Mencius's Argument On Human Nature Is Good

Superior Essays
According to Chinese Confucian philosopher, Mencius, human nature is good. He believed that we are all inherently good and with time, people become better. In this paper, I will elaborate on Mencius’ views on human nature and reasons why he thinks people have intrinsically good nature. Second, I will introduce Xunzi’s argument on his negative views of human nature. His beliefs are that people are morally blind and emphasizes the importance of rituals, sages, and teachers in the world. Then, I will present Mencius’ possible counterargument to Xunzi’s opposition of good human nature. Lastly, I will draw to a close on how I agree with Mencius on how human nature is inherently good and that the argument on human nature being bad is implausible …show more content…
Mencius believed that becoming a good person was a process throughout one’s life. He stated that failing to become a good person was like failing to have the right amount of limbs and like a tree, we grow and take time to become the good person we were meant to be (Binghamton University, PHIL105, 16 Jan 2018, Goodman). In Mencius’ book, he explains that humans are born with the Four Sprouts and during our journey in life of becoming a good person, our goal is for the Four Sprouts to later grow and become the Four Virtues. The Four Sprouts are having a heart of compassion, shame, modesty, and righteousness and wrongfulness and for them to transform into having benevolence, righteousness, the observance of rites, and wisdom. In support of the existence of the Four Sprouts and Four Virtues and them being a fundamental part of being human, Mencius shares a story of a child falling into a well. According to Book II Part A in Mencius, Mencius speaks of a man seeing a young child on the verge of falling down a well. Because one has the Four Sprouts, the man would obviously have some type of urge to save the child. This goes to show that humans have a natural impulse to be good. Any person that sees a child on the edge of death would have motivation to save him. This parable reveals that all people are meant to be good. The only reason people are not is because of environmental circumstances (Lau 125). In Book VI Part A, Mencius presents a circular argument that states that goodness is a result of growing in a healthy environment, and a healthy environment is one that comes from humans being good. He explains that a man is always capable of being good and the bad in him is not the his fault and because of this, all people are meant to be fundamentally

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Confucius’ mis-representation of the concept of chivalry portrays his lack of ethical understanding of the society around him. Certainly, Confucius’ and Lao Tzu’s ideologies have guided humanity’s roadmap since ancient history. Their long-lasting works have allowed people all over the world find the one truth that encompasses us all. The difference that promotes Lao Tzu’s teachings over Confucius, however, is the classification of people below or above us, the ultimate flaw in ethical…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle believed goodness is attained through a parent and a child’s friendship. A parents role in raising a child is to love, teach, and guide a child so his/her life is good, and they will learn what virtues lead to a happy life. Another example in The Inferno, Dante meets an astonishing neo-platonic philosopher, Virgil, who guides him through good and evil to understand life on his extraordinary…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Nature of Man Eric Burdon once stated “Inside each of us, there is the seed of both good and evil. It's a constant struggle as to which one will win. And one cannot exist without the other.” Burdon’s statement about human nature explains that there is a perpetual battle between good and evil within all of us and it is up to one’s self to choose what action takes over us. Many people have their own opinions of how human nature should be defined, some think we are all naturally flawed and are damned to hell and others believe we are naturally good and can be perfected.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Proper Order in Confucianism and as educated fundamentally by Mencius, the Chinese scholar, which is the applied hypothesis that trains how individuals can achieve their most astounding capability of moral and material prosperity encapsulated in Mencius' origination of human nature. The hypothesis of proper order is the essential and philosophical route to that end. Proper order has had enduring and substantial consequences for present day East Asian governmental issues and its connection between the state and society, and even on a smaller level of the individual and community. Indeed, the hypothesis of proper order begins first at the individual level and from that point twists to make a positive undulating impact all through all of society.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another example is when people drive at excessive speeds, only worried about arriving somewhere on time rather than the safety of others. Although some presume human nature to be inherently good, humans are inherently evil because they are ultimately selfish. Many argue that humans are inherently good. Altruism, or selflessness, is the core of goodness in humanity.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miss Evers Boys Sparknotes

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The great philosopher Aristotle believed that being a “good person” is about being virtuous, finding the right balance between the two extremes of character, also known as the ‘golden mean’. He believed that we could all become good by doing…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although many understand the concept of human nature loosely, as an abstract idea that may or may not define what is means to be a human being, C.S. Lewis in The Abolition of Man, treats human nature as something serious and necessary, yet at risk of being pushed to the back of everyone’s minds and ultimately forgotten. Lewis’ work, which at first seems to be a critique of modern education, reaches into the depths of the human soul and tries to make sense of it. By taking a simple flaw in one literature book, he ascertains the direction in which human nature is going, where it should go and the consequences derived from both paths––which are either the elimination of or the infiniteness of the true nature of man. In the first chapter, Lewis references an English schoolbook–The Green Book, as he calls it–written by authors he names Gaius and Titius.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle claims that humans are born amoral. Hobbes alleges that humans are born morally bad. John Locke contends that humans are born amoral. I believe all human beings are born amoral without the familiarity of good and bad deeds. However, as they mature, different cultures impart them with diverse experiences that either make them immoral or moral.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogue between Socrates and Meno revolve around a fundamental issue: whether virtue can be taught. However, Socrates indicates that it is unfeasible to answer this question without knowing what virtue really is. He is interested in knowing the intrinsic nature of a virtue and what makes all instances of virtue, virtuous. In other words, the reason why something is a virtue. Although Meno produces his first faulty definition when he says, “If you want the virtue of man, it is easy to say that a man’s virtue consists of being able to manage public affairs…, and be submissive to her husband” (71e), it still does not answer Socrates’ question.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Seungyoon, Mok (USC ID: 4269-80-1785) TA: Gladys Mac EALC 110g – East Asian Humanities 1st Paper 10.22.2014 Topic: Compare and contrast the attitudes of Mencius and Xunzi to the subject of human nature. How do these differences relate to their different interpretations of individual betterment? When we get up and read newspapers in the morning, we can contact diverse news.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “On Human Nature” Refutation David Hull’s “On Human Nature” is an article written to oppose human nature. Specifically, it challenges human evolution as the cause of universality/commonality of human traits. The case made in the article utilizes the logic behind Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection: evolutionary changes come via the generation of variation in each generation and differential survival of individuals with different combinations of these varying traits. The central thesis of “On Human Nature” is that any common set of traits that people share is due to chance as opposed to the inner workings of evolution.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One can argue that man’s human nature is both inherently good and evil, but it is through the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden that each generation born after them was no longer born without shame, which Hsun Tzu does a great job of showing how man’s nature is inherently evil. Hsun Tzu was a Chinese scholar who followed the Confucian belief who lived from 300-230 BCE. He wrote this piece of literature explaining how man is not born with an innocent or pure nature, meaning that in the eyes of God when we are born we are born sinful. If this was not the case, and Mencius was correct about humans being pure in nature then no one would have the urge to murder, steal or anything that we consider to be sinful today. However, this is not…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are humans good or bad? This is a question that many have asked throughout humanity. For thousands of years, several philosophers have debated about whether human nature is good or is human nature bad. I believe that no human is perfect and we all have our faults we all make mistakes. I don’t think that we are necessarily good or bad, I believe that we have the ability to be both good and bad.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s “Meno”, Meno prompts Socrates to answer a question concerning virtue and whether or not it can be taught. Socrates approaches this question with another question, which requires Meno to first define virtue. He explains to Meno that his approach is wrong and in order to answer a question about the nature of something, we must first understand what that something is. Socrates and Meno then engage in a dialogue in which they inquire into two questions: what virtue is and whether it can be taught. This style of philosophy is commonly known as the “Socratic Method” in which Socrates and his interlocutors participate in a form of inquiry in which Socrates asks questions to stimulate critical thinking.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each individual has a different understanding of what the word “bad” or “evil” mean. If one person believes that stealing is bad, another person might believe that stealing is a good thing if it serves the greater good, for example, Robin Hood. The words “bad” and “good” are subjective and can vary in people’s views. Yet, by looking at the world today, it is difficult to say that humans are naturally good. However, when a child is brought into this world, one tends to associate them with purity and innocence.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays