Meat Consumption: The Ethical Issue Of Eating Meat

Improved Essays
The issue of meat consumption and on whether to allow the practice or discontinue it has been a controversial topic. Non-meat eaters argue it is unethical because it is abusive to animals, in the sense that animals are not given the opportunity to roam free and experience its surroundings. On the other hand, meat consumers argue that eating meat is ethical as long as meat eaters are conscious of how their meat is collected and the treatment of livestock is The consumption of meat is an act that an individual decides whether to partake in or not. Therefore, the option of eating meat should not be completely taken away, but should be limited. Eating meat ties in with vegetarian and vegan diets, in the sense that both have to follow guidelines to create an ethical approach to eating any grown foods. The consumption of food is ethical when both meat eaters and non-meat eaters understand the organisms they affect with their food choices. Finally, an understanding of where and how food is grown can create awareness and gratitude, which can cause the U.S population to reflect on its own excessive amount of meat consumption compared to other countries. In sum, the option of eating meat shouldn’t be completely …show more content…
Just like any other produce, meat has protocols on how to harvest it in a humane way. Meaning, meat distributors have to kill their livestock in the least painful method possible and provide the livestock with a decent life before its demise. Meat consumers’ and non-meat eaters’ roles are to be aware of the food choices they make that affect organisms and be grateful for the meal they have been granted from a life form’s sacrifice. Lastly, meat eating habits should be limited to stable conditions in order to be ethical. In other words, the U.S’ excessive meat consumption is not ethical and should decrease to meet up with other nation’s standards to become reasonable with both non-meat eaters’ and meat eaters’

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ethically is eating meat bad? My answer would be “NO!” But the only problem would be the ways animals are treated and processed for food. Though methods have been created to reduce the suffering of animals I 'm sure the restrictions are very loose and not exactly enforced. Our focus should be to ensure better living conditions for animals and humane treatment. The method used for organic meat should be our priority.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Veganism Vs Vegetarianism

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They’re food of course! Vegetarianism and veganism are wrong because meat is necessary for a human’s diet, it is costly and unethical to distribute vegetarian meals, and animals are on the earth for the benefit of humans and it is more than okay to eat them. Although vegetarian diets seem to be an enlightened idea to help the planet and ease suffering worldwide, this just isn’t true. The side effects of this decision outway and counteract the very issues that they try to solve as well as cause a multitude of other problems. A well known medical journal, WebMD, proves that purely vegetarian diets are harmful to all human bodies.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If you respect life, then animals are no different. You should be able to let all animals that are born to have the opportunity to live a normal and happy life and not be born for slaughter. Raising animals for slaughter is cruel because we shorten their life and force them to live in horrible conditions. Humans also get affected by this in a negative way. If you agree that animals should not be raised for slaughter, then you should not support it by purchasing meat products.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are two important questions philosophers debate on. This essay will focus on why raising and killing animals for food is morally wrong. Firstly the fact that killing and rearing animals for human consumption means that their rights are violated. As animals raised for food is being used by others rather than being respected for itself. It is being treated as a means to human ends and not as an end to itself.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this Kim is able to create logical support for his argument in layers. The health risk breakdown how an all vegetarian diet may be hazardous to one 's health and is supported by "usually eat some animal foods"(Kim) showing that it some form of animal produce is need to support a healthy diet. By identifying the reasoning behind why the switch to a vegetarian diet is successful Kim is able to show how Organizations uses strict vegetarian diets to save animals despite the health effects this change can have. By using the last section trusting your body, Kim supports the idea of making a personal decision biased off of research but offers suggestions. This supports his main argument by logically saying that research and our personal health should impact the dietary decisions we…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    PHIL 4300: Philosophy of Food Dr. Kaplan November 15, 2015 Zack Viator To Eat Meat, or Not to Eat Meat.. LOL In this paper, I will demonstrate the best arguments (in my opinion) both for and against the consumption of meat. I will conclude with my thoughts on meat consumption and why I think the best stance is a middle ground between eating meat how society currently does and not eating meat such as a vegetarian does. Arguments AGAINST eating meat: a. Cruelty- The ethical argument against eating animals is obvious. How can we cause harm to another sentient being? Livestock is raised with the intention of killing for food, at least eventually.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They can't feel the trouble that they are intended to be eaten. (Rolston, 1988). On the off chance that either a typical human grown up or a dog has to die, it is ethically best that the catastrophe jumps out on the side of the dog because less intrinsic quality of life would be lost. (Li, 2002). Therefore, killing animals in a humane way for consuming them is justified.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What this perspective means is that it is showing both sides of the people who eat meat and people who don’t. There are many pros and cons for the person eating the animal. Many people out there don’t like the idea of killing an animal to later then be eaten. Animals should be consumed as food for humans. Humans are omnivores and not vegetarians.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As an alternative, there are people who eat both meat and vegetables. However, people who eat mostly vegetables and fruits are known as vegetarians. On the other hand, others prefer to eat meat and are considered as meat eaters. Some vegetarians won’t eat meat because they blame humans for killing animals in slaughter houses and extinguish them. On the other hand, meat eaters are against eating vegetables because they would not consider themselves as "rabbits".…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays