Mental Illness Vs. Mental Insanity

Decent Essays
People often have a misconception when it comes towards the terms mental illness and mental insanity - which in fact both terms are entirely disparate. To be mentally insane, means to have no recognition between reality and fantasy but unlike suffering from mental insanity, to suffer from mental illness means the person does have recognition of their surroundings however, they have affected mood behaviors, (Brewbaker). Therefore,when person suffers from a mental health problem and is charged with criminal charges, “they can get hospitalized for up to 60 days for treatment, during which time they will be examined to see if they are competent to stand trial”, (Brewbaker). Thus, once a person can withstand trial the judge can then make a verdict

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In "Where Hell Is Other Patients," Stephen Seager explains everything wrong with today's hospitals for the criminally insane. Seager emphasis the fact that modern laws and regulations fail to protect the staff of these hospitals, allowing some violent patients to continually assault their caretakers. He also points out that assaults on les violent patients is also a problem. Seager claims that these problems come not only form poor governmental regulations, but also from oversights by the hospitals themselves. Seager also goes on to call out some of the organizations that are supposed to help out the patients and staff of these hospitals, saying that they are ineffective.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Court will have to allow this defense because in Arizona 's limited insanity defense in Clark v. Arizona, and denied certiorari in Delling v. Idaho, a case alleging that Idaho 's replacement of the insanity defense with a "Guilty but mentally ill" verdict constitutes a due process violation. Because of the weighty implications of the decision to plead insanity, the defendant must be the one to decide whether to use the insanity…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Competency to stand trial is different from insanity defense when it comes down to the…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “You must plead insanity. You must give the jury a way out. You must show them a way to find him not guilty if they are so inclined. If they’re sympathetic, if they want to acquit, you must provide them with a defense they can use to do it. It makes no difference if they believe the insanity crap.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One look at this case study and one will immediately wonder, would Lisa Miller be competent to stand trial and if so would she be able to enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity? First, a solid understanding must be reached as to what it means to be competent to stand trial. A look at how Costanzo and Krauss (2015) define competency to stand trial and how it pertains to the Miller case. Then an examination of an article in which competency to stand trial is the main focus. Next, what factors are involved when determining if a defendant can be found not guilty by reason of insanity as per Costanzo and Krauss (2015).…

    • 1046 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental Illness In Prison

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By definition, mental illness is “an affliction with a mental disease or mental condition which is manifested by a disorder or disturbance in behavior, feeling, thinking, or judgment to such an extent that the person afflicted requires care, treatment and rehabilitation” (Hall, Miraglia, Lee, 2011). This definition of mental illness provides a broad overview of what many individuals in our society are dealing with every day. Although it may be seen as a problem in mainstream society, it is often overlooked in prison. Upwards of 61 percent of prisoners who committed a violent offense suffer from mental illness (CITE).…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The amount of individual that go through the criminal justice system that have a mental illness has become a growing issue in the criminal justice system. Many individual that enter the criminal justice system are bound to end up in prison, where they have little access to mental health help. The amount of individual that enter the criminal justice system that have a serious mental illness is estimated to be 16.9 percent. These individuals are usually repeat offenders that circulate through the system because they do not receive the treatment that they need. (Almquist & Dodd, 2009).…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Christopher Kim Hamlet Insanity Synthesis Essay Hello. I am NY district attorney Christopher Kim present at the trial of Hamlet. We are here today to judge whether or not Hamlet is guilty for the cold-blooded murder of Polonius. Some say that it was an accident, while some say that it was on purpose.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays