Medical Malpractice

Improved Essays
Medical malpractice lawsuits are increasingly becoming a common feature in the medical field in recent times. This to majority of physicians is a nightmare because most of them, or any other medical practitioners, do not anticipate a situation in their medical career where they will be sued by the same patients they swear to assist in their admission to the medical fraternity.

However, despite this increased awareness of medical negligence by medical practitioners on the part of the public, there is strong evidence to suggest that most of the patients still remain uninformed on the finer details of malpractice lawsuits. It is therefore important that patients and the public in general be sensitized on a number of issues concerning medical
…show more content…
Normally, these high costs might be in form of retainers for medical expert that will be needed to prove the case, financial expert witnesses who will be needed to quantify the financial implications that might emanate from the medical malpractice, among other expensive requirements by the plaintiff.

Fourth, malpractice suits normally move at a slow pace in the justice system due to the complexity of majority of them, which also ought to be considered. The justice system is littered with people who file a lawsuit simply because their medical billing was wrong or something equally non-relevant, which is clearly not a case of malpractice.

Lastly, not all cases of malpractice end up with a remedy in favor of the patient, there must be an injury on the part of the plaintiff for the medical malpractice to be legally established. For a case that has documented merits, most cases are settled out of court so that the doctor or hospital can avoid the publicity that would inevitably be associated with a successful malpractice lawsuit, but most patients do not have the necessary level of documentation, or are unable to recreate it after the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the hospital argued that Dr. Graybeal wasn’t their employee. And they weren’t in control of what done by Dr.Graybeal. To be an employee or servant of the hospital, the hospital must be in charge of the work their employee has done. Therefore, the doctor’s negligent wasn’t their responsibility. Whereas, plaintiff argued, when they were in the ER room, and the attending physician took care of them, no matter who was in charge of the authorities, the hospital should be liable since it was underdetermined and mistreated by one of its…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When people undergo medical procedures, they put their lives in someone else’s hands. Though everyone deserves the highest standard of care, medical negligence is a very real problem around the country. If you sustained new or worse injuries because of a healthcare professional’s negligence, Cronin Fried Sekiya Kekina & Fairbanks in Honolulu, HI, will help. At Cronin Fried Sekiya Kekina & Fairbanks, they help clients pursue justice from doctors and hospitals for gross negligence and misconduct.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orr V. Bell Case Summary

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exceptional care and professional responsibility is a standard form of practice the general public rely upon for their health care needs. But, what happens when codes of conduct, rules and codes of ethics are violated and physicians fail to provide adequate care and diagnostics? When circumstance like this arise, who becomes responsible for the negligence on behalf of the patient? In the case of Orr vs. Bell, due to the negligence on behalf of Dr. Bell, the patient Orr went misdiagnosed and eventually became paralyzed. The review of this case will document and prove due to Dr. Bell’s failure to follow nationally recognized Radiologic ethics and rules Dr. Bell failed to determine Orr’s medical issue and therefore was responsible for the outcome…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Robert Williamson uses these studies to argue to the court that admitting my client’s past medical bills is giving the Defendant a pass on pain and suffering simply because the Plaintiff was treated by a doctor or hospital whose charges are less than those in other locales within the state or country. Our National Listserv Moderator and KBC Faculty member, Len Gabbay, agrees with Robert. Len encourages us to argue to the court that our client’s medical bills are not probative of any issue in the case since the cost of medical treatment is not an issue in the case. Len Gabbay warns that if the Defense subpoenas the bills, then we should file a motion to Quash the subpoena. According to Len, we must force the defense to articulate why the medicals…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence or Malpractice? The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. I have spent the last ten years as a paralegal and dealing with all kinds of cases. During those ten years, we represented plaintiffs and defendants.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over $200 billion dollars a year is wasted. I feel like doctors over test their patients to protect themselves from a lawsuit. People today are very quick to sue if a doctor opts not…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes malpractice lawsuits are well warranted, however, sometimes they do not have legal merit. The conclusion of the article best summarizes the author’s advice to physicians faced with frivolous malpractice lawsuits when he states, “Doctors should hold the legal profession accountable when attorneys overstep. Give them a taste of their own medicine, and ask for damages. The number of frivolous cases has declined significantly since various tort reform measures have been enacted. If physicians are lucky, outrageous cases will be dismissed before too much expense is incurred.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There may be further time limits to learn about, and new obligations can be forced by the law in the upcoming time. As a consequence, because of such time limits on when a claimant may bring a court proceeding, it is of great importance to speak to a health care misconduct attorney whenever possible later than your injury takes place. Compensation…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Crocker V. Roethling

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In a medical negligence cases, the plaintiff needs to prove that “the care of the health care provider was not in accord with the standards of practice amongst members of the same health care profession with related training and experience in similar communities at the time of the purported act giving rise to the cause of action. One of the vital elements of a claim in medical negligence is that the defendant did breach the applicable standards of medical care owed to the plaintiff. The Plaintiffs must establish the appropriate standard of care through expert testimony as seen in the case of Crocker v. Roethling, 363 N.C. 140…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will discuss liability and negligence in the healthcare field as well as negligence issue in the healthcare field. Liability is defined as a potential for a lawsuit (Dunn 114). Liability can be found just about anywhere and is a concerning area in today’s age. Healthcare workers are very familiar to this word and been familiarized throughout their careers with this word. I can’t be a scary thing to think about in this field the potential to be sued from an employee level all the way to a corporate level.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Malpractice Theory

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For example, in Wright's study, they found that for every 100 patients, there is one patient that files a claim when they suffer from medical malpractice (Wright, 2011). A similar study conducted by The California Medical Association found even better results as one in every 125 patients suffer from medical malpractice (Wright, 2011). This is impressive as the law profession receives upwards to six claims of negligence per a 100 clients (Kritzer & Vidmar, 2015). The problem here and why these researches are relevant to this study's research question is that despite the low number of medical malpractice claims, there is actually a large amount of medical malpractice that exists; a notion supported by 30 years’ worth of empirical research (Kritzer & Vidmar, 2015). A potential cause for these low claims is that it is hard to establish medical negligence as the claimant would need to prove before the judges, causation beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard of proof in law (Hartwell, 2005).…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort claim cost so much money to the healthcare organizations. Healthcare organizations like hospitals are making less profit because of the money they have to spend to pay for those claims. In addition, they have to provide malpractice insurance to their physicians. Moreover, tort claim would harm a healthcare organization reputation. Consequently, claims will decrease the demand for medical care causing patients to go to a different hospital or practice to seek for better…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the unfortunate case of Canterbury versus Spence, had the patient believed he was properly informed about the procedure, there likely would not have been a suit. Not only do patients suffer when they are ill informed of the procedure they will undergo, but doctors face many consequences when the information provided is lacking or misunderstood. Doctors are constantly made to fear that the patient will seek legal retribution when outcomes are unexpected; the threat of a malpractice or negligence suit is constantly looming about. “Failure by a doctor to properly provide the…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays