John Stuart Mill's Categorical Imperative

Improved Essays
The Categorical Imperative is the fundamental idea illustrated in the deontological moral philosophy of German philosopher, Immanuel Kant. Kant, often viewed as one of the most important figures in modern philosophy, attempted to discover how humans can be good and moral outside the traditional, religious framework. It was Kant’s desire to replace religious authority with the authority of reason and human intelligence. The idea for which he is most famous, the Categorical Imperative, is developed in his relatively brief text on moral philosophy, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. This idea solidifies the autonomy of the will as the foundation of morality. The Categorical Imperative is divided into several formulations which are all …show more content…
In short, the utilitarian theory argues that the moral action is the one that brings about the best state of affairs. The best state of affairs is the state of affairs that consists of the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill’s utilitarian theory is heavily influenced by Jeremy Bentham’s ideas on the same topic. However, Mill’s writings on utilitarianism attempt to understand what he calls “higher” pleasures and work to resolve complex problems that Bentham’s theory …show more content…
Utilitarianism is the most developed and most popular consequentialist theory. Mill’s Utilitarianism says that an action is right if it maximizes happiness and minimizes pain. What sets Mill’s Utilitarianism apart from the Utilitarian theories that preceded it is the idea that pleasures are not all of the same value. According to Mill, any human who has experienced both higher and lower pleasures would prefer the higher. This could be because an essential component of human happiness is dignity and higher pleasures further that sense of dignity. Mill’s Utilitarian theory takes the basic ideas of Bentham’s work and attempts to answer questions left by his predecessor to lead to a more complex form of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He suggests these people are more qualified to judge a pleasure’s overall quality rather than someone who has only experienced the low pleasures in life. Mill declares these people, who are more familiar with those higher pleasures, then undoubtedly have an increased value for high intellect, feelings, imagination, and moral sentiments that are included with the higher pleasures. Mill states, the remarkably lower pleasures only take into account the pure physicality of the pleasure taken part in, unlike higher pleasures. Therefore, higher pleasures are far more superior in quality and naturally more desirable to…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Still, it does explain the dignity and value we as mortals attach to higher pleasures that are achieved by higher capacity exercises. Perhaps it is the sensitivity we have to a higher purpose of life that makes higher order actions more pleasurable in the quality of pleasure they create and the long-lasting nature of this said pleasure. A question that arises here, is that how can this ideology be hedonism when it goes against a basic assumption. In hedonism, there is acceptance of the idea that the only way a pleasure is better than another pleasure is by it being more pleasurable. Whereas Mill has added the idea of higher and lower faculties to this.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This choice will be linked with quality pleasure if the subject would not chose the other pleasure given the fact that more of that option may be given. Society tends to gravitate towards pleasures that acquire a higher aptitude. Those that seek this usually do not get the full bliss from what life has to offer only because being too informed about anything, and/or everything can decrease the spontaneous aspect of what the world has to offer. This is where we coin the phrase, “Ignorance is bliss.” I completely agree with the distinctions made by Mill between the quantity of pleasures and quality of pleasures. In addition I also agree that the quality of pleasures surpasses the quantity aspect.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”. According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill).…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that the “consequences of our actions are more important than our intentions” (Boss, 2014, p. 234). In other words, an action is right or wrong depending on the outcome of that action. It is concerned with the greatest happiness for the greatest number. According to utilitarians, the desire to achieve happiness is self-evident and universal. They believe that pleasure makes people happy.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to explain what happiness is according to John Stuart Mill in his book Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a component of a bigger theory known as consequentialism, which Mill views though the hedonistic perspective. In this theory, Mill has an understanding of a “ultimate standard of morality," which he believes to have two components: a theory of right action and a theory of value. A theory of right action is the idea that we must cause the best possible consequences; where a theory of value explains which consequences of our actions count as valuable. John Mill believes that the only thing that is intrinsically valuable is pleasure and the absence of pain.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act Utilitarianism is that moral theory discussed previously in which a single decision is considered morally right on the grounds that a morally right decision will promote the most universal happiness. Rule Utilitarianism judges the morality of a set of rules, then holding that a decision that is derived from that predetermined set of rules that promotes the most overall happiness as any other alternative is the morally right decision. Because this set of rules that increases happiness most is adopted beforehand according to Rule Utilitarianism, the implication of the impossibility of accurately judging every possible decision and its corresponding effect on happiness is…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Act utilitarianisms claim that when we are determining what to do, we should achieve the act that will establish the greatest net worth. In their perspective, the principle of unity is to do whatever will create the best overall outcome. The theory ought to be handled in certain acts to specific situations. The appropriate action in any circumstance is the one that produces more benefits and well being, than any other circumstance. A term used by act utilitarianisms is optimific, which means “to yield the greatest balance of benefits over the drawbacks.” (Shafer-Landau.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Kant being filled with happiness and having the characteristic on being good are two different things. “Happiness can even be reduced to less than nothing”, but an achievement happiness is always conditioned. “Kant claims that a good will is an ultimate, unconditional good. Unconditional good is a good no matter how it was a achieved in a right way or wrong way, when to a ultimate good, is basically pleasure; is good regardless however the good was achieved. Kant believes that the action of duty has moral worth and if we were to avoid the doubt and have the lack of belief of our ethics, it must be rational based, unconditional.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays