Christopher Nolan’s Memento is organized in a way that the story and character development is presented to the audience backwards and with the same amnesia as the character. We experience scenes out of order and backwards. In the film Leonard talks with the motel manager about his memory condition (Memento 8:00). However, this has happened before, we the viewers are just know seeing the exchange between the characters for the first time. This can help the audience have a connection with Leonard and his condition. It can give the viewer the same feeling of newness that Leonard has because he doesn’t remember any of the previous interactions and the viewers have not either. Each scene depicts what preceded the scene that was just shown. A good
…show more content…
As the black-and-white episodes come near to the linear end of the film. Leonard is talking to Officer Gammell(Teddy). This policeman(Teddy) seems to know about Leonard’s condition and history. Which as the audience we know is true. He steers the conversation toward Leonard locating and killing his wife’s murderer. In fact, Teddy is waiting in the motel lobby to give Leonard directions to a meeting place where his wife’s killer, a drug dealer named Jimmy Grants will be. Teddy has arranged another one of his side deals with this man we figure out. Leonard writes down a description of the officer and, for the chronologically first time in the film, leaves his room. While meeting in the lobby we see for the first time in the film world that these men met. One interestingly little part of this scene here is when Leonard calls Teddy Officer Gammell in front of the hotel manager who doesn’t seem to notice. Teddy’s look at the manger meaning they may have met before (Memento 1:35). The two men walk outside, and now Leonard takes a picture of Gammell and Gammell tells Leonard that he should call him …show more content…
In the last shot of the film, he screeches to a halt in front of a tattoo parlor. The camera lingers on the tattoo parlor’s sign. “Now, where was I?” he says. The film screeches to a halt too, at least in the normal way of beginning, middle, and end. But, of course, now we also turn back toward the film’s opening sequence. What of this final version of the original question: So where are you? When the question was first asked, we recall, Leonard was just waking up, alone with no knowledge of immediate time or place. He was, in a sense, marooned in a kind of pure present. He had no sense of his existence in terms of an ongoing story-time. Our sense of ourselves depends on our not-necessarily-conscious awareness of being embedded in storytime in such a way that the present moment satisfies all the parts of story. “Now” is the middle between what has come before and what has yet to come; it is the end of what has come before; and it is the beginning of what is yet to come. If we are somehow removed from story-time, we lose all these interconnected orientations and are effectively removed from the human world. But when Leonard asks “Now, where was I?” he has, at least in a sense, re-inserted himself into story-time. He speaks in first person, no longer removed from himself into “you,” and he uses the narrative past tense to situate himself in relation to the present instant. The instant after Leonard asks this last
As the black-and-white episodes come near to the linear end of the film. Leonard is talking to Officer Gammell(Teddy). This policeman(Teddy) seems to know about Leonard’s condition and history. Which as the audience we know is true. He steers the conversation toward Leonard locating and killing his wife’s murderer. In fact, Teddy is waiting in the motel lobby to give Leonard directions to a meeting place where his wife’s killer, a drug dealer named Jimmy Grants will be. Teddy has arranged another one of his side deals with this man we figure out. Leonard writes down a description of the officer and, for the chronologically first time in the film, leaves his room. While meeting in the lobby we see for the first time in the film world that these men met. One interestingly little part of this scene here is when Leonard calls Teddy Officer Gammell in front of the hotel manager who doesn’t seem to notice. Teddy’s look at the manger meaning they may have met before (Memento 1:35). The two men walk outside, and now Leonard takes a picture of Gammell and Gammell tells Leonard that he should call him …show more content…
In the last shot of the film, he screeches to a halt in front of a tattoo parlor. The camera lingers on the tattoo parlor’s sign. “Now, where was I?” he says. The film screeches to a halt too, at least in the normal way of beginning, middle, and end. But, of course, now we also turn back toward the film’s opening sequence. What of this final version of the original question: So where are you? When the question was first asked, we recall, Leonard was just waking up, alone with no knowledge of immediate time or place. He was, in a sense, marooned in a kind of pure present. He had no sense of his existence in terms of an ongoing story-time. Our sense of ourselves depends on our not-necessarily-conscious awareness of being embedded in storytime in such a way that the present moment satisfies all the parts of story. “Now” is the middle between what has come before and what has yet to come; it is the end of what has come before; and it is the beginning of what is yet to come. If we are somehow removed from story-time, we lose all these interconnected orientations and are effectively removed from the human world. But when Leonard asks “Now, where was I?” he has, at least in a sense, re-inserted himself into story-time. He speaks in first person, no longer removed from himself into “you,” and he uses the narrative past tense to situate himself in relation to the present instant. The instant after Leonard asks this last