Michael Shaara's Killer Angels

Improved Essays
Have you ever given a speech that is to persuade somebody to do something? In the book Killer Angels by Michael Shaara and in the movie Gettysburg, Joshua Chamberlain had to and he got most of the men to do it. Josh Chamberlain was a colonel in the Union army in the Civil War.He was given 120 mutineers of a division in the Union army. Chamberlain got 114 of 120 men to join back into the army. After analyzing Joshua Chamberlain’s speech, the reader will find that the speech is very powerful. Joshua Chamberlain's speech showed many of his character traits by the way he talks to the men. One of his character traits is he is respectful. In the text it states, “I’m told to take you me with me if you don’t I can shoot you”(Shaara 8). Another one of his traits is responsible. The author states,“ I’ve been ordered to take you men with me” (Shaara 8).A final trait for Joshua Chamberlain is he is fair.An example from the text is, “I will do what I can to a fair trial”(Shaara 8). This shows Josh Chamberlain is fair by ensuring the men a …show more content…
One way the movie enhances Chamberlain’s speech is the viewer can hear his voice drop a few octaves because he is nervous and trying to think of something to say. In the book the reader can not hear this. Another way the movie enhances his speech is the viewer can see his expression change from confident to nervous. In the book the reader can not see this. In the film Chamberlain was standing up straight and being relaxed but when he started speaking to the men his face tensed up and he was stuttering. In the book the reader can not see this. A final way the movie enhances Chamberlain’s speech is the viewer can see his emotions change when he says certain words. In Gettysburg Chamberlain’s emotions change from happy to sad when he says die or freedom. This shows the movie is better because the viewer can see the change in emotion. The movie enhances the speech by giving a visual

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the overall tone and mood of both pieces show us how different their purposes are. The tone of the book is eerily matter-of-fact, not giving much emotion. Mrs. Maloney acts without much emotion, and the story seems to move exceptionally quickly. Whereas in the film, characters show much more emotion, dramatizing the whole story much more than the book does. The contrasting atmospheres in each piece show, again, how the book’s purpose is to tell the story, and the movie’s is to entertain…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Total war, a term that can be used to describe the most detrimental aspects of the Civil War. It bred mass destruction and unrestricted chaos that marked it as one of the worst American wars. However, although it contained deadly battles and disunity that engrossed the nation, it propagated individuals that would set a precedent for what it means to be an honorable leader. In the Civil War novel, The Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara, Union leader Colonel Joshua L. Chamberlain and Confederate leader, General Robert E. Lee, depict many corresponding ideals and strategic beliefs, that accompanied with their different motives for engaging in the war distinguished them as two of the most significant Civil War leaders. The novel provides a realistic…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book The Killer Angels by Micheal Shaara is about the battle of Gettysburg and attempts to convey the historical event by presenting it in a fashion that feels fictional, but is based on documents and letters that were set around that time. The book covers the event through the eyes of different confederate and union officers, and is told in such a way that you feel sympathetic to the characters because you can see their panic, and the decision making process that each officer uses. This book is separated into four sections these are; the day before, the two days of, and the day after. Each section has chapters that are written from the view of seven different characters, each character has a different importance. These characters are: The Spy, Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, John Buford, James Longstreet, Robert E. Lee, Freemantle, and Lewis Armistead.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He maintained the integrity and elements of the story that inflicted suspense and impacted the reader and translated them through film. The major difference between the film and the story is the length of time it takes to tell it and the order of events. The story gives you exactly what you need to know, every detail is important to the comprehension of the story. The film adds a bit of filler information, elaborating on events. The actors who portray the characters are appropriately selected and enhance the visual side of the account.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Raya Mirkheshti, 8C History- Grant “John A - Birth of a Country” Given the fact that the audience will take away from the movie an impression of the historical events or figures portrayed in the story,does the film improve the viewer’s understanding of historical events? Justify your conclusion. (1 to 3 paragraphs)…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the last few months, I have read and annotated Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the Art of Persuasion by Jay Heinrichs. After being a journalist and publishing executive for 25 years, Heinrichs is now the professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Middlebury College in Vermont and travels the world as a presenter and persuasion expert. Published in 12 languages and 3 editions, Thank You For Arguing is a New York Times bestseller, along with being one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard. My analysis of Thank You For Arguing made me uncover the lost art of rhetoric, the steps in creating an excellent persuasive speech, and identifying the three methods of persuasion in everyday arguments.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year is 1940, and as of the 5th of June Adolf Hitler’s German forces had invaded, conquered, and now occupied France. At the mercy of the Germans, France was on their knees and all chances of taking their country back were doubtful. On June 18th, French General Charles de Gaulle’s voice broadcasted on the radios nationwide as he delivered the “Appeal of June 18”, a call for France to not secede in the fight against Nazi Germany. I believe Charles de Gaulle’s ability to present an effective persuasive piece in his compelling speech is exceptional. He is able to appeal to his audience by using ethos, pathos, and logos which allows his rhetoric to be effectively persuasive as well as motivating.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Nixon’s Checkers Speech On September 23, 1952 Richard Nixon, a candidate for vice president, gave his famous “Checkers speech” to persuade the American people and potential voters that he was an innocent family man who would never take bribes. The American populace thought he had received over 18,000 dollars worth of bribes, and for him to save his and Eisenhower’s chances of winning the election he gave a speech with an innocent family man appeal that then shifted to an accusatory voice due to his anger toward the “witch hunts”.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dialogue in 1930s and 1940s’ Hollywood Films According to Bhullar’s experiment of testing intensity of emotions with AV(auditory-visual), VO(visual-only) and AO(auditory-only), audience perceived greater intensity of tested emotions, which were happiness and sadness, in AV speeches than those of VO and AO alone (Bhullar 193). Clearly, scientific evidence reinforces the cause of the storm of talkies. That is, dialogue conveys and augments the moods within the film, which directly influences audience’s perceptions. James O. Spearing once wrote in Now the Movies Go Back to Their School Days , “...when screen actors began to speak lines, the silent drama was attacked. Voices invaded its peculiar domain” (Spadoni 4).…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Spring Final There are several occurrences that prove the theory that words are more powerful than weapons. In the play Julius Caesar a guy by the name of Marc Antony convinces a whole crowd of people to revolt against their leader. In Germany Hitler did a similar thing, he turned the people to his radical side. They used persuasive speech and gave the people offers that caused them to be loyal to them.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Power Of Speech “He told me to do it!” Speech is a very influential factor when persuading someone. Gorgias, a famous sophist thought that all language incorporated a persuasive aspect. Gorgias believed that the truth can be created by rhetoric. According to Gorgias speech is extremely powerful and it can be the cause of destruction.…

    • 2020 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion is a powerful tool that can either be used for good or bad. Having the ability to persuade any one and everyone is a talent to be afraid of. In Julius Caesar the plot revolves around a conspiracy to assassinate Caesar. One by one people are convinced to join the conspiracy by Cassius the leader of the group. Cassius is the leader of the conspiracy group against Julius Caesar.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Convincing others to change their mind is tricky. As business people, getting others to agree to our ideas will be a crucial part of our jobs. We need to understand the best strategies to persuade others. In order to understand persuasion, we need to know the objectives of persuasion, what type of arguments to use, and how to successfully persuade.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power of Speech “He showed it was possible to make a weak argument stronger through careful construction, and taught his art to willing pupils.” This quote from Strategy, by Lawrence Freedman, means that the strength of an argument depends on the ability one can speak. An argument between either an individual or a group can easily be defeated by one’s ability to speak. Persuasion is easily achievable with a powerful speech using both listening and speaking, but the most vital is speaking skills. Speech allows for an individual to lead a conversation, portray a picture, and convince the listener.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays