Meat Consumption: The Ethical Issue Of Eating Meat

Improved Essays
The issue of meat consumption and on whether to allow the practice or discontinue it has been a controversial topic. Non-meat eaters argue it is unethical because it is abusive to animals, in the sense that animals are not given the opportunity to roam free and experience its surroundings. On the other hand, meat consumers argue that eating meat is ethical as long as meat eaters are conscious of how their meat is collected and the treatment of livestock is The consumption of meat is an act that an individual decides whether to partake in or not. Therefore, the option of eating meat should not be completely taken away, but should be limited. Eating meat ties in with vegetarian and vegan diets, in the sense that both have to follow guidelines to create an ethical approach to eating any grown foods. The consumption of food is ethical when both meat eaters and non-meat eaters understand the organisms they affect with their food choices. Finally, an understanding of where and how food is grown can create awareness and gratitude, which can cause the U.S population to reflect on its own excessive amount of meat consumption compared to other countries. In sum, the option of eating meat shouldn’t be completely …show more content…
Just like any other produce, meat has protocols on how to harvest it in a humane way. Meaning, meat distributors have to kill their livestock in the least painful method possible and provide the livestock with a decent life before its demise. Meat consumers’ and non-meat eaters’ roles are to be aware of the food choices they make that affect organisms and be grateful for the meal they have been granted from a life form’s sacrifice. Lastly, meat eating habits should be limited to stable conditions in order to be ethical. In other words, the U.S’ excessive meat consumption is not ethical and should decrease to meet up with other nation’s standards to become reasonable with both non-meat eaters’ and meat eaters’

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Humans are unaware of the suffering of the animals we consume meat from. For example, majority of the chickens in factory farms have their beaks cut by clipping or burning them off. The factory farms perform this to chickens to avoid chickens pecking each other to death. When we purchase factory farmed pork, beef, or chicken, we are contributing to a factory farming system that harms pigs, cows, or chickens for our gustatory pleasure which is also…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wellesley argues that there is a rapid increase in the levels of meat consumption in the United States of America and across European countries. The level of meat consumption has reached the unsustainable level for both the human health and the planet.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument “Against Meat” Jonathan Foer gives his personal opinion on the problems with factory farms and shares why he thinks we do not need to eat meat to satisfy ourselves. Foer’s main point of this article is the struggle he faced with the contradictory nature of our values. He also believes that factory farms cause a significant amount of problems such as global warming, deforestation, and pollution. Factory Farms produce more than 99 percent of the animals eaten in the United States and throughout the years have accumulated a bad reputation on the treatment of their animals. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N stated animal agriculture is the number one cause of global warming.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The agricultural/food industry has been in many argument about how animals and crops are being raised and killed to feed the american people. Michael Pollan uses his selection “An Animal’s Place” to defend his right to eat as he pleases. While, Blake Hurst uses his article “The Omnivore’s Delusion” to shield post-modern farming techniques from a mass of uneducated critics. Now, read as these two duke it out against their opponents to see if they can live as they want. Michael Pollan, a writer/activist, fights for his right to animals as he sees fit.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no doubt that food is the paramount needs for human beings because food provides nutrients for human and without food human can’t survived in the world. In general, there are many different ways to get nutrients such as fruit, vegetable and animals meat but as we live in a developed science and technology society all you need is money, you can buy any food you want even though delivery food to you houses. As the matter of facts, food industries are mass produce food with chemicals that can make the food stay for a period of time and the price attracted for people to buy more and it turns out that meat is more cheaper than vegetables. However, in the essay of “ Against Meat” written by Jonathan Safran Foer, he described his experience of became a vegetarianism and the influence that he…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyone has to eat in order to survive. But where and what are most Americans eating now? In “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer and “What You Eat Is Your Business” by Radley Balko, the authors try to answer these simple questions. Gone are the days of sitting down with the whole family to a large table laden with food. In today’s world most people are choosing convenience and time saving ways of getting food to the traditional family sit down meal.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I have always believed in animal rights and still do, although now I see that advocating for animal welfare would be much more beneficial. Hurst article made me see the reality of farming and how mankind could not survive without it. Coupled with Pollan’s belief that animals should die with the respect they deserve, I have come to see that animals deserve to be treated with respect and to die the same and only then can one eat them knowing it is morally right. In conclusion, Pollan believes that there are ways one can limit the meat they eat to nonindustrial animals to coincide with their morals, while Hurst believes today’s society should learn more about farming before coming to harsh conclusion about…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Changing human diet can be a controversial topic and to change this omnivore’s mind one needs to present facts as cold as a fresh cut of meat. Marjorie Lee Garretson’s “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is an essay that tries to persuade the reader to a vegan lifestyle under the guise of vegetarianism using few cited sources and trying to make the reader feel bad about the way they currently eat. “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is a college level essay written by Marjorie Lee Garretson about the potential positives to vegetarian lifestyle. The essay first focuses on the health benefits of switching to vegetarianism which is done in three sentences claiming decreased cancer rates and longer life expectancy without any…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eating animals has been a regular meal for humans for many centuries, but it has also been opposed by veganists for many years. Although consuming animals has been opposed by vegan aficionados, it has also been a source of controversy because of how factory farming produces the meat we eat in our daily meals. In the book “Eating Animals” we get the sense that the author will be arguing and encouraging veganism, but instead he argues about how the meat we consume is produced. The author Jonathan Safran Foer’s main claim in the book is about boycotting animal factory farming and encouraging traditional husbandry because factory farm animals are stuffed with antibiotics, mutilated, tightly confined, and deprived of stimulation. While traditional…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America has made a lot of changes in the past on becoming more inventive, resourceful, and as well as industrialized. Due to the variations in how our food industries operate, small family-owned farms have rapidly vanished leaving us with large, industrialized productions that mass produce for the benefit of the Large Corporations. Americans expect to be able to have large quantities of food available for purchase at anytime and at a low price. Unfortunately in order to get that food to us at low prices, we have to sacrifice aspects of animal rights, human rights, the environment, and health.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, the widespread belief that farming conditions should change or that humans should avoid meat would negatively impact the economy. In the article, “Is there a moral case for meat?”, Nathanael Johnson splits his essay into two parts. In the first part of the article, Johnson tries to find a logical counter…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Vegetarians protest and fight the meat industry,” in most cases this is not true; however, it is commonly assumed. Many vegetarians are people who are trying to live a healthier lifestyle or people who just disagree with how meat is commonly processed. Although intentions are good skeptics and veggie lovers alike have their concerns with this dietary practice. The most notable concern is that of potential health risks . The benefits and risks of this way of life has raised many eyebrows over the years.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays