Michelle Conover's Rights Violations

Decent Essays
Maryland court of appeals ruled Wednesday that a lesbian woman once married to another woman had no right to visitation or custody of a young boy her former partner gave birth to before the couple wed.

According to The Daily Record of Baltimore, the Court of Special Appeals upheld an earlier decision by the Washington County Circuit Court that ruled Michelle Conover does not have parental rights over Jaxon Conover.

The child was born six months prior to Michelle Conover’s marriage to his birth mother, Brittany Conover and 17 months before their divorce.

Judge Robert A. Zarnoch wrote in his opinion that current state law, governing the rights of same-sex couples is not clear and therefore distinguishes Michelle Conover as a “third party”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Levine v. Mcgrath 1. Against For She could stay with her sister It is what Sarah wanted She could see her school friends and grow up in the same neighbourhood she had before 2. Separating the sisters was not the main concern in this case as Sarah wanted to move herself, and they would still be able to see each other on alternating weekends if they wished to.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case being addressed in this essay is: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G. The topics being addressed in this essay will be provided through a summary and an analysis, explaining the case through legal liberalism and feminist legal theory in relation to the majority decision and the dissenting decision. I personally, agree with the reasoning of the majority decision and will prove why. Summary…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The father was arrested, but Joshua was left brain damaged. Joshua’s mother sued the county social services for not stepping up and protecting her child, even with evidence of abuse. The supreme court decided that Joshua’s rights were not violated by the state. The state cannot prevent someone from Due process, but it is not their responsibility to protect those rights, particularly from private violence.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The first responsibility of the court is to make orders that further the “best interests of the child.” [1] Being familiar with the homeless population through working in my school district the terms and context of “best interest” become confusing. We have families living near a running stream in a tent which is considered a running water supply. To many of you this may seem shocking, but when it fits others in the population a tent with a stream is considered satisfactory. Our school’s homeless coordinator works with these families to provide more stable conditions for them.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case United States v. Windsor, problems provoked regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The DOMA was a United States federal law that prohibited homosexual marriage while defining a marriage as a relationship between a male and a female. This act was soon ruled unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were happily married in Ontario, Canada (2007) until Thea Spyer died in 2009, leaving behind all their property for Edith. Similarly to what usually happens after a spouse dies, Windsor believed that she would be able to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses; however, since Windsor and Spyer had a homosexual marriage, Windsor was not considered Spyer’s…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine that you apply for a job. You have the requirements, even more than the necessary requirements, but you are turned away because you do not fit the looks that they have. Because of your religious wear, it causes a problem with “the look,” that the store is trying to achieve. This case ran through multiple courts and it eventually reached a decision. But since the procedure to come towards a conclusion took so long that there were multiple judgments throughout the full case.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carter Court Case Summary

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The mother contended that the probate judge should have dismissed the department’s petition because the department did not have legal custody of her daughter because G.L. c. 119, § 23A was unconstitutional, due to the fact that she was never afforded a hearing, when the department first took custody of her daughter. Id. The court went on to say that, “the fact that a mother is incarcerated, signals a higher likelihood of risk of danger to the welfare of a newborn infant”. 421 N.E. 2d 28, 33. There have been no other constitutional challenges to G.L. c. 119, § 23A. Like this case, our case is not about the unfitness of the appellant; our case is more focused on the long-term health, development, mobility, and education of the child.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following my thoughts, after reading Kristen v. Aisha; Brad v. Rasheed: What’s in a name and how it affects getting a job, I came to the conclusion that the system needs to string from discrimination. There essential is a need to being justice in our system and we have to learn to become equal amongst each other. Discrimination, prejudice, and stereotyping possess hate and mistreatment because of a simply name. Parents who name the child black-sounding names have the freedom to choose their kids names. Black name discrimination has an effect on the injustice system.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amendments are made to restrict political power and to ensure that the natural rights of citizens are protected. The first amendment, along with the Bill of Rights, was adopted on December 15, 1971 and since then 26 more amendments have been added to our Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment is one of the most known amendments and has been used in numerous court cases, such as Roe in 1973 when abortion became legal under the Fourteenth Amendment because the "Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action" includes "a right of personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy" and that "[t]his right of privacy . . . is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy”, but the courts have failed to produce a law that protects the rights of fathers in cases of abortions. One issue that many fathers face is that the mother of their child is not legally required to have their consent for an abortion.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Early colonists in North America were dumbfounded when they learned that many women in the colonies were doubling as a human, and a witch. During the early years of what is modern-day America, hundreds of women were accused of practicing witchcraft. Many men would accuse females who exhibited abnormal behavior, or family patterns during that time. Husbands, kids, or other family members of accused witches could also be convicted of practicing witchcraft by having any kind of association with the accused. There are many different beliefs about how certain residents of Salem got be chosen as witches.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Character of Action: Robert Harrison Keeler petition the Superior Court of Amador County for a review of the case on a “writ of prohibition’ (SCOCAL) Facts: On September 27, 1968, the petitioner and his wife of 16 years received an interlocutory decree of divorce. This decree granted the petitioner custody of their two daughters, ages 12 and 13 years and allowed visitations with Mrs. Keeler on alternative weekends. At the time of the decree Mrs. Keeler was pregnant with Ernest Vogt’s child, but concealed the fact from Mr. Keeler. On February 23, 1969, the petitioner was driving on a road in Amador County when he encounters Mrs. Keeler.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utah Judge May Have Violated Ethics Code in Blocking Same-Sex Adoption In November of 2015, Judge Scott Johansen ordered for an adopted child to be removed from a lesbian house hold. The couple were licensed foster parents, but lost custody of the child due to the fact that the child should be raised in an opposite- sex home. The attorney for the LGBTQ rights group, Curry Cook says, “this is the first time a judge has ordered a child to be removed from a home since Obergefell vs. Hodges legalized same-sex marriage across the country…the judge’s ruling goes against the state’s code of conduct for judges, which says that they musts perform duties without bias or prejudice.”…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commision was heard by the US Supreme Court December 5, 2017 and will be decided in 2018. The owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jack Phillips, is a christian man that designs cakes in the store. David Mullins and Charlie Craig are a same sex couple that went to Masterpiece Cakeshop with the intent of buying a wedding cake. David and Charlie asked to order a cake for their wedding, but Phillips told them that he would not make the wedding cake because it denied his religious beliefs. Phillips still offered to serve them, but he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If in a gay relationship where two men adopted a child then the legal parent gets to decide whether or not the second parent should have parental rights. In lesbian relationships this would be different, because one of the the women could have had a sperm cell placed in her to where now she is the biological mother. Also her and her spouse could have had the second parent 's eggs placed inside the first biological mother 's body, so that she is technically the biological mother also. This then would have to be resolved in the last option, which is a court appointed decision, but if the mothers just went through the steps of adoption; the legal parent will always have the decision to whether or not the second parent has any rights to the child. Just because people are fighting for gay adoption, doesn’t mean that every couple out there should adopt.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the past few years the acceptance of same sex marriage has been experiencing vast amounts of growth. Individuals nowadays are more accepting of same sex couples being given the right to marriage than they ever have been before. On June 26 of 2015 the Supreme Court declared that states’ banning of same sex marriage was unconstitutional. In the case Obergefell V. Hodges, the 14th Amendment was challenged by fourteen same sex couples. The couples claimed that the 14th Amendment required all states to accept legitimacy of marriages performed in other states and by not doing so, their rights were being infringed upon.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays