Memorial Of The Cherokee Nation Essay

Improved Essays
Memorial of the Cherokee Nation is about the plight of the Cherokee Indians in the 1830s. Beginning after the War of 1812 when the white men were moving south in to states such as Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, five civilized Indian nations occupied these states and the Cherokees in particular were located in Georgia. This land was prime for growing cotton and the white farmers wanted the Indians off of the land so they could prosper from cotton growing. There were federal treaties in place granting the Cherokee and the other Indian nations in the area the right to live on the lands they occupied. There were two cases that went before the Supreme Court, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1830) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832), where the Supreme Court upheld the rights of the Cherokees. “Chief Justice John Marshall defined Indian tribes as “dependent domestic nations” subject only to the authority of the federal government.” (Goldfield, p. 206-207). Andrew Jackson’s presidency was scarred by the plight of the Cherokees because of his disregard to the Supreme Court rulings. Jackson supported states’ rights in regards to removing the Indians. Jackson like many of his Southern supporters felt that the Indians were inferior to the white man and they could not live …show more content…
One of Jackson’s early moves in his presidency was the Indian Removal Act. Jackson’s support of state rights showed in his first message to the nation stating the Indians would be subject to the laws of the state in which they lived. By Jackson recommending voluntary removal, he was trying to appeal to the Indians to move on their own before the states took action against them. Jackson did not offer any federal protection for the Indians. He did send in the United States Army who gathered up Indians who were refusing to move

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Another one of Andrew Jackson speeches was the Speech to Congress on the Indian Removal Act on December 6, 1830. In Andrew Jackson’s speech to Congress, he wanted to have all Native American tribes move to the East of the Mississippi. He thought this was a good idea because he wanted to have land for new citizens that lived in the United States.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He gave the Indian tribes a message of peace as if he didn’t want to do anything against them, showing the peace between him and the Indian Tribes. Also in his Second Annual Message to Congress he stated "Toward the aborigines of the country no one can indulge a more friendly feeling than myself, or would go further in attempting to reclaim them from their wandering habits and make them a happy, prosperous people." By doing so, he conveyed that he had no intentions of harming the tribes and wanted to show his good intentions to them. By this time, the Indian Removal Act was slowly coming to a decision of being accepted or not, and even though he had been planning the removal, Jackson reassured the Indian tribes that it was to help rather than harm them, though in reality he was actually harming. For many years, the Indian tribes had lived on the American lands with their belief that the land didn’t belong to a single person but to everyone. The land where the tribes lived on was where…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the time, Army general Andrew Jackson was an activist of “Indian removal.” He had spent years leading vicious campaigns against the Native Americans which resulted in hundreds of thousands of acres of land being taken from…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice. A cherokee Indian from the “Memorial of the Cherokee Nation,” describes the western land as badly supplied with food and water, unfamiliar cultures, and “wish to die” on this soil (Doc. K). Jackson forced the Indians to surrender their land and failed to provide any support in terms of food and other necessities for their westward migration. Because of the Indian’s utmost disenchantment, it is possible that they took their case to the Supreme Court. However, Jackson could have ignored that decision since he already had a majority vote in Congress to be condemned and impeached. Conjointly, Native Americans were gathered into similar places in the west. A map created from various sources presents the five tribes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson believed that the Native Americans were in the way of advancement to the American society and that they simply can’t survive in white society. Certain laws and treaties were enforced but necessarily not followed. The 1802 Indian Trade and Intercourse Act had provided that no land cessions could be made except by treaty with a tribe, and that federal rather than state law would operate in Indian Territory. In 1832, after the Supreme Court ruled that states couldn’t legally extend their jurisdiction into Indian Territory, Jackson refuses to enforce the Court’s decision. He was actively working on and in favor of Indian removal. “Jackson uprooted seventy thousand Indians from their homes and drove them west of the Mississippi River. He was clearing the way for the rise of the Cotton Kingdom”(Tamaki 82). This showed how disrespected the native American’s were from the society. The native American’s had no choice to stay they would have been attacked by the American…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress in 1830 during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The Act was the first major law that Jackson enforced. It stated that the president could relocate the newly civilized Native Americans west of the Mississippi River while the Americans could have control over the land that the Native Americans had previously occupied in Georgia and Florida. Although the removal of Native Americans was supposed to be done fairly, Andrew Jackson and his government ignored the law in order to get more benefits from the situation. The five main tribes that were relocated were the Cherokee, Seminole Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes. Jackson proposed the Act because he disliked the Native Americans in the United States…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy”... (Doc 2) Jackson was open minded about the Indian tribes. This allowed him to have a future friendship, or in a sense, loyalty towards each other. This loyalty was carried on for some time and then Jackson authorized all Native Americans to be removed from the Southeast states of Georgia, Mississippi, & Alabama and moved west of the Mississippi River after gold was found on Cherokee land in Georgia. Some of the major tribes that were affected were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes. "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that...to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." (Doc 1) When Jackson said his inauguration, he says that he will, “preserve.” When he goes against the just and liberal policy with the Native Americans, he breached the affirmation of preserving the Union. Because of his Indian fighting in Florida during the 1820s, he had a deep seeded hatred toward the "savage" Native Americans; however, Jackson took two steps to help hide his hatred. Yet this hatred led to disliking the Natives and forgetting all about the just and liberal policy that he had agreed to with the Native…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson professed the Indian Removal Act would be best for the tribes to get away from the whites and it gave them their chance to escape U.S. power. In Jackson's eyes, removing the Indians will also grant them a happiness that they find on their journey. In Jackson's speech to congress he states, ¨It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions.¨ One of Jackson's other main concerns for the Indians was their deteriorating population in an area on the ring of fire of whitemen, he says ¨... progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west. The tragic incident happened during winter, about 1900 Indians were force marched across the country. A quarter of the 1900 died during the march, In the process of marching the Indians are not allowed to stop to bury the dead. The trail where the Indians marched is known as Trail of tear (Andrew). Jackson did not go along with the Supreme Court decision in the case for The Cherokees. In Jackson’s mind he probably believes that he’s above the law in a certain way. In order to achieve his goal of removing all Indians, he ignored the court’s order. Jackson let his ego take control of himself, causing this tragically movement in the U.S.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Influence

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This act also forced the removal of the Cherokee Indians from native lands to Indian territory. “It will incalculably strengthen the Southwestern frontier”(ABC-CLIO). Jackson’s goal for this act was to expand west, discover new terrain and make the country even bigger than it originally was. We wanted to move west because their land for farming and for the amount of gold they have in the south. The Indian Removal Act left a devastation for the country to take account for. On paper, The Indian Removal Act was supposed to be a peaceful process where we bring troops into the Native American tribes and tell them to leave. Some tribes left with no problem at all, but others would refuse to leave so we had no other choice in other than to remove them with using excessive force. The Indian Removal Act was a horrible thing to happen to America, but what Jackson did substantially increased our size in the country. Andrew Jackson influenced the growing and development for our own country, if it weren 't for Jackson, the Southern part of America would of never…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of his greatest accomplishments as president was when he became involved in a battle with the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson took a stand towards this monopoly and vetoed its re-charter bill, charging the bank with unfair economic privilege. Even though Jackson was popular with the common man, his presidency did have some controversies. One policy that is up for debate is how Jackson dealt with the Native Americans. In 1830, many southerners wanted Native Americans to move out of their land and in response; Jackson urged congress to pass the Indian Removal Act (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive. The south wanted land and were willing to kill the Indians to get it. Jackson believed that it was wise and humane and would save the Indians from annihilation. In the article, Feller says “the terms offered for their evacuation were reasonable and even generous” (Feller). Historian H. W. Brands wrote that given the "racist realities of the time, Jackson was almost certainly correct in contending that for the Cherokees to remain in Georgia risked their extinction” (Brands). I have to mostly disagree with what Feller has to say in his article. He talks ill of Jackson and even calls him an “Indian-hater” (Feller). On the contrary, Jackson actually did adopt a Native American boy. I also do not find what Jackson did as awful as Feller did or what most people…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans were outraged by Britain’s actions and overwhelming voted for war in the House of Representatives (Doc B) with most of the supporting voters coming from the south (Doc B). The War of 1812 truly had no outcome but it did solidify the American’s independence and starts and era of increased expansion and nationalism. In 1828, Andrew Jackson was elected as president and his main policies were anti-Indian and expansionist. To clear out more space for expansion, Jackson forced the six American Indian nations to relocate into American Indian reservations far away from the Atlantic Ocean (Doc D). The most notorious case of the Indian removal was the Trail of Tears, in which President Jackson ignored the ruling of the Supreme Court and forced the Cherokee nation to relocate. During the harsh winter, the Cherokee walked through four different states (Doc D) to reach the American Indian Reservation in Oklahoma. This event illustrates another president creating his own policy as he disregards the government’s founding laws. Even though Jackson’s decision was mostly disliked, followers supported him by stating “the Cherokees have resisted, and successfully too, every effort to meliorate [improve] their situation, or to introduce among them the most common arts of life” (Doc C). The Indians “moral and their intellectual condition have been equally stationary” and…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds. This law triggered the mass genocide of Indians in the United States. The Indian Removal Act was unjustifiable due to the natives creation of a civilized…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays