In today’s media there are things that are considered morally correct which is shown in a person’s behavior or activity. This is known as ethics which is defined by the oxford school dictionary as a standard of right behaviour or moral principles. There are three levels of ethics: metaethics, normative and applied ethics. Metaethics is a more basic understanding of moral reasoning. Normative ethics can be seen as more following the rules and regulations of the expected moral decisions. Applied ethics accepts both general guidelines and big rules which involves balancing these conflicting interests.
There was an article made on November 11th, 2016 in the Tribune online newspaper by a reporter named Lamech Johnson. This article is entitled …show more content…
Chrissy’s first well known incident would seem more like a propaganda but this incident also has to do with ethics. In 2012, Chrissy shared her political fond of the Free National Movement before and after the general election. This occurred Chrissy had her talk show on Zns called “Immediate Response.” Soon after the election, I am sure Chrissy was worried and was trying to prepare herself of what was going to happen to her employment status because the Free National Movement had lost the election. Soon after her contract was terminated because they believed that she did not carry herself in a professional manner, where it should not be bashing of one party because in this sense she would be persuading others on what party they should vote for on election day because of her freedom of speech. Talk show host Christina Thompson found another radio station talk show soon after her termination with ZNS. She went to work with the Guardian radio and was the host of “Reality Check” talk show. Ms. Thompson had a guest star by the name of Mr. Ferguson that supposedly the Guardian’s managers did not want his appearance on the show due to particular reasons. Since Ms. Thompson was such an outspoken person she took it upon herself to boldly have Mr. Ferguson on the show whiles being aired in Washington D.C. She also threatened on air to “pull files” and make a sexual harassment lawsuit. In the first incident it would have been metaethics that would teach Christina that voicing her political position on air can cause serious consequences. However, in the second incident it would have been applied ethics that would teach Christina to listen to her managers because they would have good reasons why they chose not to allow Mr. Ferguson on the
There was an article made on November 11th, 2016 in the Tribune online newspaper by a reporter named Lamech Johnson. This article is entitled …show more content…
Chrissy’s first well known incident would seem more like a propaganda but this incident also has to do with ethics. In 2012, Chrissy shared her political fond of the Free National Movement before and after the general election. This occurred Chrissy had her talk show on Zns called “Immediate Response.” Soon after the election, I am sure Chrissy was worried and was trying to prepare herself of what was going to happen to her employment status because the Free National Movement had lost the election. Soon after her contract was terminated because they believed that she did not carry herself in a professional manner, where it should not be bashing of one party because in this sense she would be persuading others on what party they should vote for on election day because of her freedom of speech. Talk show host Christina Thompson found another radio station talk show soon after her termination with ZNS. She went to work with the Guardian radio and was the host of “Reality Check” talk show. Ms. Thompson had a guest star by the name of Mr. Ferguson that supposedly the Guardian’s managers did not want his appearance on the show due to particular reasons. Since Ms. Thompson was such an outspoken person she took it upon herself to boldly have Mr. Ferguson on the show whiles being aired in Washington D.C. She also threatened on air to “pull files” and make a sexual harassment lawsuit. In the first incident it would have been metaethics that would teach Christina that voicing her political position on air can cause serious consequences. However, in the second incident it would have been applied ethics that would teach Christina to listen to her managers because they would have good reasons why they chose not to allow Mr. Ferguson on the