should be able to discuss their own political views as a potential means of influence, making the maxim fail the third categorical imperative. Although this answer may be seen as ambiguous to some, all three of the imperatives must be accepted for the action to be considered morally acceptable, making this scenario

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Although it may be demanding, ethics and values that service members live by is a code of honor and is expected to be fulfilled. From the intensity and awe power of swearing in and during the entire basic training time; ethical codes and values are implanted into a service members mind and slowly become integrated into their own personal code of ethics. “Each company should adopt a written set of ethical rules which determine the standards of appropriate behavior. Such a code would help business ethics to become a major support of organizational culture, and thus the company would win and have a competitive advantage. ”(Rakichevikj, Strezoska, Najdeska, 2010)…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 2012 article for The New Yorker, “Atonement,” Dexter Filkins recounts his time spent in Iraq and explains how he helped connect Lu Lobello, a veteran suffering from severe PTSD, with the Kachadoorians, an Armenian family. While in Iraq, the Kachadoorians suffered devastating casualties and injuries at the hands of Lobello’s unit, Fox Company. Even though the United States Government determined the civilian deaths and injuries were justified, Lobello and many other members of Fox Company developed PTSD from the harm they caused. In this situation, most of the involved parties, including the U.S. government, held different conceptions of the right and wrong action to take. This difference in opinions is caused by the cloudy nature of morality…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the movie, A Few Good Men, there is controversy about obedience to authority when two marines follow an order believed to be unethical. Privates Dawson and Downey, carry out a “code red”, or hazing, of another member of the unit, and were put on trial for the unintentional murder of Private Santiago. Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist and author of “The Perils of Obedience” claims, “Some system of authority is a requirement of all communal living” (Milgram 78). Along with Milgram, Philip Zimbardo, and Erich Fromm also converse on the psychological issues regarding human behavior. Milgram’s test subjects were tricked into thinking they were electrically shocking someone if they answered a question wrong.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article claims that harmful emotions are embedded into soldiers when they are betrayed by authority; “the sense of betrayal when a buddy is hurt because of a poor decision made by those in charge” demonstrates how soldiers feel betrayed by their leaders and the irrational, death defying decisions that these leaders make (Wood). War campaigns romanticize war and entice individuals to enlist, but combat is actually a bloodbath. Soldiers are naive when entering war, but once they realize the propaganda that authority creates, soldiers become infuriated and subsequently lose their minds. The war poem “Here Dead We Lie” also shows how soldiers feel disdain for authority. In the second stanza, the narrator states that “[l]ife, to be sure, is nothing much to lose, but young men think it is, and we were young” (Housman 4-8).…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amongst themselves, they surreptitiously showcased their prowess at picking the young cadets to lie with them. At the least, this was a shameful act in the military where seniors are expected to lead by example; but worst of all, it is an act of abuse of power which is punishable by legal action yet impunity had reigned to this unfathomable extent. Furthermore, the acts threaten to dehumanize generations of military personnel. The author is concerned about the image of the military, but also more similarly about its functions. He argues that the fact that the conduct of a small group of officers can spread so viciously underlies the truth that confidence in the authorities could easily be lost.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dick Couch writes a thought-provoking book, A Tactical Ethic: Moral Conduct in the Insurgent Battlespace, which details a growing problem in the United States military, i.e. maintaining ethical and moral behavior on and off-duty. His supporting arguments are society emphasizes behavior not conducive to promoting positive ethical behavior, malignant personalities in the ranks spreading negative behavior, and the ambiguity of the asymmetric warfare fought today. He provides anecdotal evidence supporting the US military’s methodology to combat these trends. However, his true strength lies in the combat stories of ethical dilemmas related to him through soldiers serving in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and advice given for junior officers and…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Application of the Ethical Lenses Utilizing the three ethical lenses to apply the ethical reasoning, in regards to the rules, the Uniform Code of Military Justice is the foundation of military law in the United States. There are twelve subchapters in which subchapter ten refers to punitive articles. Under those punitive articles, Article 107 talks about false statements. A few Soldiers will not think about possible facing punitive actions when they make the conscious decision to cheat when completing training.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis Of A Few Good Men

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A backbone built on honor, code, and loyalty defines the “chain-of-command” mentality that associates with the military’s public persona. No clearer is this than in Rob Reiner’s A Few Good Men, bringing the judgement line of a military order and a gradually rationalized act of unethical action to the forefront. Commentary considered by Phillip Zimbardo’s “The Stanford Experiment” and Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And this is the code of the military and that all army personnel must abide by. When one has joined and has sworned in to be a member of the United States Army, he has given up the right to speak out his opinion for no matter what he thinks or believes in. He has voluntarily given up his first amendment right of the constitution, he has given up his right of freedom of speech, unlike the civilians who can speak their minds openly and freely. This is how the ranking works in the military, whatever your superior says, you are only expected to agree or say “Hooah”, regardless if you agree or disagree to whatever he is saying is irrelevant. Your opinion is irrelevant because you are supposed to follow orders and give respect to what your superior thinks is right.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America’s Dilemma: U.S. Army Senior Leader Misconduct One of the most respected professions among any ethical society has shown a significant weakness among its leadership at an alarming rate in recent history. More specifically, in the United States (U.S.) the Armed Forces are in an ethical dilemma. Among all of the U.S. Armed Forces, the U.S. Army has seen a staggering spike in senior leader misconduct in the twenty-first century, by the likes of which has never been recorded (Tan). In reaction to this, the U.S. Army has committed to ethical transparency involving misconduct among all of its members, including the most senior, most respected leaders. The Army has attempted to use transparency to combat this dilemma.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In life, we encounter many dilemmas and often have to determine what is right and wrong for the moral good of ourselves. One person’s morals may completely differ from another 's and this book displays it vividly. Men that dedicate their lives to serving their country sometimes find themselves in difficult debates quite like these. In the book, A Few Good Men, by Aaron Sorkin, Colonel Jessep was faced with the decision to either defend his nation or to let two of his own men take the fall for Santiago’s death. A similar ethical issue is when Corporal Downey and Corporal Dawson have to make the choice between being faithful marines or good people that are aware of right versus wrong.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    '(3) "Act according to the maxims if a universally legislative member of a merely potential kingdom of ends. " In other words, Kant argues that particular action requires conscious thought of the rule governing the action. Whether if everyone should follow that rule, and if the rule is acceptable for universal action, it should be adopted. If the rule is unacceptable, then it should be rejected. In order to understand whether or not an action follows Kant's "categorical imperative," we must prescribe those norms that we wish to be universal…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disadvantages Of Obedience

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The point being made is that extreme obedience is not always the answer if it can cause great harm to a society. That if an individual has a choice like the soldier in the example above, to follow others or proclaim their individuality; they can make the decision…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays