Mercantilism During The Age Of Exploration

Improved Essays
Mercantilism was the prevailing economic philosophy during the Age of Exploration. Spain, France, England, and the Germany all practiced mercantilism during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The big idea of mercantilism was for a country to increase their trade deficit, and therefore overall wealth, by exporting more goods than they import. The time of exploration was all about countries conquering new lands to show their strength and power. The colonies of a country were the backbone of this self-sufficient economy. The idea of mercantilism was a driving force behind the desire to conquer new lands. New lands would provide a country with a wider variety of natural resources, therefore making it easier for a country produce all the …show more content…
They would grant subsidies as a cash payment in order to encourage someone to make a certain product. They would also give certain companies an exclusive right to promote a product, creating a monopoly on it. This would take away all the competition for that product within the country. The government also imposed protective tariffs, or a tax on imports. This allowed for English companies to raise their prices on things and still have their prices be lower than the competition from other countries, since the tax added so much onto the price. All of these incentives decreased risk and competition within the economy of a country. Mercantilism is not about individualism, but the whole country working as a team to produce what is needed in order for the country to be self-sufficient.
The insurance of sea power was also very important to be self-sufficient. Shipping was a very important industry. Shipyards were important so that a country could build it’s own ships to export their goods. Sea power was essential to control foreign markets. A great merchant fleet would remove the need for borrowing the ships of another country. This is just one more aspect that is important for a country to be
…show more content…
A capital market is a market in which the consumers have a very limited number of suppliers. The colonies are expected to trade exclusively with the mother country. This allows for the mother country to be able to raise prices, since there is no competition.
The English created a trade system where Americans provided raw goods to Britain and Britain used those goods to produce manufactured goods that were sold in European markets, and then back to the colonies. As suppliers of the raw goods, American could not compete with the British in manufacturing. English ships and merchants were always favored, excluding other countries from being able to share in the British Empire’s wealth. The English Parliament passed the Navigation Acts that severely limited the colonies’ trade options. The Navigation Acts permitted only British ships to carry American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With England closing an eye to trading, many colonists were able to smuggle foreign goods in. It was much cheaper than going the proper way through English imports and illegal. Until the French and Indian War, economically things flourish by being self sufficient. This war changes the attitude that America and England had with each other. During the salutary neglect, colonists did as they pleased without bothering Britain.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goals Of Mercantilism

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Britain also benefited from the mercantilism system because they had the power to submit the colonies into providing everything they needed to run a successful economy. They restricted the colonist right to free trade in order to make a bigger profit. Essentially the colonies were a cheap unlimited source of raw goods that Britain could exploit. England had a monopoly over the colonies and used the profits gained to increase military power. With increased military power, England was able to deter smugglers and also eliminate international competition while trading with the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Consumers Need Trade

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Free Trade agreements are good for a competitive market and create economic flow. Trade agreements are also impacted by taxes put on goods and services. Consumers all know the word tax. It just means more money from the pocket to the government. The tariffs in the United States economy is much lower with the free market, so this creates a bit of conflict with the trade tariffs.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A tariff like the one spoken of will only help domestic producers as they will now be willing to increase production as the tariff makes it profitable even if the world price does not. The government also wins as they now can gain money they previously weren’t able to. On the other hand, consumers lose out as they must now pay more money. Meaning tariffs aren’t a good thing and instead affect the economic well-being of the country. His reasoning for a tariff in order to stop unemployment is also flawed because unemployment does not rise when imports…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However a monopoly must lower price to increase output and sell it. Output will increase and be a lot more substantial than in a monopolistic competitive market. If a substantial amount of money is invested in inventory and it is not moving for some reason, the monopoly would lower prices as well. Fear of competition in a monopoly also works in the consumer’s favor by providing the consumer with improved products and better pricing. In a monopolistic competitive market, industries will produce as much as they can sell.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Companies in the United States want cheap labor to increase their profit margins with the possibility of investing it into domestic and foreign infrastructure. The workers then have a job in which they make considerably more than in their local economy. The disparity lies in the safety conditions of these workers. An argument for these workers is that businesses have an ethical duty to impose certain safety procedures. While any moral person can agree, the variation lies in how far do these safety procedures need to go.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the authors also use the evidence about supply and demand — specifically how increase supply of workers drive down wages (9). The last piece of evidence used to support the reason is that undocumented immigrants do the same work but employers do not have to give them benefits (10). This evidence was used because all of those reasons mean employers spend less money on their employees and can sell their products for cheaper which impacts the economy. The second reason Lakoff and Ferguson use to support their subclaim is that the undocumented immigrants are mostly economic refugees (9). The authors use the definition of refugees as the first piece of evidence to connect undocumented immigrants to refugee status (9).…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benefits Of Outsourcing

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The problem with outsourcing is that when a company does outsource to save money, they drive the price of labor down in their home countries as a response to the outsourced labor that is cheaper as well as driving the product price. When the product price goes down typically the product demand goes up. This does not necessarily work. Lets use a hypothetical country that every citizen makes a widget, that is the countries sole product. The neighboring country has a lower minimum wage and there is no extra cost to import that widget into the home country.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for mercantilism to work properly for large profits in the government, there needed to be more exports than imports; in order for that to happen, the English passed laws and acts in their American colonies in order to favor themselves. Between 1651 and 1673, the Navigation Acts were passed: they stated that only English/English colonial ships could carry cargo, certain goods could only “be shipped through England”, money would be paid to Americans who produced raw goods that England wanted, and Americans were not to be in competition with the English economy. Colonial trade was restricted by these acts; therefore, mercantilism had a negative relationship with the American colonies. However, at the beginning, many colonists were able to escape the acts through smuggling and salutary neglect (a policy developed by England that meant that “trade laws that most hurt the colonial economy were not enforced”. They did this to maintain the colonists’ colony because England needed the colonists’ support at the time of the Seven Years’ War.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is open to Imperialists to argue thus: "We must have markets for our growing manufactures, we must have new outlets for the investment of our surplus capital and for the energies of the adventurous surplus of our population: such expansion is a necessity of life to a nation with our great and growing powers of production.” This excerpt, conveys economics as the primary motivation for the European Imperialism of the late 19th century. This is seen as the government recognizes the necessity to expand the economy in order to produce more jobs for the growing population of the nation. In addition, the government also understood the importance of improving the economy in order to sustain the levels of mass production due to the effects of the industrial…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays