Mexican American War Sectionalism

Improved Essays
Slavery was a major issue in the United States. The Northern and the Southern states had different point of views on just about anything. The north wanted nothing to do with slavery, but the south was just the opposite. This clashes between the north and the south caused sectionalism of the United States. Sectionalism is a slow tearing of the nation. Many issues such as slavery, industrialization, tariffs, and culture sharply divided the country. The demand for slavery in the south kept increasing, as there was a rise in the tobacco industry requiring more laborers. There were different categories of slaves: City slaves, which were primarily skilled workers; Domestic Slaves, who worked in the house; this was mostly women; Field slaves, which …show more content…
When Texas was annexed into the United States, Mexicans had cut all relations with the United States. President James Polk ¬¬¬¬¬¬ordered James Taylor to occupy the space between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande. When Mexicans learned of this they crossed over to the Rio Grande and attacked Americans troops. Hearing this news, the United States Congress immediately approved a declaration of War against the Mexicans. As president Polk was growing impatient with how slow the war was progressing, he sent Nicholas Trist to negotiate a settlement. “On February 2, 1848, he reached agreement with the new Mexican government on the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, by which Mexico agreed to cede California and New Mexico to the United States and acknowledge the Rio Grande as the boundary of Texas” (p.297). The Mexican-American War had regenerated the slavery-extension issue that had been put to rest during the Missouri …show more content…
A slave named Dred Scott and his spouse Harriet initially filed the Dred Scott Case in 1846; they filed a suit for their freedom. His master who was an officer in the U.S. Army took Dred Scott from Missouri to Illinois. After his master received orders to return to Missouri, he took Dred Scott with him and soon passed away. So after that with help from an abolitionist, he filed a case in federal court that he should be a free man because he had resided in a free state for a long period of time. Supreme Court’s Chief Justice at the time was Roger Taney, who was a slave owner himself. Eleven years later in March of 1857, the Supreme Court made a decision that Dred Scott will not be given his freedom because slaves are not considered American citizens. Not being a citizen and having basically no rights his case was denied. This ruling affected millions of slaves in

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the Americans had tried to see if the Mexicans had crossed the river, they found that the Mexicans were preparing to cross. Some Americans were killed and Polk got upset. Polk convinced congress that there were enough reasons to go to war with Mexico, in order to defend Texas. The House of Representatives and Senate voted on going to war. The senate had 40 yeses and 2 nos (Doc. B, Note).…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision In 1846, after about 46 years of being a slave, I awoke feeling confident and brave. Today I would do something I been thinking about doing this forever. Today I went to the Missouri State Court and I asked the court to be free,claiming that I have lived in a free state and territory. But, the court claimed I was still a slave.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polk called for annexation of both Texas and Oregon (by the Oregon Treaty) and won the presidency of 1844. Just as promise, Teas and Oregon was added to the United States. Mexico was not satisfied with the decision because it never formally recognized Texan independence. In the treaty that Santa Anna signed it states the southern boundary of Texas at the Rio Grande, but the Mexican government claimed the boundary at the Nueces River.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was a bold move by Scott since he was an african-american slave at that time to go against a federal court ruled by whites. However, he had the courage and passion to fight for the rights that he thought he was entitled to. Roger B. Tawney, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, disagreed strongly with Scott’s points and request. Tawney was strongly opposed to an abolitionist movement and believed that slavery was ethically and morally right. The final verdict in the case was that no slaves, even those who were free, would ever be granted citizenship and treated one hundred percent as an official United States…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Northern and Southern parts of the United States settled along different ways. The South remained mostly agricultural economy while the North developed more and more industrialized. Different social cultures and political views established. All of this led to problems such as taxes, tariffs and states rights against federal rights. The main problem that led to the collapse of the union was the discussion over the future of slavery.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland. The United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. Court’s majority decided that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, believed that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic,…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Slavery and sectionalism were two causes of the Civil War. The South allowed slavery but the northern states were against slavery. In 1860, in the South there were approximately 4,000,000 slaves. In the North, slaves were not allowed. Southerners relied on slaves to work on their plantations.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The states of the North had become anti-slavery and the states of the South became slavery supporters. This is a relation to sectionalism in the 1800s because as time went by, the North and the South began to encounter issues, such as losing supporters with the same views of slavery. As the issues became more violent, the separation of the two Cardinal…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism and sectional feelings caused America to divide and turn against itself which induced the Civil War. When examining the causes of the civil war, historians find that the main cause of sectionalism was slavery and the beliefs surrounding it. As best put, “slavery increasingly became the the main factor behind political, economic, and social sectionalism in the US.” Slavery was the main factor in sectionalism, and therefore the Civil War, yet the slavery induced sectionalism was not repaired during the Civil War and reconstruction period. Historians can ultimately see that while ending slavery was the main cause of sectionalism, race based sectionalism did not end with the Civil War.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Before April 25, 1846, American you know today wasn't the same If America didn’t go to war with Mexico, American would only be half of the size it was today. This all started because Texas declared its independence from Mexico. Mexico wasn’t so thrilled about Texas actions. Which, leads to the question, was America justified to war with Mexico?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays