During the years of the 1880s to the 1930s, which encompasses the Industrial Period, the two nations of Japan and India were beginning to industrialize their way of life, as other nations had in the past. More specifically Japan and India were industrializing the mechanization of their large cotton industries. Japan and India can be viewed as comparable in their mechanization process, both increasing the amount of technology utilized in factories in the production of cotton. Throughout this process of industrializing their cotton industries, both countries differed in the people and genders that constituted the work forces of these new factories. As well as, and the conditions of factories in the respective nations. Moreover, the pair of countries
…show more content…
According to Document Seven, it is noticed that a larger percent of women worked in the cotton factories in Japan. In Japan there was about an 80% constant percent of women working in cotton textile factories. However in India, as time proceeded, from the year 1909 to 1934, the amount of women working in the factories dropped from about 22% to 18%(Doc. 7). However it should also be mentioned that the source of document seven is "The Industrialization and The Status of Women in Japan." Despite the fact that the source was released in 1973, well after the industrial period in Japan, the numbers could be skewed. They could possibly be skewed in order to depict that women had a large role in society. This is a dissertation coming from female organization, and may want to uphold that women were in the work place and had social status during the Industrial era. Additionally, the numbers could also be falsified in the percentage points between Japan and India, in regards to the amount of women working in the factory. This is not surprising because this organization may want to uphold and highlight how industrialized Japan was compared to other nations. As well as, how they could be a worldwide imperial power. Moreover, Document Three attests to …show more content…
Verification of this is evident as many people in India were opposed to how industrialization took away, jobs in the hand cotton industry and the market for handicraft cotton goods. They were also dissatisfied with how this destroyed small local economies (Doc.6). With the introduction of new factories, hand weavers became unemployed or could not maintain their business and were thus recruited to work in factories (Doc.6). Furthermore, many people of India saw the need to repair and reestablish the native economy of India incorporating local hand woven goods local cotton manufacturers, supported with local investors or bankers (Doc.6). Radhakamal Mukerje is an Indian economist, who is the source of a document found in the book, “The Foundation of Indian Economics.” This book could be seen as directed toward the British government, to explain the hardships the Indian people have endured. Radhakamal Mukerje’s profession concerns the economy therefore; his livelihood depends on how the Indian economy performs. Thus, he wants serious altercations to occur, vindicating why his writings were so punitive when recounting the effect local Indian economy. Additionally, this common idea is also shown in Document Nine, as it reiterates the
According to Document Seven, it is noticed that a larger percent of women worked in the cotton factories in Japan. In Japan there was about an 80% constant percent of women working in cotton textile factories. However in India, as time proceeded, from the year 1909 to 1934, the amount of women working in the factories dropped from about 22% to 18%(Doc. 7). However it should also be mentioned that the source of document seven is "The Industrialization and The Status of Women in Japan." Despite the fact that the source was released in 1973, well after the industrial period in Japan, the numbers could be skewed. They could possibly be skewed in order to depict that women had a large role in society. This is a dissertation coming from female organization, and may want to uphold that women were in the work place and had social status during the Industrial era. Additionally, the numbers could also be falsified in the percentage points between Japan and India, in regards to the amount of women working in the factory. This is not surprising because this organization may want to uphold and highlight how industrialized Japan was compared to other nations. As well as, how they could be a worldwide imperial power. Moreover, Document Three attests to …show more content…
Verification of this is evident as many people in India were opposed to how industrialization took away, jobs in the hand cotton industry and the market for handicraft cotton goods. They were also dissatisfied with how this destroyed small local economies (Doc.6). With the introduction of new factories, hand weavers became unemployed or could not maintain their business and were thus recruited to work in factories (Doc.6). Furthermore, many people of India saw the need to repair and reestablish the native economy of India incorporating local hand woven goods local cotton manufacturers, supported with local investors or bankers (Doc.6). Radhakamal Mukerje is an Indian economist, who is the source of a document found in the book, “The Foundation of Indian Economics.” This book could be seen as directed toward the British government, to explain the hardships the Indian people have endured. Radhakamal Mukerje’s profession concerns the economy therefore; his livelihood depends on how the Indian economy performs. Thus, he wants serious altercations to occur, vindicating why his writings were so punitive when recounting the effect local Indian economy. Additionally, this common idea is also shown in Document Nine, as it reiterates the