For prologue of the Melancholia and the original soundtrack, which is the Prelude to “Tristan und Isolde”, may be considered as they are fitting since the main focus of the first part of the movie, Justine, is suffering from depression and thinking that only way out of the evilness of the world is for it to end as we can see from how much relieved she is after she learned that Melancholia is going to hit the world. And in a relatable way (I mean it is not my opinion, but I can understand how one can think like that), “death, surcease of being, the sleep that knows no waking” is the only way to escape the painful love and life. However, the repetition of a very little fragment of such beauty is just seem meaningless. …show more content…
The music and the scene is not just fits in the means of rhythm but also in meaning. The lyrics of “Lascia ch'io pianga” is about desire to get freedom and to end suffering, which fits Justine’s case. Similarly, when the Prelude to “Tristan und Isolde” is used in the prologue of Antichrist, they fit in the same both ways. As I said before, in my opinion the piece is not about death, it is about the events that are about to happen, thus, it accompanies nicely to Antichrist. Together with this compatibility, the slowly moving scene and the tempo of the piece is creates a harmonic …show more content…
I think it must be disappointing for a director to look like as if all of his movies are in the same way and some parts are interchangeable. As a one that is usually pro of change and development I no longer find him so much worth to follow. Before I took this class I thought they were hard to watch but good and affecting movies. Now I don’t know what did I get from watching them or if they were worth to watch those movies. I know it is not my place to say that but it is my current opinion, Lars von Trier’s style is feeling like the amateur writers, who think that if they write nonsense people would think that the meaning is so deep, and it is good