In another case determining whether a minor was sophisticated and mature enough to stand trial as an adult who had a mental illness, Meza v. State, 543 S.W. 2d 189 (1976), Meza, a minor and committed aggravated robbery at a convenience store and shot the manager. The juvenile court waived its exclusive original jurisdiction, and Meza’s case was transferred to the district court. Meza appealed the decision. One of Meza’s points of error was of the sufficient of the evidence concerning his maturity and sophistication to be treated as an adult. According Family Code Section 54.02(d), the court obtained a diagnostic study, social evaluation, and full investigation of Meza, his circumstances, and the circumstances of the alleged offense.
