Mehta is the only person who has connection with both the groups such as the Bonazzi and Indo group. Mehta being the CEO of Bonazzi is appointed for a purpose. He should understand the Indo group and share his views to the Bonazzi Goup and vice-versa. He can think from both their views and make the best decisions. HE should create, communicate and execute a clear vision, strategies and goals so that the future of the Joint Venture is bright. He also should make sure that the Indo and Bonazzi group is ready for a change. But due to communication problems, Mehta has not been able to put out his best work. Therefore, he needs to follow the below mentioned recommendations:
Translation: As the Bonazzi group is based …show more content…
The Indo Group follows a more traditional culture and the Bonazzi Group follows a more western culture. This can lead to a huge culture clash between both the groups. But the only hope that this wouldn’t happen is Mehta. Mehta is an Indian who is appointed as the CEO of the Italian group. He can dilute the culture difference by explaining where the other group is coming from. He can understand both the group’s wavelength and make decisions. All he has to make sure is that, there is no communication gap and show some appreciation to both the groups so that they stay …show more content…
If there is any difference in opinion, he should have made sure, to explain what they are thinking and the reason behind that thought. All thoughts needs some reasoning, and if these reasons were valid enough to both the groups, then the meetings would have be much more peaceful. And even if these a situation where none of them can decide what decision should be made, then the CEO, ie, Mehta should step in and act professional and make a decision and this decision should be appreciated by both the