During my time as a writer in middle school I improved my ability in many areas. I never liked writing essays in english, the only part I really liked about was my friends in that class. I would want to talk to them the whole period instead of doing my work but I couldn’t. Some of my best strengths as a writer in middle school are coming up with stories and being able to describe searnios well. Also one of my strengths are being able to come up with a claim, getting evidence from the text and explaining that. There are areas I could use some growth like transitions of any kinds and proofreading especially. There are lots of different things I am good at and things I need to improve during middle school. For example one of my best strengths
…show more content…
Argumentative writing is my best kind of writing because I always get A’s on those kinds of essays and I am good at coming up with a claim, giving supporting evidence and explaining my evidence. I am very persuasive in my argument papers because I can come up with a strong claim and back with plenty of strong evidence while using quotes from other texts. For example, in my editorial paper I state my claim as the following, “Athletes get paid way more than they should and that money should be based on other things like the fans experience or people who risk their lives everyday. ” There, I provided my claim well and clearly. Narrative writing I am not as good at, for example I got a B on two of them and also I am not very good at building a plot and coming up with a story. I am not as good as I am at my argument essays then I am at my narrative writing,such as in my fictional narrative I write, “ He didn’t see any of scientists around so he slowly walked towards the the alien and released the alien from its shackles.” That quote shows I am not very good at writing stories. In analysis writing I am better at it than narrative writing but a little worse at than argument writing. I am decent at building an analysis in writing, such as in my analysis of stylistic techniques I state, “It describes the setting and gives an ominous, eerie,
Argumentative writing is my best kind of writing because I always get A’s on those kinds of essays and I am good at coming up with a claim, giving supporting evidence and explaining my evidence. I am very persuasive in my argument papers because I can come up with a strong claim and back with plenty of strong evidence while using quotes from other texts. For example, in my editorial paper I state my claim as the following, “Athletes get paid way more than they should and that money should be based on other things like the fans experience or people who risk their lives everyday. ” There, I provided my claim well and clearly. Narrative writing I am not as good at, for example I got a B on two of them and also I am not very good at building a plot and coming up with a story. I am not as good as I am at my argument essays then I am at my narrative writing,such as in my fictional narrative I write, “ He didn’t see any of scientists around so he slowly walked towards the the alien and released the alien from its shackles.” That quote shows I am not very good at writing stories. In analysis writing I am better at it than narrative writing but a little worse at than argument writing. I am decent at building an analysis in writing, such as in my analysis of stylistic techniques I state, “It describes the setting and gives an ominous, eerie,