Just Rule Vs Kantianism

Improved Essays
The social contract theory, as an ethical theory, requests all individuals live in society to implicitly reach an agreement to abide by moral rules established to govern relations among citizens while a government is capable of enforcing these rules. What’s more, these rules ought to be collectively agreed to accept by rational people for their mutual benefit. On the condition that others are supposed to follow these rules as well. Besides these rules, John Rawls’s Principles of Justice is also needed to take account of. On the basis of Rawls’s opinions, for a just rule, it has to be the rights and liberties that every individual may claim and is consistent. Furthermore, as a just rule, it is supposed to guarantee the equality of both social …show more content…
In Kantianism it looks at the idea of good will. This means that even if an action may cause harm it could still be considered good based on the good will behind it. For rules to be accepted by Kantianism it must pass two categorical imperatives. The first is "Act only from moral rules that you can at the same time will to be universal moral laws". The second imperative is "Act so that you always treat both yourself and other people as ends in themselves, and never only as a means to an end". By using both of these one can analyze the rule that Mercedes does not have to provide adequate customer service to Chinese customers.

Mercedes rule passes the first categorical imperative as it could be used universally because the rule is so specific. Changing the rule from this situation to a universal rule does not really change anything at all. It also does not contradict itself so it is viable to pass.

The rule would also pass the second categorical imperative. This is because Mercedes is not using the Chinese customer as a means to an end it is just the way that they run their business. They are not using anyone as a means to an end. One argument is that they would do this to save money and that is using the Chinese customer as a means to an end but the fact is that if they would lose money in the long run by not providing this service so they would not be using them for any type of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argues that some people are just born to be slaves, it’s in their nature to be obedient. “Some people,” he said, “were born natural slaves. They differ from ordinary people in the same way that the body differs from the soul. Such people are by nature slaves, and it is better for them…to be ruled by a master. Just as are some are by nature free, so others are by nature slaves, and for these latter the condition of slavery is both essential and just”…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Rodriguez clearly communicates this in his argument that immigrants have to reinvent their ethnic background to be in line with America. In the text, “Blaxicans”, Rodriguez explains how he had to call myself “Hispanic” (line72). This term did not sit well with him because it placed him in a bag with many other Spanish ethnic backgrounds that were from Latin America. For example, Rodriguez stated that during President Nixon’s administration, he had houses that all races to sit in the cafeteria (line 73). If you were black or Hispanic, you had to sit and eat with your race.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Williams, in his paper, Incentives, Inequality and Publicity, takes to task Cohen’s analysis of Rawls’ remarks concerning what the basic structure of society consists in. Drawing on a close examination of Rawls’ comments on the subject, Williams’ posits a characterisation that pushes to the fore the idea of publicity. The upshot of William’s analysis is that Cohen’s attempt to broaden the definition of the basic structure to capture individual choices, and in so doing identify society possessing an egalitarian ethos as a demand of justice, fails because it is not consistent with Rawls’ publicity requirements. The difference principle, Williams maintains, “is inherently restricted” and “applies only to a society's fundamental social,…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first part of the categorical imperative requires, a rationale, stable place to live and in which the lawmaker would…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypothetical imperative is applicable to those with the desire, end or goal they want to achieve. And so, if I don’t desire to get an A on the exam or maybe I am satisfied with a C grade, the hypothetical imperative if you want an A on the exam, you ought to study does not apply to me. On the other hand, a categorical imperative is a rule or moral directive from reason that is binding without condition; a command that applies to all rational beings, no matter what. Actions done in accordance with these rules are morally good or morally…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls and Nozick: Justice as a Fair Inequality or Entitled Right? Distributive justice is the economic framework within a society which determines the distribution of goods amongst its members. How goods should be distributed and to whom have been interpreted by John Rawls and Robert Nozick, two contemporary philosophers that share the belief that there is no practical form of equal distribution of goods within society, but disagree on what constitutes a true distributive justice when taking that into consideration. The philosophers’ interpretations of distributive justice are influenced by their respective beliefs – Rawls’ principles of justice are egalitarian in nature, while Nozick’s entitlement theory is strong in its libertarian sentiments.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using the first principle of justice, the laws that are based off the “general will” will always promote the security and freedom of individuals intact. Due to the emphasis on promoting freedom and equality, the ideal society would fall under Rawls’ determination of fairness under the first principle of justice. Rawls puts an emphasis on equal liberties and Rousseau’s society is focused on equality of all individuals. In that society, individuals have social liberties similar to those Rawls emphasizes. “The social compact creates an equality among the citizens so that they all commit to the same conditions and should all have the same rights.”…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Earth is currently facing detrimental environmental issues. These issues have been evident for decades; however, many people have continuously denied them to be problematic or even their existence entirely. While these critics have managed to get away with the rejection of these problems for many years, it is no longer deniable that the issue of environmental degradation is very real and in need of immediate action. Much of the population has come to understand this, and have executed a variety of modest attempts to increase environmental sustainability. However, these efforts have demonstrated to be of minimal effect in solving the large-scale issues directly causing the degradation.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent events, James Liang, an employee of 30 years for Volkswagen, came forward admitting to using software to deceive emissions tests in the United States for Volkswagen’s diesel engines. The engines, on average, produce 40 times the legal limits on emissions. After undergoing investigation, it was found that Volkswagen had been involved in this scandal since 2006. In response to public outcry the company has recalled all models using this engine and set aside 16 billion dollars to fix their mistake. However, for Liang after admitting his guilt, he intends to help bring others responsible for the scandal to light.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    the stance of the company and Luke’s coworkers. The reason behind my recommendation is that by using the categorical imperative from the view of the company and its stakeholders Luke can ensure that the inevitable damage that would have otherwise occurred would not actually occur. At the present time there is no proof that Owen would actually suffer a loss if Luke doesn’t tell Owen about the future decline in property values. Thus, from the information that is currently known, it is best to go with the categorical imperative from the company’s point of view.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to judge a situation using Social Contract theory, we have to understand a few principles behind the theory first. These include the Social Contract, John Rawl 's Principle of Justice, and the Difference Principle. Using these three ideas, we can determine what constitutes a community of people, what makes a moral rule correct, and which correct moral rules would be accepted by a community of people. The Social Contract is this idea that when people come together to form a community, moral rules must be agreed upon that benefit everyone in the community. Not only that, but the Social Contract needs some kind of established governing body to enforce the agreed upon rules.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays